Azure NetApp Files vs Nutanix Move comparison

NetApp and Nutanix are both solutions in the Cloud Migration category. NetApp is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.3, while Nutanix is ranked #6 with an average rating of 9.6. NetApp holds a 11.7% mindshare in CM, compared to Nutanix’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of NetApp users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Nutanix users who would recommend it.

Azure NetApp Files

Read 17 Azure NetApp Files reviews

2,365 Views
828 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Nutanix Move

Read 8 Nutanix Move reviews

541 Views
530 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Azure NetApp Files

Nutanix Move

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 1, 2025

Azure NetApp Files and Nutanix Move compete in the realm of data storage and migration. Azure NetApp Files has an advantage due to its high-speed provisioning and excellent integration within the Azure ecosystem, while Nutanix Move stands out for its simplicity in managing VMware migrations.

Features: Azure NetApp Files provides remarkable flexibility, high responsiveness, and robust data protection through SnapMirror and SnapLock, fully integrated with Azure services. Nutanix Move offers seamless automation, live migration with no downtime, and easy integration with both VMware and Hyper-V, making it ideal for straightforward migration processes.

Room for Improvement: Azure NetApp Files could enhance its offering by improving versioning, expanding replication capabilities across more regions, and optimizing costs. Users have highlighted challenges related to high pricing and limited integration options. Nutanix Move can improve by offering migration back to Hyper-V, expanding scalability, and handling a larger number of VMs simultaneously.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure NetApp Files, tailored for the public cloud, offers integration with Azure services but faces deployment complexity concerns. Microsoft customer service is generally favorable, though users sometimes need intermediaries for effective resolution. Nutanix Move excels in on-premises and hybrid environments, noted for its ease of use and responsive support. However, more direct migration options would enhance user experience.

Pricing and ROI: Azure NetApp Files is positioned as a premium product with nuanced usage-based pricing; it can be costly initially but offers significant cost savings when optimized. Nutanix Move, typically part of the Nutanix product bundle, is often available at no additional cost within existing licenses, providing a cost-effective solution for VMware migrations while being rich in features without added licensing fees.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure NetApp Files vs. Nutanix Move Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Nutanix Move

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,566 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure NetApp Files

Ranking in Cloud Migration

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Storage (9th), Public Cloud Storage Services (11th)

Nutanix Move

Ranking in Cloud Migration

6th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of Azure NetApp Files is 11.7%, down from 15.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nutanix Move is 4.1%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Nutanix Move	4.1%
Azure NetApp Files	11.7%
Other	84.2%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

AjayKumar13

Cloud/Data/Database Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Fast, reliable, and helps meet our SLAs

The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes. It is faster. It is quicker. It is reliable. You don't need to take the snapshot. Snapshots are compressed. It doesn't take storage from the back end. It takes three minutes to do sixty terabytes of the database. You don't have to go to the tape and store it outside, which takes hours and hours. It also uses a lot less of the storage. It's very easy to restore or copy the snapshots to other locations for disaster recovery. There are a lot of benefits. In terms of the snapshot's rapid restore capability, we were testing the load of performance testing, and we needed to rebuild the DR site. If I need to rebuild the DR for a standby database, it takes sixty terabytes to copy onto the another site, which will take at least a day. Now, the snapshot is easy. We just copy the snapshots, and then we do the cross-region application. The snapshots came along with that, and that's where we were able to build the DR site within a few hours rather than days. All together, instead of a four-day process, instead of a day.

Read full review

Celso Toledo

Senior Infrastructure Manager, Information Technology at Pediatrix

A highly stable and simple solution used to effectively migrate VMs

The most valuable feature of Nutanix Move is its simplicity. Nutanix Move is a seamless product. You point the solution to your VM. It runs the scripts on the VMs and runs a bunch of scripts on it. Once done on the VMware side, it powers the VM down, disconnects the mix so you don't have any conflicts on your network, and brings up the converted VM on Nutanix, and you're back to work. Depending on the size of the VM and how much data you're seeding, it might be an hour, a day, or two. After the converting piece or a minute's cutover, the solution runs the final scripts, syncs up the last data, and you're back up and running. Nutanix Move is very seamless and does not impact the business.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use Azure NetApp Files mainly for backup."

