Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM Cloud Private vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud comparison

IBM Cloud Private and Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. IBM Cloud Private is ranked #20 with an average rating of 6.3, while Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.3. IBM Cloud Private holds a 0.8% mindshare in PSP, compared to Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 60% of IBM Cloud Private users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud users who would recommend it.
IBM Cloud Private
Read 5 IBM Cloud Private reviews
  • 500 Views
  • 94 Comparison Views
60% willing to recommend
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Read 8 Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud reviews
  • 461 Views
  • 29 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

IBM Cloud Private and Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud are competing in the enterprise cloud space, with a focus on scalability and flexibility. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is often seen as having the upper hand due to its robust features and integration capabilities.

Features: IBM Cloud Private offers integrated management tools, strong security protocols, and local deployment options ideal for sensitive environments. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud provides seamless integration capabilities, a comprehensive development environment, and broader ecosystem support, allowing it to stand out.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Cloud Private supports straightforward on-premise deployments with reliable support resources. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud enables cloud-native deployment models that facilitate quicker integrations, complemented by comprehensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Cloud Private has a competitive initial setup cost with potential robust ROI for localized environments. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud may have a higher initial cost but offers superior ROI due to its extensive features and functionality, making it an attractive investment for comprehensive cloud solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 860,168 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Private
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
20th
Average Rating
6.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Ranking in PaaS Clouds
16th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Private is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is 0.4%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
PaaS Clouds
 

Featured Reviews

CristianIriazabal - PeerSpot reviewer
A solution that ranks in the top five and integrates well with API Connect
One issue with the solution is latency because there is lag time when we connect from Argentina to IBM's data centers in Washington and Dallas. It would be a benefit to have a data center in Latin America. The solution does not offer many routes over the cloud that are available with other solutions such as AWS which is a leader in the industry.
Read full review
Adrian Bilauca - PeerSpot reviewer
Handles security setups independently for a more secure environment
OpenShift does have more secure features. Azure also has equivalent services. For my client, it was good enough to switch to Azure. For development, there wasn't any significant change in effort, however, for the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services. We used elasticity and scalability all over.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable attribute is the platform's ability to consistently deliver high reliability."
"We have control of the ESXi."
"Our core banking process was monolithic. To address this, we transitioned to a microservices-based architecture. Leveraging Microsoft technologies, including Terminals version 23, we’ve revamped our banking operations. Not all services are microservices; some remain monolithic for simplicity. Containerization is pivotal, with OpenShift (based on Kubernetes and Docker) managing our microservices."
"Excellent technical support."
"The product's framework is good, it integrates well with API Connect, and the private cloud allows for use in any location."
"For the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services."
"In general, customers appreciate its ability to run different workloads, manage applications through CI/CD pipelines like Jenkins, and leverage tools like Helm charts and Kako."
"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."
"Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensure application setup and recovery by utilizing two separate clusters on OpenShift."
"The initial setup is easy."
"The most valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is the UI console. We are able to receive the resources from the console directly."
"I've used the elasticity and scalability all over."
"The deployment mechanism has become more dynamic with the use of the product."
More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud pros
 

Cons

"Auto-scaling and managing pod scaling in the microservices architecture, a core feature of IBM Cloud Private, can pose challenges, especially when dealing with larger volumes of traffic."
"One issue with the solution is latency because there is lag time when we connect."
"I've noticed that the satellite services layer requires some improvement compared to platforms like Azure or Microsoft. While it's in development, I believe the satellite layer has room for enhancement. Additionally, the DevOps layer could benefit from closer integrations, especially for using external applications like Jenkins."
"lacking in multi-cloud management."
"The support and pricing need to improve."
"There is room for improvement in cluster-based queue monitoring and autoscaling."
"Many of the managed services are not accessible."
"The service mesh integrations could improve the solution."
"The installation and configuration procedure should be simplified."
"There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed firewall."
"The effectiveness is satisfactory, and there haven't been any additional fees due to meeting demands. However, there's room for improvement in pricing, performance, and stability. Regarding the UI, it could be more user-friendly and integrated with various platforms. Currently, the UI lacks user-friendliness, especially for developers unfamiliar with container technology. Expecting them to create YAML files for security purposes is unrealistic without proper guidance or experience. This aspect needs improvement."
"The general purpose solution tries to cater to too many customers so it is heavy."
"Technical support could be a bit better."
More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay annual licensing fees."
"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The solution is expensive."
"In general, the cost is on the higher side."
"This product is not costly when compared to other vendors."
"The pricing is a little high in China."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Recruiting/Hr Firm
17%
Real Estate/Law Firm
11%
Computer Software Company
11%
University
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Private?
Our core banking process was monolithic. To address this, we transitioned to a microservices-based architecture. Leveraging Microsoft technologies, including Terminals version 23, we’ve revamped ou...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Cloud Private?
I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten.
See all answers
What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Private?
I've noticed that the satellite services layer requires some improvement compared to platforms like Azure or Microsoft. While it's in development, I believe the satellite layer has room for enhance...
See all answers
What do you like most about Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?
Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensu...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?
From a cost perspective, some cost-effective situations were more difficult to achieve in Azure than in OpenShift. Comparing them can be difficult since the financial services cloud had stripped ma...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?
There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift vs IBM Cloud Private Logo
Red Hat OpenShift vs IBM Cloud Private
Compared 82% of the time
Microsoft Azure vs IBM Cloud Private Logo
Microsoft Azure vs IBM Cloud Private
Compared 18% of the time
More IBM Cloud Private Competitors
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Logo
Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Compared 56% of the time
Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Logo
Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Compared 44% of the time
More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
PaaS Clouds
June 2025
IBM Cloud Private reportDownload IBM Cloud Private product report
Buyer's Guide
PaaS Clouds
June 2025
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud reportDownload Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

ICP
No data available
 

Overview

IBM Cloud Private is a private cloud platform for developing and running workloads locally. It is an integrated environment that enables you to design, develop, deploy and manage on-premises, containerized cloud applications behind your firewall. It includes the container orchestrator Kubernetes, a private image repository, a management console and monitoring frameworks.

IBM

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud™ is a fully managed OpenShift service that leverages the enterprise scale and security of IBM Cloud, so you can focus on developing and managing your applications.

Deploy highly available, OpenShift clusters as-a-service with the click of a button on IBM Cloud. Move and build OpenShift-based workloads on a managed public cloud service to gain increased responsiveness, scalability, and reliability.

IBM
 

Sample Customers

Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company
edenor, Ford
Buyer's Guide
IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
June 2025
Free Report: IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
860,168 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud report.
See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.