AWS Control Tower vs Juniper AppFormix comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Juniper are both solutions in the Cloud Management category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0, while Juniper is ranked #24 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 1.3% mindshare in CM, compared to Juniper’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Juniper users who would recommend it.

AWS Control Tower

Read 18 AWS Control Tower reviews

789 Views
789 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Juniper AppFormix

Read 2 Juniper AppFormix reviews

169 Views
167 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

AWS Control Tower

Juniper AppFormix

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Juniper AppFormix and AWS Control Tower are competing in cloud management and automation. AWS Control Tower has an advantage with its comprehensive features and ecosystem integration.

Features: Juniper AppFormix offers real-time performance monitoring, predictive analytics, and detailed visibility into resource utilization. AWS Control Tower provides comprehensive governance, multi-account management, and automated security compliance within AWS environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AWS Control Tower offers straightforward deployment with pre-configured blueprints and automation tools, benefiting from AWS's robust support infrastructure. Juniper AppFormix provides detailed insights with more complex integration due to multi-cloud support and is noted for responsive customer service and detailed technical guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Juniper AppFormix offers flexible pricing with scalable solutions tailored to enterprise needs, promoting favorable ROI through in-depth analytics. AWS Control Tower may have higher initial setup costs but provides a strong ROI through comprehensive management capabilities and reduced operational overhead.

To learn more, read our detailed AWS Control Tower vs. Juniper AppFormix Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

AWS Control Tower vs. Juniper AppFormix

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

AWS Control Tower

Ranking in Cloud Management

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Juniper AppFormix

Ranking in Cloud Management

24th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Management category, the mindshare of AWS Control Tower is 1.3%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Juniper AppFormix is 0.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Control Tower	1.3%
Juniper AppFormix	0.5%
Other	98.2%

Cloud Management

Featured Reviews

MuhammadAzhar Khan

Senior DevOps Engineer at Alibaba Group

Unified security management ensures comprehensive compliance for account safety

Control Tower offers many valuable features for managing all account security. I can manage user security and user IAM, firewall, and other security-related tasks via Control Tower. The unified security management is a crucial aspect, and whenever an AWS organization is used, Control Tower is typically included to ensure comprehensive compliance fulfillment.

Read full review

Ankur Chauhan

Founder and CEO at OogyNW Consultancy

Good scalability, useful in terms of collective analytics, and low latency

For a hybrid cloud area, I see some issues when on the hybrid cloud; you want to use this kind of solution. It doesn't work great everywhere. If it's a complete solution from them, then it's very great. But when it's a hybrid cloud I'm trying to make, then I find some issues here. Moreover, my expectations were probably slightly more for the third-party tool integration; for example, regarding the analytics, I had some different tools. So, integration was not as good as I was expecting. So, analytics, configuration tool I was not really happy. So, there is room for improvement in context with integration with existing tools in our network environment.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"AWS Control Tower helps to save a lot of work and manage multiple accounts."

"It is incredibly user-friendly and functions seamlessly."

"AWS Control Tower helps companies save costs."

"Security is the most valuable feature of Control Tower."

"It provides centralized solutions for all AWS accounts in one place, customized to meet the organization's specific needs."

"It aligns well with the customer's needs and it ultimately fosters a strong customer-company relationship."

"It offers automated recommendations for security and policies, creating a landing zone and providing a list of policies."

"I would rate the solution a 10 out of 10."

More AWS Control Tower pros

"The solution's technical support is good."

"It's a stable product. I didn't find any issues with regard to stability. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

Cons

"The solution's stability could be improved."

"The integration with other AWS functions has room for improvement."

"The tool's setup is very technical. Its pricing can be cheaper."

"The initial setup is complex."

"It is essential to clarify that this isn't necessarily a drawback of the service, but having a clear and concise set of predefined guidelines from AWS for moving existing accounts under AWS Control Tower would be highly beneficial as it would simplify the process and make it more user-friendly."

