Azure NetApp Files vs Nutanix Move comparison

NetApp and Nutanix are both solutions in the Cloud Migration category. NetApp is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while Nutanix is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.0. NetApp holds a 4.2% mindshare in CM, compared to Nutanix’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 89% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

Azure NetApp Files

Read 18 Azure NetApp Files reviews

4,300 Views
1,505 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Nutanix Move

Read 8 Nutanix Move reviews

1,336 Views
1,309 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure NetApp Files

Nutanix Move

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Azure NetApp Files and Nutanix Move compete in the realm of data storage and migration. Azure NetApp Files has an advantage due to its high-speed provisioning and excellent integration within the Azure ecosystem, while Nutanix Move stands out for its simplicity in managing VMware migrations.

Features: Azure NetApp Files provides remarkable flexibility, high responsiveness, and robust data protection through SnapMirror and SnapLock, fully integrated with Azure services. Nutanix Move offers seamless automation, live migration with no downtime, and easy integration with both VMware and Hyper-V, making it ideal for straightforward migration processes.

Room for Improvement: Azure NetApp Files could enhance its offering by improving versioning, expanding replication capabilities across more regions, and optimizing costs. Users have highlighted challenges related to high pricing and limited integration options. Nutanix Move can improve by offering migration back to Hyper-V, expanding scalability, and handling a larger number of VMs simultaneously.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure NetApp Files, tailored for the public cloud, offers integration with Azure services but faces deployment complexity concerns. Microsoft customer service is generally favorable, though users sometimes need intermediaries for effective resolution. Nutanix Move excels in on-premises and hybrid environments, noted for its ease of use and responsive support. However, more direct migration options would enhance user experience.

Pricing and ROI: Azure NetApp Files is positioned as a premium product with nuanced usage-based pricing; it can be costly initially but offers significant cost savings when optimized. Nutanix Move, typically part of the Nutanix product bundle, is often available at no additional cost within existing licenses, providing a cost-effective solution for VMware migrations while being rich in features without added licensing fees.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure NetApp Files vs. Nutanix Move Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Nutanix Move

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure NetApp Files

Ranking in Cloud Migration

9th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (12th), Public Cloud Storage Services (14th)

Nutanix Move

Ranking in Cloud Migration

10th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of Azure NetApp Files is 4.2%, down from 14.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Move is 2.7%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure NetApp Files	4.2%
Nutanix Move	2.7%
Other	93.1%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

Rajat Wadhwa

Cloud Architect at IBM

Cross-region replication has delivered seamless disaster recovery for enterprise storage needs

In terms of improvement, I would say cost reservation; the cost is a bit high. If we compare Azure Files and Azure NetApp Files, I know that customers are using less of Azure NetApp due to the cost. If they bring the cost a little bit closer to what Azure Files offers, it can be a great product in the market and bring a lot of business to NetApp. Backup is quite critical. As of now, Azure NetApp Files requires you to use Azure NetApp Backup solution, which is in public preview at the moment. I would definitely expect NetApp to come up with that solution so that customers can start using it because they do not have confidence in backup as it is still in preview. They are still doing some testing and research on that product, which is not officially released for use by multiple customers.

Read full review

Joel Amate

Project Engineer at CTC

Can migrate workloads in just a click

The automated migration feature is the most effective. It automates the whole process, like installation from VMware to Nutanix AHV cluster. It retains the IP and MAC addresses of VMs and cleans up migrated VMs by removing VMware tools from the source. The automated migration is seamless - when we do the cutover, Nutanix Move powers off the source VM and automatically powers on the virtual machine on the Nutanix cluster. There's also a manual method for workloads that can't be migrated automatically, like Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008, which might not have the required PowerShell version. In these cases, we can still migrate using data migration only, but the engineer has to do more work, like reassigning IP and MAC addresses.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution is replication to another region and the performance. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. The initial setup is straightforward."

"It has saved a lot of time. Because in the older, conventional hardware system, they need to raise a ticket to go to storage engineering, then storage engineering would increased the size. Now, it's dynamic. You don't have to do anything. This improved the time by more than 50 percent."

"The critical features of this solution are SnapMirror for replication, data protection, and SnapLock."

"We recommend this solution to our customers because of its ease of use, availability, and security, but they don't usually go for it because of its price."

"It is faster. It is quicker. It is reliable."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its flexibility."

"This solution definitely makes us more efficient in being able to provide storage quickly to our customers in the Azure Cloud."

"This solution is intuitive, easy to learn, and easy to use."

