"The most valuable features are the geo-restriction denials and the web ACL."
"Its best feature is that it is on the cloud and does not require local hardware resources."
"The solution is stable."
"Their technical support has been quite good."
"The most valuable features of AWS WAF are its cloud-native and on-demand."
"This is not a product that you need to install. You just use it."
"This product supplies options for web security for applications accessing sensitive information."
"The access instruction feature is the most valuable. This is what we use the most."
"A user-friendly and reasonably priced solution."
"The product offers high availability."
"We don't have much control over blocking, because the WAF is managed by AWS."
"The serverless product from AWS WAF could be improved. For example, they have only one serverless series, Lambda, but they should extend and improve it. Additionally, the firewall rules are not very easy to configure."
"We haven't faced any problems with the solution."
"The solution could improve by having better rules, they are very basic at the moment. There are more attacks coming and we have to use third-party solutions, such as FIA. The features are not sufficient to prevent all the attacks, such as DDoS. Overall the solution should be more secure."
"When users choose the free service, there isn't great support available to them."
"The setup is complicated."
"Technical support for AWS WAF needs improvement."
"While the complexity of the installation can vary from one service to another, overall, I would say that it and the configuration and navigation are somewhat complex."
"You need to have pretty good internal knowledge of the solution."
"Scalability should be based on customer requirements."
AWS WAF is ranked 4th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 12 reviews while Radware AppWall is ranked 19th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 2 reviews. AWS WAF is rated 7.6, while Radware AppWall is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "Use this product to make it possible to deploy web applications securely". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware AppWall writes "Stable with high availability and good dashboards". AWS WAF is most compared with Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Imperva Web Application Firewall, Azure Web Application Firewall, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall and Azure Front Door, whereas Radware AppWall is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, Fortinet FortiWeb and Akamai Kona Site Defender. See our AWS WAF vs. Radware AppWall report.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.