Azure Backup vs Catalogic DPX comparison

Microsoft and Catalogic are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Microsoft is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0, while Catalogic is ranked #76. Microsoft holds a 1.2% mindshare in BRS, compared to Catalogic’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution.

Azure Backup

Read 60 Azure Backup reviews

6,142 Views
5,896 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Catalogic DPX

Read 2 Catalogic DPX reviews

1,411 Views
1,326 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Azure Backup

Catalogic DPX

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

Catalogic DPX and Azure Backup are both effective data backup solutions, each with distinct advantages. Azure Backup appears to have the upper hand due to its advanced features and better scalability.

Features: Catalogic DPX is known for its reliability, data recovery speed, and cost-effectiveness. Azure Backup stands out for its scalability, integration with other Azure services, and a comprehensive set of advanced functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Catalogic DPX could improve its reporting, dashboard functionalities, and overall user experience. Azure Backup needs faster backup speeds, better handling of large datasets, and enhancements in managing large-scale backups.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Catalogic DPX is lauded for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service, though its user experience could be improved. Azure Backup also provides simple deployment but has mixed reviews on customer service. Catalogic DPX is favored for its support reliability, whereas Azure excels in deployment simplicity.

Pricing and ROI: Catalogic DPX offers competitive pricing with good ROI, making it a cost-effective solution. Azure Backup, while more expensive, justifies its higher cost through robust features, offering a worthwhile investment for comprehensive functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 902,988 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Azure Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Catalogic DPX

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

76th

Average Rating

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Azure Backup is 1.2%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Catalogic DPX is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Azure Backup	1.2%
Catalogic DPX	0.5%
Other	98.3%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

Sanjay Sahu

Project Manager at Capgemini

Has supported secure data storage with incremental backups and centralized monitoring

Azure Backup supports all the features that we need, so additional features are not an immediate need for me. The documentation for Azure Backup seems okay for me; it is good overall, but it should be more descriptive for each item. It should elaborate more on how backup and restore are fulfilled in different scenarios. One of the reviews indicates that Azure Backup needs improvements for specific backup options beyond just full VM snapshots. I believe it should be improved actually. Regarding specific backup options, I say there should be improvements compared to how they provided them in older days.

Read full review

it_user292722

Data Center Global SAP Operations Manager at a wholesaler/distributor with 1,001-5,000 employees

We use it to backup some high output critical physical servers, knowing that in case of disaster we could still recover to our VM environment. The user interface needs improvement.

The user interface needs improvement, the selection boxes to select a backup job are very small not adequate for managing 400+ backup jobs, we only see 8 job names in the small scroll window. The scheduler features are lacking, we must edit backup specs to reach the option to change the schedule. The new reporting feature has greatly improved the product, prior to this it was very difficult to have a full view of our backup schedules when scheduling a new job. Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix. We still see a lot of value in the product, but hope that the next few updates will not cause more issues... We wanted a mission critical enterprise solution, and sincerely hope that the future upgrades will bring the product back on track.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Azure Backup is the native backup capabilities."

"From a cost perspective, it is a very good solution because it doesn't need a lot of costs because it's only a matter of storage on the cloud."

"When it comes to Azure Backup, the advantage is that it's native and it's very easy to configure. We don't require a separate tool or manage something on a separate server. At the backend, it's managed by Microsoft itself, and we don't need to manage it."

"One of the most valuable features is security and connectivity to the data."

"With Azure Backup, you can readily make your environment if your setup somehow fails on the cloud or on-premises."

"The most valuable feature of Azure Backup is the file recovery and file vault."

"The initial setup was very easy."

"With a couple of buttons, we can configure a VM for a backup and use the wall service, the storage wall service, pretty seamlessly."

More Azure Backup pros

"By implementing an OVF (docker based) and without any agents on your servers, you’ll get a system which provides you with: Orchestration, Automation DR and Data analytics."

"Catalogic has great features including the ability to P2V from snapvaults, and recently the addition of agent-less backups for Linux."

Cons

"In Avamar, the file-based restores are very quick and fast, whereas, in Azure Backup, VM restore is super easy, but if I have to do a file or a folder restore, I have to mount the entire VM image. I have to wait for some time for it to be mounted, and then I have to go inside and then check the file and copy it somewhere. It's a bit of a manual process, whereas in Avamar, you can directly select a file and folder, and it'll recover with whatever permissions you want."

"For companies frequently accessing data or not using Microsoft Azure, the solution may not be very helpful."

"In the next release, I would like to see the ability to back up to different cloud providers."

"Lacks an AI system that would enable easier upgrading of the hardware."

"Azure Backup is limited to certain workloads. It would be helpful if Microsoft focused on enabling backups for Oracle and other unsupported databases."

"It still does not have a lot of customization, especially if your workloads are not in Azure."

"Technical support can be slow to respond at times."

"We faced some issues synchronizing the information in Azure when the storage was changed."

More Azure Backup cons

"And hearing about all these awesome posibilities, it kind of struck me that this was only possible with NetApp storage."