More Azure NetApp Files pros

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Move is how simple it is and the benefit of what it does."

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Move is its simplicity."

"The solution is stable."

"The automated migration feature is the most effective. It automates the whole process, like installation from VMware to Nutanix AHV cluster. It retains the IP and MAC addresses of VMs and cleans up migrated VMs by removing VMware tools from the source. The automated migration is seamless - when we do the cutover, Nutanix Move powers off the source VM and automatically powers on the virtual machine on the Nutanix cluster."

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"It is easy to set up the solution."

"We can change the hypervisor without any downtime."

"Nutanix Move has changed helped in making the painful process of migrating from one hypervisor to another better."

More Nutanix Move pros

Cons

"In terms of improvement, I would say cost reservation; the cost is a bit high. If we compare Azure Files and Azure NetApp Files, I know that customers are using less of Azure NetApp due to the cost."

"Reserved Instances for Azure NetApp Files would improve more use cases, making them more valuable in Azure as the cost would be reduced."

"We would like to see more paired regions for the replication."

"I would like to see multi-zone redundancy so that I don't have to worry about it. I just back up my data to that one SMB share and I know that it's replicated to a different region."

"The solution needs to improve it's ABS environment."

"I don’t like the solution’s configuration and support."

"Azure NetApp Files is expensive."

"The pricing definitely needs to be improved."

More Azure NetApp Files cons

"We'd like Nutanix to be more flexible in the future."

"We can migrate from Hyper-V to Acropolis, but we can't move from Acropolis back to Hyper-V. However, we do not have customers who want to, but if we could reassure them that it was possible it would be better. Having our Hyper-V customers have a two-way option that may help. A customer would like to hear that if they do switch they can switch back. I know it's a limitation on Hyper-V but not a limitation on VMware."

"We cannot use the solution to move a machine from Nutanix to other hypervisors."

"They should have some tools to migrate the workload from another Nutanix platform."

"I think Nutanix Move could be improved by adding a way to retry failed migrations. Sometimes when seeding fails, there's no way to redo it without recreating the whole migration plan. I'd like a button to restart the process without creating a migration plan."

"We can migrate from Hyper-V to Acropolis, but we can't move from Acropolis back to Hyper-V."

"When you have regular questions, like how do I do something in the tool or when you want to know when can I do anything in the product, the solution's support team can take around three to four days to give you an answer, or they may even sometimes take more time."

"Nutanix Move could be made more scalable, so you could do more instead of taking five or ten VMs at a time."

More Nutanix Move cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s combination of the ease of use, simplicity, and reduction in IT management versus the cost has helped a lot. It is very fast to deploy. It's very easy to maintain. You don't have to do a lot in the cloud to maintain this thing, so it gives good performance. It's fast to deploy, easy to maintain, and it gives a better performance. These are the most basic three criteria for any application. This saves cost because the manpower you need to deploy is going down. You're getting better performance and not buying new resources. You have resources available in the cloud. It's just a couple of clicks, then you're good to go."

"In the cloud, pricing depends on how you manage it. It's not necessarily cheap, but it's all about optimizing charges and showing the cost back. So, it's more about managing the expenses rather than being inherently expensive or cheap."

"It is expensive in small environments, which could be better. The reason is the four terabyte minimum. A one terabyte minimum would be better."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a seven out of ten."

"NetApp is a premium offering, so it's not a cheap product, but it is well-priced. It combines a couple of properties which customers like us are willing to pay. Could it be cheaper? Yes, but if you combine fully supported, fully managed, easily provisioned, scalable, and quick all in one product, it's a good selling point. You can ask a lot of money for all these. If you have a use case like we do, it's a perfect match. It's like the Porsche of storage solutions in the cloud. It is totally worth the cost."

"This solution is very expensive compared to the alternatives."

"We are currently on a pay-as-you-go model with the storage that we use."

"The pricing depends on your scaling and consumption."

More Azure NetApp Files pricing and cost advice

"The solution is open-source."

"The tool is bundled as part of the Nutanix license."

"It is a free tool."

"The product is available for free."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

15%

Healthcare Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?

Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the file capabilities of Azure and NetApp to move critical file-based applications to ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure NetApp Files?

On pricing, I would rate it around eight. It's highly priced, and there's no cost reservation option available compared to Azure Files. If NetApp could bring that kind of model for customers to sav...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure NetApp Files?

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Move?

I think Nutanix Move could be improved by adding a way to retry failed migrations. Sometimes when seeding fails, there's no way to redo it without recreating the whole migration plan. I'd like a bu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Nutanix Move?

