Azure Monitor vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management comparison

Microsoft and BMC are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8, while BMC is ranked #44. Microsoft holds a 6.2% mindshare in CMS, compared to BMC’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of BMC users who would recommend it.

Azure Monitor

Read 55 Azure Monitor reviews

5,343 Views
2,687 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Read 5 BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management reviews

171 Views
44 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Azure Monitor

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and Azure Monitor compete in cloud management and monitoring. Azure Monitor has an advantage due to its advanced analytics and integration capabilities, while BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management offers competitive pricing and dedicated support.

Features: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management provides automated asset management, a self-service catalog, and policy-driven resource management, offering a full lifecycle approach. Azure Monitor features advanced analytics, real-time alerts, and powerful integration capabilities, delivering superior insights into workloads.

Room for Improvement: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management could enhance its initial integration process and expand its monitoring features. Additionally, improving automation and analytics capabilities would make it more competitive. Azure Monitor can improve its visualization tools and streamline data export processes. Enhancements in user interface customization and pricing transparency would also benefit users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Azure Monitor offers an intuitive deployment model using Azure infrastructure, ensuring seamless integration and minimal setup effort. Its support is comprehensive, leveraging Azure’s extensive ecosystem. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management has a robust architecture that requires initial configuration. It benefits from dedicated support channels, ensuring effective problem resolution.

Pricing and ROI: BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management appeals with its lower setup costs and attractive ROI for lifecycle management-focused organizations. Azure Monitor, though potentially more expensive upfront, offers superior long-term value through extensive monitoring features that enhance operational insights. The higher initial investment is justified by its depth of features driving enhanced ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 857,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

3rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (5th)

BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

44th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Management (39th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 6.2%, down from 8.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Usman Khawar

Software Engineer (DevOps/ SRE) at Sensys LLC

Native integration simplifies monitoring but documentation and cost improvements are needed

The ease of access in Azure is significant since it's native to the platform and easy to integrate. It has no maintenance overhead, and users don't have to navigate to another portal to get their desired result. It's the handiness that it has, rather than the features. The interpretation from the logs and injection requires custom runbooks. While it's complex, many services provide native insights and workbooks. It does the basic job quite efficiently. They added new kinds of metrics with more integrations to send out metrics. They have even added support for third-party tools that can be integrated. Azure Monitor is working on improvements and becoming more mature. Azure Monitor is stable and scalable. Azure Monitor is evolving with new workbooks and dashboards.

Read full review

Entprssol67

Enterprise Solution Architect at Engineering Ingegneria Informatica SPA

Helps design blueprints in a cloud environment but the support is a major problem

One of the major problems is that support is not so good. I used to have a support expert in Spain but they left two years ago. BMC doesn't invest a lot in network automation but network automation is a major point in CLM. There aren't any experts here in Europe, maybe they have in America, I don't know. The main problem is the support in Europe. We had a lot of problems with the people who got put on our cases. The agents that we were assigned to were not so capable. They wanted to replicate the problem. If you have an incident, it takes a lot of time to troubleshoot the problem. The incident support is not so good. The technicians don't know the platform well. BMC doesn't want to invest in CLM. Two years ago we had a lot of problems. Maybe BMC realized that CLM is an end of life product.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Data exporting is easy, and this tool works seamlessly with other solutions. It's a stable and low-priced solution."

"The most valuable functions of Azure Monitor for our clients are its ability to monitor CPU usage and detect any potential issues before they escalate into actual problems. This helps in proactively addressing issues and preventing disruptions in our services. Additionally, Azure Monitor's integration with Azure for implementation has been quite straightforward and easy to manage."

"Provides an overview and high-level information."

"A product that is well-integrated for monitoring Microsoft Azure."

"Some good integration capabilities are present in the tool."

"I can conclude reports for the monthly, weekly, and peak time of the resources."

"The overall product rating is nine out of ten."

"The solution's most valuable features are its ability to focus on delivery and maximizing the performance of applications and services."

More Azure Monitor pros

"CLM has a multi-cloud portal because they have the resources to implement in various environments in various ports."

"Supports unattended installs and image-based, script-based, or template-based provisioning."

"Assesses change impact or completes an audit using multiple dashboard views."

"You can tie together your public and private cloud infrastructure into a "single pane of glass"."

"By allowing end users to request their own services, the request process for systems is much quicker and more accurate."

"Automates Java EE Application Deployment from an SCM system."

"Integrates role-based access control with pre-configured policies for CIS, DISA, HIPAA, PCI, SOX, NIST, and SCAP documentation and remediation."

Cons

"Integration with third-party tools from other vendors than Azure is more time-consuming"

"The onboarding process of certain assets and the overall UI can be improved in Azure Monitor"

"If it is configured incorrectly, you can end up with a huge bill."

"No improvements are needed from my perspective."

"Currently, it seems it's complicated to get the correct information in terms of what to do and how things work."

"The solution should have cross-connection or cross-communication between tech partners."

"As a younger product it still has room for feature improvement and enhancement."

"The length of latency is terrible and needs to be improved."

More Azure Monitor cons

"One of the major problems is that support is not so good."

"Needs integrations with other providers to provide a custom public cloud environment."

"The installation and configuration can be tricky due to it being built on Remedy."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Besides standard licensing fees the customer needs to additionally pay based on the ingested data size"

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"The cost of Azure Monitor application performance should be less expensive."

"The tool is expensive."

"Azure Monitor is cheaper compared to other third-party monitoring tools."

"Azure Monitor's price is minimal to the point of being almost negligible."

"Since we are using the basic set, it is more cost-effective compared to other third-party APM solutions."

"The solution’s pricing depends on how much logs it collects."

More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Monitor?

Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?

The primary challenge is the documentation. The major challenge that remains is the costing factor for the logs ingestion. The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Datadog vs Azure Monitor

Compared 22% of the time

Sentry vs Azure Monitor

Compared 14% of the time

Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor

Compared 13% of the time

Grafana vs Azure Monitor

Compared 11% of the time

New Relic vs Azure Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

More Azure Monitor Competitors

CloudBolt vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 61% of the time

Pandora FMS vs BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Compared 39% of the time

More BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor

June 2025

Download Azure Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

May 2025

Download BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management product report

Also Known As

No data available

BMC CLM

Overview

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

BMC's cloud management platform drives digital innovation with agile, full-stack service provisioning across cloud and traditional platforms. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management scales easily while integrating with essential compliance and governance policies to reduce risk.

BMC

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group

JDA Software, Morningstar, Orange Business Services, Wipro

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

June 2025

Free Report: Azure Monitor vs. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

857,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Monitor vs. BMC Cloud Lifecycle Management report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.