"One aspect of Azure NetApp Files that I truly appreciate is its remarkable performance capabilities."

"The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes."

"The most valuable features of the solution is replication to another region and the performance. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. The initial setup is straightforward."

"I think the easiest part is, when you do a comparison, it is the throughput versus the cost. And it's much easier to set up."

"It has saved a lot of time. Because in the older, conventional hardware system, they need to raise a ticket to go to storage engineering, then storage engineering would increased the size. Now, it's dynamic. You don't have to do anything. This improved the time by more than 50 percent."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its flexibility."

"Using NetApp Files got us out of a really difficult situation quickly, effectively, and at a reasonable cost."

More Azure NetApp Files pros

"The product's initial setup phase is straightforward."

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Move is its simplicity."

"The easy migration is the most valuable feature."

"It is easy to set up the solution."

"We can change the hypervisor without any downtime."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Move is how simple it is and the benefit of what it does."

"The automated migration feature is the most effective. It automates the whole process, like installation from VMware to Nutanix AHV cluster. It retains the IP and MAC addresses of VMs and cleans up migrated VMs by removing VMware tools from the source. The automated migration is seamless - when we do the cutover, Nutanix Move powers off the source VM and automatically powers on the virtual machine on the Nutanix cluster."

Cons

"We would like to see more paired regions for the replication."

"Azure NetApp Files could improve by being more diverse to integrate better with other solutions, such as Splunk and the on-premise version. There are some use cases that are not covered natively by Azure. It is not the best solution because it is not external from the cloud which for me is the best type of solution."

"Reserved Instances for Azure NetApp Files would improve more use cases, making them more valuable in Azure as the cost would be reduced."

"The pricing definitely needs to be improved."

"The main area for improvement is in the support ticket system. Since it's a SaaS platform, support tickets are managed by Microsoft or NetApp backend. This can sometimes lead to cross-functional challenges for organizations."

"We would like for the files which are coming in that we can version them. So, if a file is accidentally deleted, there should have a recycle bin option where we can go back, and at least once, clean it up."

"We would like to have backup functionality built-in so that we don't run into the issue where the replication process makes a copy of the corrupted data."

"The main hurdle in promoting this solution is the price. Its price definitely requires an improvement. It is more expensive than other options, so customers go for a cheaper option."

More Azure NetApp Files cons

"The most valuable feature is the automation. The solution will clone the data that you want to migrate, shut down the virtual machine, disconnect it from the network and start the clone virtual machine inside the solution's platform."

"They should have some tools to migrate the workload from another Nutanix platform."

"I think Nutanix Move could be improved by adding a way to retry failed migrations. Sometimes when seeding fails, there's no way to redo it without recreating the whole migration plan. I'd like a button to restart the process without creating a migration plan."

"When you have regular questions, like how do I do something in the tool or when you want to know when can I do anything in the product, the solution's support team can take around three to four days to give you an answer, or they may even sometimes take more time."

"We'd like Nutanix to be more flexible in the future."

"Nutanix Move could be made more scalable, so you could do more instead of taking five or ten VMs at a time."

"We cannot use the solution to move a machine from Nutanix to other hypervisors."

"We can migrate from Hyper-V to Acropolis, but we can't move from Acropolis back to Hyper-V. However, we do not have customers who want to, but if we could reassure them that it was possible it would be better. Having our Hyper-V customers have a two-way option that may help. A customer would like to hear that if they do switch they can switch back. I know it's a limitation on Hyper-V but not a limitation on VMware."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution’s combination of the ease of use, simplicity, and reduction in IT management versus the cost has helped a lot. It is very fast to deploy. It's very easy to maintain. You don't have to do a lot in the cloud to maintain this thing, so it gives good performance. It's fast to deploy, easy to maintain, and it gives a better performance. These are the most basic three criteria for any application. This saves cost because the manpower you need to deploy is going down. You're getting better performance and not buying new resources. You have resources available in the cloud. It's just a couple of clicks, then you're good to go."