I use the solution to migrate workloads between different places like Nutanix, Azure, and AWS.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Nutanix Move?

I rate the overall solution a nine out of ten. My advice to others looking into using Nutanix Move: With VMware's acquisition by Broadcom, many enterprise companies are looking for alternative HCI ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon S3 vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 11% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

Nasuni vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 5% of the time

More Azure NetApp Files Competitors

OpenText Migrate vs Nutanix Move

Compared 27% of the time

Avepoint Migration Platform vs Nutanix Move

Compared 23% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Nutanix Move

Compared 19% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Nutanix Move

Compared 9% of the time

Densify vs Nutanix Move

Compared 4% of the time

More Nutanix Move Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files

August 2026

Download Azure NetApp Files product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Move

August 2026

Download Nutanix Move product report

Also Known As

NetApp ANF, ANF

No data available

Overview

Azure NetApp Files offers flexibility, speed, and tight Active Directory integration, making it versatile. Its scalability, rapid response time, and replication capabilities like SnapMirror enhance its value, along with SEC compliance through SnapLock and efficient database management.

Azure NetApp Files is a robust service for unstructured data storage within Microsoft Azure and on-premises environments. It supports NFS and CIFS protocol testing, SQL backups, SAP virtualization, Azure Virtual Desktop, and event collection. This service facilitates seamless provisioning, non-disruptive resizing, and fast snapshots for disaster recovery. Known for high availability and cost-effective throughput, its ease of use and security make it preferred by users. Issues with high pricing and support highlight areas for enhancement, alongside desires for expanded regional availability, better security, and integration with diverse solutions.

What are the key features of Azure NetApp Files?

Flexibility: Supports diverse applications with robust Active Directory integration.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to increased performance demands.
Fast Snapshotting: Enhances disaster recovery capabilities.
SnapMirror: Provides effective replication features.
SnapLock: Ensures SEC compliance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

High Availability: Delivers reliable performance.
Cost-effective Throughput: Balances performance with expenditure.
Ease of Use: Simplifies data management tasks.
Non-disruptive Resizing: Facilitates seamless storage adjustments.
Enhanced Security: Protects sensitive data effectively.

In educational contexts, Azure NetApp Files shines by offering seamless data handling and high IOPS performance, supporting high-demand environments like research facilities. For enterprises, it aids legacy system migrations and optimizes virtual environments while enhancing data protection and file share performance.

NetApp

Nutanix Move simplifies automated and seamless migrations without downtime, integrating smoothly with VMware and Microsoft Hyper-V. It automates essential tasks, retaining network configurations, and offers flexibility for manual interventions, ensuring minimal business disruption during migration.

Nutanix Move is a key tool for organizations migrating virtual machines to Acropolis Hypervisor from VMware or Hyper-V. Users benefit from its ability to transfer between hypervisors and its support for physical to virtual conversions. The migration process is fully automated, efficient, and maintains IP and MAC addresses while allowing manual adjustments. Though user-friendly and cost-effective, some enhancements, such as reverse migration support from Acropolis to Hyper-V and improved scalability for multiple simultaneous VM migrations, are needed. Users also express a need for migration tools for other Nutanix platforms and an option for direct migration from vSphere without vCenter dependency. Despite these areas for improvement, Nutanix Move efficiently supports significant data migrations and adapts to different infrastructures across availability zones.

What are Nutanix Move's key features?

Automated Migration: Streamlines migration with no downtime, retaining IP and MAC addresses.
Seamless Integration: Works well with VMware and Hyper-V for smooth transitions.
Flexible Setup: User-friendly setup process, supporting large data migrations.

What benefits should users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Favorable pricing for extensive migration needs.
Minimal Disruption: Ensures business continuity with live migration capabilities.
Enhanced Flexibility: Supports a wide range of infrastructure transitions and availability zones.

Organizations in diverse industries use Nutanix Move to transfer virtual machines across different platforms like VMware, Hyper-V, and Acropolis Hypervisor. It supports varied setups including Nutanix, Azure, and AWS, meeting the needs for flexibility and efficient data handling in complex infrastructures.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

SAP, Restaurant Magic

1-800-FLOWERS.COM, The Home Depot, JetBlue, Cape Coral, City of Westfield, Cloud Comrade

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Nutanix Move

August 2026

Free Report: Azure NetApp Files vs. Nutanix Move

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure NetApp Files vs. Nutanix Move and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure NetApp Files vs. Nutanix Move report.

See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.