Bamboo vs CircleCI vs Jenkins comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Atlassian Logo
3,403 views|3,414 comparisons
75% willing to recommend
CircleCI Logo
1,824 views|1,672 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Jenkins Logo
6,756 views|5,825 comparisons
88% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bamboo, CircleCI, and Jenkins based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The most valuable features are compiling and deployment.""Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and release process.""In Bamboo, build and deployment have been segregated. The build plan and deployment plan are different. When comparing Bamboo to other solutions, the native feature you will not find in another tool, such as Jenkins. They have segregated the build and deployment plan. This means, building the application and deploying it are two separate parts in Bamboo, they have segregated it apart from the UI. This makes the tool a bit better compared to other tools.""The most valuable features of Bamboo are its performance and UI. Additionally, there are a lot of useful plugins, integration with other solutions, such as Bitbucket and Jira, and a helpful online community.""In my experience Bamboo is scalable.""One of the big things that made us choose Bamboo, is it seamlessly integrates its APIs into NetSuite, which is our main ELP system.""The most useful feature of Bamboo is its integration with other solutions such as Jira and BitBucket, also offered by Atlassian. It is easier to use tools all provided by one vendor.""It can do the CI pipeline well."

More Bamboo Pros →

"It's a stable product.""The ability to automate the build process in a seamless way and run workflows effortlessly. It supports parallel builds so it can scale well. Also, it covers the basics of any build and integration tool, including email notifications (especially when tests are fixed), project insights, etc.""Enables us to detect exactly which build failed and why, and to push multiple builds to our production environment at a very fast rate.""Some of the most valuable features include container-based builds, integration with Bit Bucket and being able to store artifacts.""The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery.""The automation workflow in CircleCI related to third-party applications is very good and allows standardization of applications."

More CircleCI Pros →

"We use Jenkins to automatically build Python binaries into several OS's i.e. OS X, Ubuntu, Windows 32-bit and Windows 64-bit.""The auto-schedule feature is valuable. Another valuable feature is that Jenkins does not trigger a build when there is no change in any of the systems. Jenkins also supports most of the open-source plug-ins.""Different types of jobs, such as Pipeline, Build, Freestyle, Maven, etc.""Jenkins has built good plugins and has a good security platform.""Continuous Integration. Jenkins can integrate with almost any systems used for application development and testing, with its plugins.""Jenkins integrates with multiple tools like Bitbucket and makes life easier. We don't have to write a lot of code since a lot of libraries are available.""It has a lot of community posts and support.""The most valuable features of Jenkins are its ease of use and good plugins available. You are able to connect to a lot of solutions."

More Jenkins Pros →

Cons
"Bamboo is a bit complicated to use compared to other solutions, such as GitLab. You have to integrate different actions that are difficult that could be made easier.""Bamboo’s technical support services, in terms of speed of response, need improvement.""The performance around the deployment feature could be improved.""It can be challenging for someone new to the system or ecosystem to grasp, making it difficult to train new people and help them understand.""Scalability depends on the use case. If it is really a big customer with a lot of tests, it might not be a scalable option for them.""The marketing strategy of Bamboo is an area of concern where improvements are needed.""It's a little outdated. It's three years old.""Bamboo could improve by having compatibility with GitLab. It would be better to have this platform for deploying code and storing container registries. Bamboo does not have a container registry. Additionally, there could be more features added."

More Bamboo Cons →

"Integration with Microsoft Azure is one area for improvement. Azure is growing in its user base, and supports various cloud infrastructure components such as Service Fabric, App Service, etc. Some of Azure’s deployment models (like Kudu) require a steep learning curve, but if CircleCI would come up with such features (deployment to App Service) out of the box, it would be amazing.""The solution’s pricing could be better.""Billing is a mess.""There needs to be some improvement in the user interface of CircleCI."

More CircleCI Cons →

"It could be cheaper.""The UI of Jenkins could improve.""We need more licensed product integrations.""I would like them to provide space for people to have a central node that stores all the logs of workspace information in a distributed fashion to facilitate backup and restoration. Currently, everything is stored on one node, so you need to set up distributed storage or an endpoint that you can use for backing up your information.""The scriptwriting process could be improved in this solution in the future.""Jenkins can be improved, but it's difficult for me to explain. The initial setup could be more straightforward. If you connect Jenkins with bookings and lockouts, it can be challenging.""The upgrades need improvement.""Jenkins is not an easy solution to use and the configuration is not simple. They can improve the solution by adding a graphical interface that is more user-friendly."