"Since the move from Syncsort to Catalogic, the quality control of upgrades has diminished and backups that used to work could not be restored without contacting Catalogic for a fix."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is not expensive."

"It is incredibly cost-effective and offers fixed pricing, with no additional fees for the licensing."

"There is a cost per terabyte for using this solution."

"We have enterprise-level pricing. I rate the pricing a five out of ten."

"The product is neither too expensive nor too cheap."

"Azure Backup is a moderately priced solution."

"Overall, its cost is better because the VMs are already there, and whatever you back up, there is only the additional cost of that storage, whereas if I have to use Avamar in Azure, a separate cost is there for the Avamar server, and in addition, whatever I take as a backup, there is a separate license with Avamar for that. So, there is a double cost if we have to use Avamar in the cloud."

"Considering the fact that our company's enterprise-sized customers use the solution, the product's price is fine and is not on the higher side of the spectrum."

More Azure Backup pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	24

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Azure Backup differ from Veeam Backup & Replication?

Veeam has a version for Azure but there are organizations, like ours, that are considering moving to an Azure environment and wonder if Azure Backup is better than Veeam Backup and Replication (Vee...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Backup?

The pricing of Azure Backup is fine; it is a low-cost solution.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Backup?

Azure Backup can be improved by providing an option and a utility so we can restore quickly instead of any manual intervention. Restoration times require manual backup and manual interventions, and...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Rubrik vs Azure Backup

Compared 12% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Azure Backup

Compared 10% of the time

N2W vs Azure Backup

Compared 6% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Azure Backup

Compared 6% of the time

N-able Cove Data Protection vs Azure Backup

Compared 4% of the time

More Azure Backup Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 16% of the time

Mimecast Insider Risk Management and Data Protection vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft DPM vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 9% of the time

Infrascale Backup & Disaster Recovery vs Catalogic DPX

Compared 7% of the time

More Catalogic DPX Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Backup

June 2026

Download Azure Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

June 2026

Download Catalogic DPX product report

Also Known As

No data available

BEX

Overview

Azure Backup provides efficient data protection with features like fast recovery and encryption. It integrates seamlessly with Azure services, offering scalable, secure storage solutions. Users benefit from straightforward configurations and flexible retention, although improvements in hybrid integration are needed.

Azure Backup stands out with its comprehensive data protection capabilities, including features such as incremental backups and geo-replication. It ensures consistent security and performance through its scalability and redundancy. Users find the platform cost-effective and appreciate its seamless integration with Azure services. While Azure Backup excels in many areas, such as ease of use and robust monitoring, challenges persist in hybrid environment integration and application-level backups.

What key features does Azure Backup offer?

Ease of use: Features straightforward configuration and incremental backups.
Fast recovery: Supports rapid data restoration with geo-replication.
Advanced protection: Provides encryption and flexible retention options for data security.
Seamless integration: Works well with Azure services for a unified experience.
User-friendly management: Offers robust monitoring and reporting tools.

What advantages should users expect from Azure Backup?

Cost-effectiveness: Provides affordable data protection solutions.
Scalability: Ensures consistent performance with cloud scalability.
Security: Enhances data security with advanced encryption features.
Efficiency: Simplifies backup processes with efficient scheduling.

Azure Backup is widely used in sectors requiring robust data protection, such as financial services, healthcare, and government. It is ideal for organizations looking to back up virtual machines, manage disaster recovery, or support cloud migrations. Its adaptability allows businesses to safeguard SAP workloads and SQL databases efficiently.

Microsoft

Catalogic DPX offers a robust data protection solution aimed at optimizing backup and recovery processes with efficiency and reliability. Designed to cater to complex IT environments, it ensures seamless data management and protection capabilities.

Intended for enterprises seeking comprehensive data protection, Catalogic DPX delivers advanced features for backup, recovery, and management of data across multiple platforms. The capacity to integrate seamlessly with current systems enhances its functionality, providing users with flexible, scalable solutions that accommodate dynamic business needs. This adaptability is critical in maintaining data integrity and agility in complex IT frameworks.

What are the most important features of Catalogic DPX?

Backup and Restore: Provides fast, reliable backup and restoration options.
Snapshot Management: Integrates with storage arrays for instant access to snapshots.
Replication: Ensures data availability through efficient data replication technologies.
Deduplication: Reduces storage requirements through advanced deduplication techniques.
Ransomware Protection: Offers robust security measures against ransomware threats.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Efficiency: Streamlines backup processes, reducing time and labor.
Cost Savings: Minimizes expenses related to storage and recovery operations.
Scalability: Adapts to growing IT demands without compromising performance.
Data Security: Ensures high standards of data protection across environments.

Businesses in industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing implement Catalogic DPX to manage vast amounts of critical data with ease. Its deployment supports compliance with industry-specific regulations, ensuring secure and efficient data handling tailored to unique business requirements.

Catalogic

Sample Customers

Russell Reynolds Associates, Somerset County Council, Kardem, PCL Construction

Hendrick Medical, CommonFund, Red-8, Fairfax County Schools, Tectrade, Storage Assessments

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

902,988 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.