AWS Trusted Advisor vs Morpheus comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Morpheus Data are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.5, while Morpheus Data is ranked #8 with an average rating of 6.7. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.0% mindshare in CM, compared to Morpheus Data’s 7.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of Morpheus Data users who would recommend it.

AWS Trusted Advisor

Read 8 AWS Trusted Advisor reviews

563 Views
251 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Morpheus

Read 9 Morpheus reviews

3,036 Views
1,516 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

AWS Trusted Advisor

Morpheus

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Morpheus and AWS Trusted Advisor are cloud management solutions competing in the same category. Morpheus is known for its flexibility and support, while AWS Trusted Advisor is well-regarded for its comprehensive features, making it a preferred choice for cost-effective solutions.

Features: Morpheus provides robust automation, multi-cloud management, and analytics tools, supporting hybrid environments. AWS Trusted Advisor offers real-time insights, cost optimization, and security best practices, primarily targeting AWS infrastructure. Their focus diverges as Morpheus emphasizes cross-platform flexibility, whereas AWS Trusted Advisor concentrates on AWS-specific optimizations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Trusted Advisor integrates seamlessly with AWS services, simplifying deployment for AWS users and aligning support channels with other AWS services. Morpheus supports multiple cloud environments, involving a more complex setup, but offers strong customer service with multicloud expertise. AWS Trusted Advisor's ease of deployment is beneficial for AWS-focused organizations, while Morpheus suits those seeking wider cloud interoperability.

Pricing and ROI: Morpheus has higher initial setup costs but provides ROI through versatile cloud management, optimizing resource use across platforms. AWS Trusted Advisor, integrated into the AWS ecosystem, offers a cost-effective solution with excellent ROI for AWS resource optimization. This contrast shows Morpheus as more costly but versatile, while AWS Trusted Advisor offers value for AWS-centric businesses.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Trusted Advisor vs. Morpheus Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Trusted Advisor vs. Morpheus

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Trusted Advisor

Ranking in Cloud Management

16th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Morpheus

Ranking in Cloud Management

8th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of AWS Trusted Advisor is 1.0%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Morpheus is 7.9%, up from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

Optimizes cloud strategies with security and cost insights

Trusted Advisor offers features that provide inside information for the entire account, including identifying security gaps and offering cost optimization insights. The key features include security recommendations, cost optimization, and various packages to choose from, depending on the size of the company. It is especially beneficial for larger companies, as the tool provides a comprehensive view of account security, open ports, buckets, and offers recommendations for protection.

Read full review

MarkWittling

NFV Cloud Architect at a comms service provider with 10,001+ employees

Seamless upgrades, stable, and easy to deploy

We've been facing some challenges with Morpheus due to its design for public cloud usage. Their main focus is on allowing customers to deploy virtual machines to Azure, Google Cloud, AWS (and other private or public clouds they support). They provide features such as guidance and cost optimization. However, we're using Morpheus for on-prem v center clouds, which is probably not the user base norm. We are very pleased with the dashboard and multi-tenancy capabilities, but there are some challenges when deploying and configuring the more complex Telco workloads that have advanced networking. The integration of the NSX-T needs to be refactored. As I have been working on the API, there are some issues with the workflow engine in the automation that need to be addressed. For example, I need to be able to flag a task as fail or continue on fail if something goes wrong in the workflow. Currently, if one of the tasks in a twenty-task workflow fails, the remaining nineteen are not run, which can be a problem if one of those tasks is critical, such as when patching or doing security tasks. Thus, workflow enhancements and improvements are necessary. Morpheus desires the ability to control the full life cycle of a virtual machine from beginning to end. We have many vendors who want to establish virtual machines, but we want users to access them through Morpheus. We want the VMs to be provisioned from an external system and then be managed in Morpheus so users can only perform limited activities without being able to delete or provision them. We are currently working on resolving this issue, which I refer to as reconciliation. I have asked the developers to implement multi-tenancy, where each tenant has their own landing page at a unique URL. However, we are using groups, not tenants, so there are features we can do with tenants that we cannot do with groups. Specifically, I am trying to get the developers to add notifications support so that when a group member logs in to the Morpheus portal, they can be informed of their VMs' maintenance schedule at a specific time. This is a feature I have requested them to add. We are generally pleased with Morpheus, however, due to some restraints and restrictions, we are utilizing it differently than the majority of its users. This creates some difficulty.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would give it a ten out of ten."

"The cost optimization features are valuable."

"The recommendation feature is really good."

"AWS Trusted Advisor is a tool that we can use to optimize the AWS infrastructure cost."

"It is very stable."

"The cost optimization and security-related fixes in AWS Trusted Advisor have been great."

"Trusted Advisor scans the complete infrastructure within the account, providing a consolidated view of all services in use."

"I strongly recommend using Trusted Advisor due to its role in cybersecurity, providing cost-effective solutions compared to external companies."

More AWS Trusted Advisor pros

"The most beneficial features for us were the API integrations with various cloud vendors like Nutanix, VMware, AWS, Azure, and GCP. It saved us the effort of doing that work ourselves."

"Morpheus provides a very easy and one-click solution to scaling up and down."

"Provides a good automation platform."

"The most valuable feature for me was cost optimization."

"Morpheus is an intuitive solution that is very easy to use."

"The user interface of the application is exceptional."

"The multi-cloud integrations and the DevOps and operational integrations are the most valuable. Morpheus platform is a centralized set to manage different clouds and your on-premise platforms. It does a very good job of what it is designed to do. It is very good in terms of features. It is extremely stable and easy to install. It is also very scalable. Their support is also extremely good."