"There aren't any additional features that I feel are missing. However, it's worth noting that Control Tower seems to function as a layer utilizing standard AWS products in the background. Occasionally, the interface may appear less streamlined, with changes in layout based on the underlying products being used. While this doesn't impact functionality, having a more standardized user interface, irrespective of the background products, could enhance the user experience."

"While using the solution recently, it broke a certain activity. So, AWS Control Tower needs to consider making the solution better."

"There should be more automation security tools in the Control Tower."

More AWS Control Tower cons

"My expectations were probably slightly more for the third-party tool integration; for example, regarding the analytics, I had some different tools. So, integration was not as good as I was expecting. So, analytics, configuration tool I was not really happy. So, there is room for improvement in context with integration with existing tools in our network environment."

"This solution has a yearly licensing. In my country, it's really expensive."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I believe it's free of charge or comes at a very low cost. It's an additional feature. Even if there is a fee, it's minimal. AWS seems to assist customers in gaining a comprehensive view of their security setups within AWS. Using Control Tower is highly recommended, especially as your company grows and involves Active Directory, various departments, and different architectural aspects. It becomes more advisable to leverage Control Tower rather than managing these aspects manually, especially for larger organizations."

"AWS Control Tower is not really that expensive."

"It is cost-effective and the associated cost is quite minimal."

"It operates on a pay-as-you-go model, meaning we are charged only for the services we actively use within it."

"It is expensive but it is an investment in my opinion."

"The cost is reasonable, but there are opportunities for improvement in terms of pricing for larger enterprises."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing an eight."

"The pricing structure is closely intertwined with the specifics of your environment and the billing strategy you employ."

More AWS Control Tower pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	7

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about AWS Control Tower?

The most intriguing feature is the automatic generation of user accounts. Leveraging Active Directory and global company settings, AWS Cloud Tower enables the creation of AWS user accounts based on...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AWS Control Tower?

Control Tower within the AWS Organization does not have a charge. It is free and does not incur additional charges.

See all answers

What needs improvement with AWS Control Tower?

I believe AWS Control Tower could be improved. I compare it with Huawei Cloud's enterprise project, which is a similar concept but different implementation. In Huawei Cloud, you partition in one si...

See all answers

What do you like most about Juniper AppFormix?

It's a stable product. I didn't find any issues with regard to stability. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Juniper AppFormix?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Juniper AppFormix?

It's for hosting the telecom workloads. It is for cloud management. This solution has positively impacted real-time analytics and improved our system's performance. Although, it wasn't very much te...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sangfor HCI - Hyper Converged Infrastructure vs AWS Control Tower

Compared 37% of the time

AWS Trusted Advisor vs AWS Control Tower

Compared 32% of the time

Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control vs AWS Control Tower

Compared 31% of the time

More AWS Control Tower Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

AWS Control Tower

October 2025

Download AWS Control Tower product report

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Management

October 2025

Download Juniper AppFormix product report

Overview

AWS Control Tower offers the easiest way to set up and govern a new, secure, multi-account AWS environment. It establishes a landing zone that is based on best-practices blueprints, and enables governance using guardrails you can choose from a pre-packaged list.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

AppFormix is an optimization and management software platform for public, private and hybrid clouds. This intent-driven software manages automated operations, visibility, and reporting in cloud and Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) use cases for Kubernetes and OpenStack, as well as Amazon Web Services. It features machine learning-based policy and smart monitors, application and software-defined infrastructure analytics, alarms, and chargeback accounting.

Juniper

Sample Customers

Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers

Rackspace, PlusServer

Buyer's Guide

AWS Control Tower vs. Juniper AppFormix

September 2025

Free Report: AWS Control Tower vs. Juniper AppFormix

Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Control Tower vs. Juniper AppFormix and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our AWS Control Tower vs. Juniper AppFormix report.

See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.