

AWS Glue and Rivery compete in the data integration space. AWS Glue appears to have an upper hand due to its extensive integration capabilities and real-time data processing.
Features: AWS Glue offers seamless integration with AWS services, automation, and scalability for real-time data processing. It supports custom scripts for data transformations and offers serverless functionality to optimize costs. Rivery provides a simple interface with strong documentation, versatile built-in and custom task flexibility, and robust connectors for numerous data sources.
Room for Improvement: AWS Glue has a steep learning curve and could benefit from clearer documentation and improved support for diverse transformations to handle cost issues with large data volumes. Rivery could enhance its graphical interfaces for easier understanding and adjust its pricing to become more accessible for smaller organizations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Glue supports a broad range of deployment scenarios and is known for positive customer service experiences, though its support response times could be improved. Rivery offers straightforward deployment options that are user-friendly for less technically-skilled users, with customer support being highly regarded despite pricing concerns.
Pricing and ROI: AWS Glue uses a pay-as-you-go pricing model, which appeals to larger enterprises but requires careful cost management for intense data workflows. Rivery’s pricing can be steep for smaller firms, thus making it necessary to tailor packages carefully. Both solutions’ ROI depends significantly on specific organizational requirements and usage patterns.
I advocate using Glue in such cases.
It saved my team time and really reduced manual work, so overall, it improved efficiency.
By using Snowflake and Rivery, I was able to set up and complete project goals myself without the necessity to employ additional data engineers or DevOps.
Upgrades occur every four months, and new developments coincide with version updates.
For complex Glue-related problems such as job failures or permission issues, their documentation is good, but having direct access to support helps cut down troubleshooting time significantly.
One significant challenge was implementing custom-built Python scripts using Rivery for transformations.
Customer support is great; they are answering really fast.
The customer support for Rivery is excellent.
It is beneficial to upgrade jobs, and we conduct extensive testing in development before migrating to production.
It can easily handle data from one terabyte to 100 terabytes or more, scaling nicely with larger datasets.
It has handled growing data volumes and additional pipelines without major issues.
The focus is on the ability to connect to different sources and to put all the data together.
AWS Glue is highly stable, and I would rate its stability as nine.
I found the tool very easy to use, allowing me to gain a lot of insights.
The excellent support we received from Rivery team contributes to this perception.
Migrating jobs from version 3.0 to 4.0 can present compatibility issues.
With AWS, I gather data from multiple sources, clean it up, normalize it, de-duplicate it, and make it presentable.
A more user-friendly and simpler process would help speed up the deployment process.
As an end-to-end solution for ETL with Snowflake, Rivery has proven to be reliable and efficient in my day-to-day work.
Agentic AI with open source tools can be used to build all configurations automatically for pipelines.
One feature that stood out in Informatica was the ability to see data flowing through each transformation step while debugging, which I felt was missing in Rivery.
Costing depends on resource usage, and cost optimization may involve redesigning jobs for flexibility.
AWS charges based on runtime, which can be quite pricey.
The smallest cost for a project is around €700, while the largest can reach up to €7,000 based on the scale of the usage.
I found myself asking my stakeholder to make it only five times a day because it was really expensive.
I found the pricing and licensing to be fair and competitive compared to other solutions I have seen.
For ETL, I feel the performance is excellent. If I create jobs in a standard way, the performance is great, and maintenance is also seamless.
AWS Glue's most valuable features include its transformation capabilities, which provide data quality and shape for processing in ML or AI models.
AWS Glue has reduced efforts by 60%, which is the main benefit.
Rivery saved time and money because everything was handled in one place by only one or two data people instead of using the resources of a development team, which is great, and all the knowledge is handled in one team.
The main benefit Rivery brought to my organization was the time we were able to save on development.
Rivery has positively impacted my organization by reducing the need for a big team of data engineers and speeding up the work when we need to connect to a new data source; this can happen really fast.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| AWS Glue | 7.4% |
| Rivery | 1.5% |
| Other | 91.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 12 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 34 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service offering seamless integration with AWS services like S3, Redshift, and Athena. Known for its flexibility with data formats and automation of ETL tasks, AWS Glue enhances data management and transformation.
AWS Glue facilitates seamless data extraction, transformation, and loading for businesses, integrating with key AWS services, allowing efficient data pipeline automation. It's valued for a user-friendly GUI, scalability, and cost-effectiveness, supporting PySpark for complex datasets and includes a robust data catalog, real-time backup capabilities, and code generation. Despite its strengths, improvements are needed in documentation, training, and broader programming language support. Users face challenges with its complex interface and integration with non-AWS products, driving demand for enhancements in its usability and performance.
What are AWS Glue's most important features?Businesses leverage AWS Glue in industries for ETL processes, data integration, and transformation. It is used to optimize data lakes or warehouses integration, enhancing data cataloging and real-time integration. Its serverless feature enables efficient data processing in sectors like finance and healthcare, where handling complex data-intensive tasks is crucial.
Rivery enhances automation with its built-in pipelines, seamless Snowflake integration, and flexible data management capabilities. It supports extensive connectivity and user-defined functions, aiding efficient data flow management.
Rivery provides a robust platform for automating data ingestion and transformation workflows, integrating effortlessly into data warehouses like Snowflake. Its user-friendly interface and extensive API connectivity simplify data extraction and flow, accommodating diverse needs with custom scripting and user-defined functions. Despite its strengths, improvements are desired in lineage, impact analysis, and advanced visualization, along with better orchestration and logging capabilities. Users also seek price adjustments for smaller organizations and integration with modern AI technologies to elevate analytical capabilities.
What features does Rivery offer?In industries such as retail and finance, Rivery is crucial for managing ETL processes. Retail organizations use it for integrating data from sales channels and customer databases, driving targeted marketing strategies. Finance companies rely on its robust pipelines and Snowflake integration to streamline complex financial data transformations and enhance reporting accuracy.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.