We performed a comparison between Azure Backup and Quest NetVault based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup was very easy."
"Enables immediate recovery and immediate restoration."
"It's very simple to configure which is very useful. It's not complex to configure it."
"It's stable."
"One of the most valuable features is security and connectivity to the data."
"There is only one feature, and that is the backup."
"I like that it's a stable solution and their support is good. I think Microsoft's commercial force is superior."
"The deployment process is quite easy in Azure."
"The solution allows us to block off our network and only give access to whatever we want."
"The platform helps us with efficient QoreStor deduplication (DD) capabilities and configuration."
"The user interface is good."
"If a job is pending, the solution communicates it to us through emails."
"It has File and SQL backup, which is the main benefit for us."
"Having the web-based interface is important to us because we can access it from any computer in the network, rather than having it installed and available for use only on a specific one."
"Its dashboard is quite well done. When you log into the GUI, you can basically see everything you need to know. There is also the possibility to edit the view as you like, which is great."
"The initial setup is straightforward. It's not that complicated. Deployment took maybe about 15 minutes."
"The only thing I would say that could be improved is the reporting."
"I can’t use the solution to restore another native cloud solution. Azure must add this new feature."
"The product could improve its performance."
"In the next release, I would like to see the ability to back up to different cloud providers."
"Azure Backup could improve the backup data copies because they are not immutable."
"We faced some issues synchronizing the information in Azure when the storage was changed."
"It can be further improved by continuously meeting its compliance requirements."
"The monitoring and tagging features could be improved."
"The interface can be improved. It should be more clear what features are available and make them easy to find."
"The stability of the solution is poor."
"The product’s SQL backup plugin needs improvement."
"In the next version, I would like to see support for the MongoDB database. As it is now, there is no component that works with it and we cannot back the data up using NetVault."
"The initial setup is a little complex."
"There are certain issues with the product that we report to Quest, and we get offered a workaround instead of a fix. There could be better interaction with the development teams, perhaps in terms of transparency."
"The storage capacity is very low."
"I would like to see the option of cloud-based management."
Azure Backup is ranked 7th in Backup and Recovery with 50 reviews while Quest NetVault is ranked 45th in Backup and Recovery with 10 reviews. Azure Backup is rated 7.8, while Quest NetVault is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Azure Backup writes "Straightforward to set up and manage and allows us to monitor all backups in one place". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest NetVault writes "Easy to use, stable, affordable pricing model, and good technical support". Azure Backup is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Rubrik, Commvault Cloud, Acronis Cyber Protect and Veritas NetBackup, whereas Quest NetVault is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Quest Rapid Recovery, Veritas NetBackup, Commvault Cloud and Acronis Cyber Protect. See our Azure Backup vs. Quest NetVault report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.