IBM Cloud Private vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud comparison

IBM Cloud Private and Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. IBM Cloud Private is ranked #20 with an average rating of 6.3, while Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.3. IBM Cloud Private holds a 0.8% mindshare in PSP, compared to Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 60% of IBM Cloud Private users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud users who would recommend it.

IBM Cloud Private

Read 5 IBM Cloud Private reviews

547 Views
415 Comparison Views

60% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Read 8 Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud reviews

436 Views
267 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

IBM Cloud Private

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

IBM Cloud Private and Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud are competing in the enterprise cloud space, with a focus on scalability and flexibility. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is often seen as having the upper hand due to its robust features and integration capabilities.

Features: IBM Cloud Private offers integrated management tools, strong security protocols, and local deployment options ideal for sensitive environments. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud provides seamless integration capabilities, a comprehensive development environment, and broader ecosystem support, allowing it to stand out.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Cloud Private supports straightforward on-premise deployments with reliable support resources. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud enables cloud-native deployment models that facilitate quicker integrations, complemented by comprehensive customer service.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Cloud Private has a competitive initial setup cost with potential robust ROI for localized environments. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud may have a higher initial cost but offers superior ROI due to its extensive features and functionality, making it an attractive investment for comprehensive cloud solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 851,451 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Cloud Private

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

20th

Average Rating

6.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of IBM Cloud Private is 0.8%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

CristianIriazabal

Architect of solutions at Gire S.A.

A solution that ranks in the top five and integrates well with API Connect

One issue with the solution is latency because there is lag time when we connect from Argentina to IBM's data centers in Washington and Dallas. It would be a benefit to have a data center in Latin America. The solution does not offer many routes over the cloud that are available with other solutions such as AWS which is a leader in the industry.

Read full review

Adrian Bilauca

Chief Software Engineer at Totalsoft

Handles security setups independently for a more secure environment

OpenShift does have more secure features. Azure also has equivalent services. For my client, it was good enough to switch to Azure. For development, there wasn't any significant change in effort, however, for the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services. We used elasticity and scalability all over.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Excellent technical support."

"The product's framework is good, it integrates well with API Connect, and the private cloud allows for use in any location."

"The most valuable attribute is the platform's ability to consistently deliver high reliability."

"We have control of the ESXi."

"Our core banking process was monolithic. To address this, we transitioned to a microservices-based architecture. Leveraging Microsoft technologies, including Terminals version 23, we’ve revamped our banking operations. Not all services are microservices; some remain monolithic for simplicity. Containerization is pivotal, with OpenShift (based on Kubernetes and Docker) managing our microservices."

"I've used the elasticity and scalability all over."

"The most valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is the UI console. We are able to receive the resources from the console directly."

"The portability, moving from one platform to another, is easy."

"In general, customers appreciate its ability to run different workloads, manage applications through CI/CD pipelines like Jenkins, and leverage tools like Helm charts and Kako."

"The initial setup is easy."

"For the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services."

"The deployment mechanism has become more dynamic with the use of the product."

"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud pros

Cons

"The support and pricing need to improve."

"Auto-scaling and managing pod scaling in the microservices architecture, a core feature of IBM Cloud Private, can pose challenges, especially when dealing with larger volumes of traffic."

"lacking in multi-cloud management."

"I've noticed that the satellite services layer requires some improvement compared to platforms like Azure or Microsoft. While it's in development, I believe the satellite layer has room for enhancement. Additionally, the DevOps layer could benefit from closer integrations, especially for using external applications like Jenkins."

"One issue with the solution is latency because there is lag time when we connect."

"The effectiveness is satisfactory, and there haven't been any additional fees due to meeting demands. However, there's room for improvement in pricing, performance, and stability. Regarding the UI, it could be more user-friendly and integrated with various platforms. Currently, the UI lacks user-friendliness, especially for developers unfamiliar with container technology. Expecting them to create YAML files for security purposes is unrealistic without proper guidance or experience. This aspect needs improvement."

"The general purpose solution tries to cater to too many customers so it is heavy."

"The installation and configuration procedure should be simplified."

"There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed firewall."

"The service mesh integrations could improve the solution."

"Technical support could be a bit better."

"Making it even more cost-effective could be explored."

"Many of the managed services are not accessible."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay annual licensing fees."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."

"The solution is expensive."

"In general, the cost is on the higher side."

"The pricing is a little high in China."

"This product is not costly when compared to other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

851,451 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Recruiting/Hr Firm

18%

Real Estate/Law Firm

11%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about IBM Cloud Private?

Our core banking process was monolithic. To address this, we transitioned to a microservices-based architecture. Leveraging Microsoft technologies, including Terminals version 23, we’ve revamped ou...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Cloud Private?

I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Cloud Private?

I've noticed that the satellite services layer requires some improvement compared to platforms like Azure or Microsoft. While it's in development, I believe the satellite layer has room for enhance...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

From a cost perspective, some cost-effective situations were more difficult to achieve in Azure than in OpenShift. Comparing them can be difficult since the financial services cloud had stripped ma...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed...

See all answers

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift vs IBM Cloud Private

Compared 83% of the time

Microsoft Azure vs IBM Cloud Private

Compared 17% of the time

More IBM Cloud Private Competitors

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 100% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

May 2025

Download IBM Cloud Private product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

May 2025

Download Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud product report

Also Known As

ICP

No data available

Overview

IBM Cloud Private is a private cloud platform for developing and running workloads locally. It is an integrated environment that enables you to design, develop, deploy and manage on-premises, containerized cloud applications behind your firewall. It includes the container orchestrator Kubernetes, a private image repository, a management console and monitoring frameworks.

IBM

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud™ is a fully managed OpenShift service that leverages the enterprise scale and security of IBM Cloud, so you can focus on developing and managing your applications.

Deploy highly available, OpenShift clusters as-a-service with the click of a button on IBM Cloud. Move and build OpenShift-based workloads on a managed public cloud service to gain increased responsiveness, scalability, and reliability.

IBM

Sample Customers

Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company

edenor, Ford

Buyer's Guide

IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

April 2025

Free Report: IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

851,451 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM Cloud Private vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.