More Jenkins Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "There is a subscription required to use Bamboo."
  • "If Bamboo could provide more flexibility on pricing, that would help. On the agent side, if you want to increase the number of agents it should be less expensive. If they can provide some better pricing model, it will help, whether we are going to use it or are already using it."
  • "The server products for small teams used to offer excellent pricing. However, Atlassian has since changed the offering and the pricing is more expensive. I do still think the solution offers good value for money."
  • "The price of Bamboo is reasonable."
  • "I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten."
  • More Bamboo Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of CircleCI could be less expensive."
  • More CircleCI Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It is a free product."
  • "Jenkins is open source."
  • "​It is free.​"
  • "Some of the add-ons are too expensive."
  • "It's free software with a big community behind it, which is very good."
  • "I used the free OSS version all the time. It was enough for all my needs."
  • "Jenkins is open source and free."
  • "There is no cost. It is open source."
  • More Jenkins Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    A biased and subjective comparison of Bamboo and Jenkins as CI servers for mobile development, based on practical experience with both. Continuous Integration and Continuous Deployment (Delivery, Distribution) has been around for quite a while. But surprisingly enough on a global scale it pretty much just got into its teen years in regards to mobile development. Well, subjectively, of course. You can see all levels of mobile CI these days. Some would still install builds from Xcode, others would have a quickly patched up build server under their desk. Xcode Bots meet the needs of yet another group of people. Travis CI is good and for open source projects it’s probably the best option. And guess what, I know few successful iOS development companies that develop apps for enterprise clients, and have no CI at all. The advanced level of CI would include distributed build systems with multiple build nodes, support for automated unit and UI tests, running tests on simulator and physical devices, automatic deployment to TestFlight, Hockey App, Over the Air, and much more. It becomes not just mobile development, but spans into areas like DevOps and others. Etsy’s blog post is somewhat outdated but still a very good example of where this path can take you. If you decide to take mobile CI under your total control, you have to pick a build server to start with. I personally have worked with Bamboo for 1.5 years and I’m dealing with Jenkins right now, so I have few insights… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Bamboo's integration with the rest of Atlassian's tech tools, like Jira, helps manage the end-to-end development and… more »
    Top Answer:I rate the product’s pricing a five out of ten.
    Top Answer:The tools and capabilities of the system are extensive. It can be challenging for someone new to the system or ecosystem… more »
    Top Answer:The solution offers continuous integration and continuous delivery.
    Top Answer:Beware of skyrocketing bills as CircleCI does not provide transparency into how they charge refills. Their monthly… more »
    Top Answer:We've had occasional connectivity issues with cloud resources and build failure due to its own internal system setup and… more »
    Top Answer:When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your… more »
    Top Answer:Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    3,403
    Comparisons
    3,414
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    554
    Rating
    7.7
    11th
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    1,824
    Comparisons
    1,672
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    342
    Rating
    4.0
    2nd
    out of 41 in Build Automation
    Views
    6,756
    Comparisons
    5,825
    Reviews
    37
    Average Words per Review
    382
    Rating
    7.9
    Comparisons
    GitLab logo
    Compared 43% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 8% of the time.
    Harness logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Digital.ai Release  logo
    Compared 1% of the time.
    TeamCity logo
    Compared 31% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 22% of the time.
    GitHub Actions logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    AWS CodeBuild logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    GitLab logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    AWS CodePipeline logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    IBM Rational Build Forge logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Tekton logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    GNU Make logo
    Compared 2% of the time.
    Learn More
    Overview
    Bamboo is a continuous integration and delivery tool that ties automated builds, tests and releases together in a single workflow. It works great alongside JIRA and Stash providing a fully traceable deployment pipeline.
    CircleCI's continuous integration and delivery platform helps software teams rapidly release code with confidence by automating the build, test, and deploy process. CircleCI offers a modern software development platform that lets teams ramp quickly, scale easily, and build confidently every day.

    Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

    Sample Customers
    Neocleus, MuleSoft, Interspire
    Shopify, Zenefits, Concur Technologies, CyberAgent
    Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company40%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Marketing Services Firm10%
    Non Tech Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Government8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company23%
    Media Company9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company17%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business27%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise58%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    Build Automation
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    769,479 professionals have used our research since 2012.