"It supports many features, and it also supports some of the automation that Cloudify supports. So, in addition to just giving you basic platform management—such as the ability to deploy virtual machines and have multitenancy to log in and perform all of your basic platform management tasks—it also supports automation. You can, for example, spin up three virtual machines, and you can have each virtual machine configure each other. You can do service chaining with it. You can run scripts in Dash and Python, or you can use tools like Ansible, Puppet, or Chef. All of this is just built into the tool. It is a very powerful tool."

More Morpheus pros

Cons

"Cost is a significant factor that needs improvement."

"The tenancy must be free for all metrics."

"The integration between Trusted Advisor and Security Hub sometimes lacks, and I need a way to ensure things come through there."

"For EC2 instances, we need to install the AWS CloudWatch agent to get the memory metric because we don't have a by-default memory utilization graph on cost optimization."

"Cost is a significant factor that needs improvement. Reducing the cost would make it more beneficial for all users."

"Maybe adding more security rules would be great."

"Trusted Advisor currently scans the whole system, including development, staging, and QA environments, which increases costs."

"Maybe if Trusted Advisor could also help us with IP address issues and the status of our VPCs, it would be beneficial."

More AWS Trusted Advisor cons

"The product has become overly complex. The biggest problem is that we find a bug, they fix the bug, but then another one pops up. We can never really deliver on the vision we had using Morpheus."

"There is room for enhancement in integrating Morpheus with other solutions."

"I faced a few problems while deploying."

"The tool could support virtual network functions better. It is really good at doing enterprise-type of things, but one of the things on which we're working with them is loading very complex virtual machines with it, such as Juniper SRX routers. It needs to support more complex virtualized resources a little bit better. Aside from that, it is a terrific tool. We really like it."

"The solution's pricing and customization need to improve."

"We had to put in much effort ourselves since Morpheus's support wasn't always available to help us."

"We've been facing some challenges with Morpheus due to its design for public cloud usage."

"Morpheus is working hard on creating an integration framework due for release in Q2 2021 which will allow clients to create their own interfaces and integrations into any 3rd party product that has a full-function API. Morpheus is also heavily focussed on enhancing the container management side to compete head-to-head with Openshift and CloudForms in Q3 2021."

More Morpheus cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Trusted Advisor offers various packages, with the most comprehensive costing $15,000 per month."

"The license is based on the number of virtual machines that Morpheus is managing. So, it is a pay-as-you-grow model."

"The solution is cheaper if you have less number of servers, but it becomes very expensive for a large number of servers."

"Morpheus doesn't directly support cost optimization, but its API integration can facilitate resource optimization. It doesn't dynamically optimize resources like an aeronautic system would; it operates step by step."

"Licensing is on an annual basis, and it is upfront for the year. There is no extra cost unless you want additional support or specific deployment packs."

"Initially, the license may seem like a good deal, but as we grow, it becomes costly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Real Estate/Law Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

17%

Educational Organization

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Trusted Advisor?

The Security Advisor is the most valuable feature. It instantly informs you about any system misconfigurations, and the best part is, it's completely free.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Trusted Advisor?

The cost of Trusted Advisor is reasonable, though it can be further economized by allowing selective scanning, focusing only on production systems, to avoid unnecessary costs associated with develo...

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Trusted Advisor?

Trusted Advisor currently scans the whole system, including development, staging, and QA environments, which increases costs. It would be better if it could selectively scan only production systems...

See all answers

What do you like most about Morpheus?

The most beneficial features for us were the API integrations with various cloud vendors like Nutanix, VMware, AWS, Azure, and GCP. It saved us the effort of doing that work ourselves.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Morpheus?

We've been a Morpheus customer since the early days. I know what they're trying to sell now, and you'd really need a strong use case to justify the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Morpheus?

The product has become overly complex. The biggest problem is that we find a bug, they fix the bug, but then another one pops up. We can never really deliver on the vision we had using Morpheus. We...

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Control Tower vs AWS Trusted Advisor

Compared 38% of the time

IBM Turbonomic vs AWS Trusted Advisor

Compared 31% of the time

CloudCheckr vs AWS Trusted Advisor

Compared 17% of the time

VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth vs AWS Trusted Advisor

Compared 14% of the time

More AWS Trusted Advisor Competitors

VMware Aria Automation vs Morpheus

Compared 22% of the time

CloudBolt vs Morpheus

Compared 16% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Manager (NCM) vs Morpheus

Compared 12% of the time

VMware Cloud Director vs Morpheus

Compared 7% of the time

Cloudify vs Morpheus

Compared 5% of the time

More Morpheus Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Trusted Advisor

June 2025

Download AWS Trusted Advisor product report

Buyer's Guide

Morpheus

June 2025

Download Morpheus product report

Also Known As

No data available

Morpheus Cloud Management Platform, Morpheus CMP

Overview

AWS Trusted Advisor is your customized cloud expert! It helps you to observe best practices for the use of AWS by inspecting your AWS environment with an eye toward saving money, improving system performance and reliability, and closing security gaps.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Morpheus is a 100% agnostic cloud management platform (CMP) designed from the ground up to unify management of multi-cloud and hybrid IT while empowering DevOps teams with self-service provisioning of bare metal, VM, and container-based application services.

Morpheus Data

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Morpheus CMP, mcdonalds, blackrock, HSBC, astrazeneca, arris, WGU, GBG, pennstate, beyondtrust

Buyer's Guide

AWS Trusted Advisor vs. Morpheus

June 2025

Free Report: AWS Trusted Advisor vs. Morpheus

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Trusted Advisor vs. Morpheus and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Trusted Advisor vs. Morpheus report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.