"The price of Azure NetApp Files could be better."

"The performance has improved by about 30 percent."

"The licensing fees for this solution vary, ranging from a single shelf to a full suite."

"Our pricing has not been determined because we are still waiting on additional features."

"The pricing depends on your scaling and consumption."

"In the cloud, pricing depends on how you manage it. It's not necessarily cheap, but it's all about optimizing charges and showing the cost back. So, it's more about managing the expenses rather than being inherently expensive or cheap."

"It is expensive, especially with NetApp Ultra Storage."

More Azure NetApp Files pricing and cost advice

"The tool is bundled as part of the Nutanix license."

"The product is available for free."

"It is a free tool."

"The solution is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

22%

Healthcare Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?

Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the file capabilities of Azure and NetApp to move critical file-based applications to ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure NetApp Files?

The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure NetApp Files?

It is expensive, especially with NetApp Ultra Storage.

See all answers

What do you like most about Nutanix Move?

The easy migration is the most valuable feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Move?

The tool is bundled as part of the Nutanix license.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Nutanix Move?

I think Nutanix Move could be improved by adding a way to retry failed migrations. Sometimes when seeding fails, there's no way to redo it without recreating the whole migration plan. I'd like a bu...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 27% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 24% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

Nasuni vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon FSx vs Azure NetApp Files

Compared 7% of the time

More Azure NetApp Files Competitors

OpenText Migrate vs Nutanix Move

Compared 54% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs Nutanix Move

Compared 46% of the time

More Nutanix Move Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files

October 2025

Download Azure NetApp Files product report

Buyer's Guide

Nutanix Move

September 2025

Download Nutanix Move product report

Also Known As

NetApp ANF, ANF

No data available

Overview

Azure NetApp Files offers flexibility, speed, and tight Active Directory integration, making it versatile. Its scalability, rapid response time, and replication capabilities like SnapMirror enhance its value, along with SEC compliance through SnapLock and efficient database management.

Azure NetApp Files is a robust service for unstructured data storage within Microsoft Azure and on-premises environments. It supports NFS and CIFS protocol testing, SQL backups, SAP virtualization, Azure Virtual Desktop, and event collection. This service facilitates seamless provisioning, non-disruptive resizing, and fast snapshots for disaster recovery. Known for high availability and cost-effective throughput, its ease of use and security make it preferred by users. Issues with high pricing and support highlight areas for enhancement, alongside desires for expanded regional availability, better security, and integration with diverse solutions.

What are the key features of Azure NetApp Files?

Flexibility: Supports diverse applications with robust Active Directory integration.
Scalability: Easily adjusts to increased performance demands.
Fast Snapshotting: Enhances disaster recovery capabilities.
SnapMirror: Provides effective replication features.
SnapLock: Ensures SEC compliance.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

High Availability: Delivers reliable performance.
Cost-effective Throughput: Balances performance with expenditure.
Ease of Use: Simplifies data management tasks.
Non-disruptive Resizing: Facilitates seamless storage adjustments.
Enhanced Security: Protects sensitive data effectively.

In educational contexts, Azure NetApp Files shines by offering seamless data handling and high IOPS performance, supporting high-demand environments like research facilities. For enterprises, it aids legacy system migrations and optimizes virtual environments while enhancing data protection and file share performance.

NetApp

Nutanix Move simplifies this process with infrastructure-level bulk VM migrations, removing the friction associated with onboarding new infrastructure, and enabling businesses to quickly leverage the full potential of Nutanix Enterprise Cloud, with near-zero VM or application service outage during migrations.

Nutanix

Sample Customers

SAP, Restaurant Magic

1-800-FLOWERS.COM, The Home Depot, JetBlue, Cape Coral, City of Westfield, Cloud Comrade

Buyer's Guide

Azure NetApp Files vs. Nutanix Move

September 2025

Free Report: Azure NetApp Files vs. Nutanix Move

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure NetApp Files vs. Nutanix Move and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure NetApp Files vs. Nutanix Move report.

See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.