Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure Backup vs NAKIVO Backup & Replication comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
4.1
Azure Backup offers cost-effective savings with security, low upfront costs, and minimal storage fees, despite some dissatisfaction.
Sentiment score
7.8
<p>NAKIVO Backup &amp; Replication is praised for cost-effectiveness, fast deployment, and delivering significant time and cost savings.</p>
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Azure Backup’s support receives mixed feedback, with satisfactory service but issues like slow responses and varying expertise.
Sentiment score
8.4
<p>NAKIVO Backup &amp; Replication receives high praise for its fast, knowledgeable, and professional customer service, ensuring user satisfaction.</p>
The technical support from Microsoft is good
Their support is good and responsive when required.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Azure Backup offers scalable cloud-based storage, supporting various business sizes, with users reporting positive experiences and ratings between seven and ten.
Sentiment score
8.2
<p>NAKIVO Backup &amp; Replication offers scalable licensing, effortless storage expansion, and cross-platform compatibility for adaptable, efficient workload management.</p>
Azure Backup is scalable since it is a global solution.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
6.2
Azure Backup is praised for its high stability, consistent performance, and reliability, with success rates around 95%.
Sentiment score
7.9
<p>NAKIVO Backup &amp; Replication is highly stable, frequently updated, and operates reliably across diverse environments without major issues.</p>
I would rate the stability of Azure Backup as nine out of ten; it shows high stability in my experience.
Azure Backup is stable for Microsoft environments.
They are built with newer technology and processes, needing less support.
 

Room For Improvement

Azure Backup struggles with interface complexity, high costs, limited database support, slow restores, and inadequate multi-cloud flexibility.
NAKIVO needs better cloud integration, UI, application restores, virtual environment support, email alerts, updates, licensing, language, and encryption.
It is not a perfect tool for restoring SQL databases since it requires replacing everything instead of restoring specific files.
The reporting functionality of Azure Backup needs improvement.
The area that I believe needs improvement in Azure Backup is the restoring time.
They had given a feature of real-time replication which they stopped in NAKIVO.
 

Setup Cost

Azure Backup is viewed as moderately priced, offering value with a pay-as-you-go model but can be costly.
<p>NAKIVO Backup &amp; Replication is competitively priced and easy to manage, offering excellent value and features for enterprises.</p>
Azure Backup is expensive relative to the value we get from it.
The pricing of Azure Backup is fine; it is a low-cost solution.
The product is affordable even for smaller organizations.
 

Valuable Features

Azure Backup provides secure, cost-effective cloud integration with easy configuration, robust scalability, and efficient recovery, enhancing disaster recovery capabilities.
<p>NAKIVO Backup &amp; Replication excels in efficiency, user-friendliness, integration, and security, enhancing data protection while minimizing resource usage.</p>
The most valuable feature of Azure Backup is its simplicity.
It has a good impact on our cost savings and operational efficiency as it is a low-cost solution.
We use the normal features for Azure Backup, specifically to make backups of the VMs.
The VM, restore, and file recovery capabilities are considered gold standards.
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure Backup
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
10th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NAKIVO Backup & Replication
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
6th
Average Rating
9.4
Reviews Sentiment
8.0
Number of Reviews
89
Ranking in other categories
Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Azure Backup is 3.0%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NAKIVO Backup & Replication is 1.6%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Backup and Recovery
 

Featured Reviews

RituparnaBhattacharya - PeerSpot reviewer
Achieve cost savings and efficiency with high-level restore capabilities
I use Azure Backup mainly for backing up virtual machines The feature I find most effective in Azure Backup is the high-level restore. Additionally, it has a good impact on our cost savings and operational efficiency as it is a low-cost solution. The area that I believe needs improvement in…
Mattia Sangiorgio - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhances data protection strategies and ensures the reliability of backups with helpful support
The features we have found most valuable in NAKIVO Backup & Replication include its cost-effectiveness, seamless integrations, comprehensive functionalities, and ease of installation and management. The pricing model is very competitive, providing excellent value for the robust features offered. Its seamless integration with our VMware infrastructure ensures smooth operation without any compatibility issues. The wide range of functionalities, including incremental and full backups, storage optimization, and disaster recovery options, meets all our backup needs comprehensively. Moreover, the simplicity of installation and the intuitive user interface have made it easy for our team to quickly set up and manage the backups without requiring extensive training.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

How does Azure Backup differ from Veeam Backup & Replication?
Veeam has a version for Azure but there are organizations, like ours, that are considering moving to an Azure environment and wonder if Azure Backup is better than Veeam Backup and Replication (Vee...
What do you like most about Azure Backup?
Azure Backup is easy to configure and restore.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Backup?
The pricing of Azure Backup is fine; it is a low-cost solution.
How does Nakivo compare with Veeam Backup & Replication?
Nakivo is my favorite backup software. Below are the main benefits of Nakivo compared to Veeam 1. Low cost. 2. Backup storage with global deduplication (this is the main requirement of a backup sol...
What do you like most about Nakivo?
NAKIVO Backup &amp; Replication is very easy to use.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nakivo?
The product is affordable even for smaller organizations.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Somerset County Council, Kardem, PCL Construction
Coca Cola, Honda, 3M, University of Arizona, University of Maryland, University of Arkansas, Johns Hopkins University, Marriott, Radisson Hotels and Resorts, Fujifilm, Eiffage
Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Backup vs. NAKIVO Backup & Replication and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.