We performed a comparison between AWS WAF and Oracle Dyn Web Application Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."The simple configuration and the scalability have been most valuable. We are able to scale across all of our different AWS instances."
"It is Amazon. Everything is scalable. It is beyond what we need."
"The most valuable feature is the way it blocks threats to external applications."
"The product’s availability, ease of configuration, and documentation are valuable."
"The web solution effectively protects from vulnerabilities and cyber attacks."
"It is a one-click WAF with no effort needed."
"The tool’s stability is very good."
"The most valuable feature is that it is very easy to configure. It just takes a couple of minutes."
"The initial setup is pretty easy."
"I believe there is a need to move towards real-time analysis with the help of AI and intelligent systems in the future. This would reduce the reliance on manual work and enhance the functionality of detection protection. By incorporating AI-driven data analysis and data science techniques, we can improve the solution's user-friendliness, security compatibility, and accuracy."
"The user experience, the interface, is lacking. Sometimes it's hard to find certain areas that it has alerted on."
"The solution could be more reliable."
"The solution could improve by having better rules, they are very basic at the moment. There are more attacks coming and we have to use third-party solutions, such as FIA. The features are not sufficient to prevent all the attacks, such as DDoS. Overall the solution should be more secure."
"I would like to be able to view a graphical deployment map in the user interface that will give me an overview of the configuration and help to determine whether I have missed any steps."
"The area of reporting in the product needs to have a proper format."
"There is room for improvement in pricing."
"The solution should identify why it blocks particular websites."
"The solution should have a Data Mask for the next release. It would be helpful for banking institutions as they would be able to hide the server number of the ATM machine in the CPU."
Earn 20 points
AWS WAF is ranked 1st in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 52 reviews while Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is ranked 50th in Web Application Firewall (WAF). AWS WAF is rated 8.0, while Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS WAF writes "A highly stable solution that helps mitigate different kinds of bot attacks and SQL injection attacks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Dyn Web Application Security writes "Very secure with an easy initial setup and pretty stable". AWS WAF is most compared with Azure Web Application Firewall, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, F5 Advanced WAF, Imperva Web Application Firewall and Fortinet FortiWeb, whereas Oracle Dyn Web Application Security is most compared with .
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.