AWS Control Tower vs Juniper AppFormix comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
1,098 views|734 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Juniper Logo
89 views|64 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Control Tower and Juniper AppFormix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Management Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"AWS Control Tower helps to save a lot of work and manage multiple accounts.""With Control Tower, there are ready-to-use automated templates available, simplifying the implementation of a centralized management solution.""It provides centralized solutions for all AWS accounts in one place, customized to meet the organization's specific needs.""Security is the most valuable feature of Control Tower.""Compliance is the most valuable feature.""It aligns well with the customer's needs and it ultimately fosters a strong customer-company relationship.""One of the standout advantages is the fine-grained control it offers in terms of permissions and privileges.""AWS Control Tower helps companies save costs."

More AWS Control Tower Pros →

"The solution's technical support is good.""It's a stable product. I didn't find any issues with regard to stability. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."

More Juniper AppFormix Pros →

Cons
"The initial setup is complex.""By making APIs and organizational units more centralized, it would be simpler to pinpoint the source of issues in case of a breach and would ultimately benefit everyone involved.""The product's affordability depends on the value it brings to specific organizations.""AWS Control Tower should improve its fast execution. It also needs more tools for triggering and monitoring AWS services. AWS Control Tower needs more tracking as well.""The tool's setup is very technical. Its pricing can be cheaper.""While using the solution recently, it broke a certain activity. So, AWS Control Tower needs to consider making the solution better.""The integration with other AWS functions has room for improvement.""The process of closing an AWS account using Control Tower needs improvements to simplify it, especially when managing multiple accounts."

More AWS Control Tower Cons →

"This solution has a yearly licensing. In my country, it's really expensive.""My expectations were probably slightly more for the third-party tool integration; for example, regarding the analytics, I had some different tools. So, integration was not as good as I was expecting. So, analytics, configuration tool I was not really happy. So, there is room for improvement in context with integration with existing tools in our network environment."

More Juniper AppFormix Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution is free."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the pricing an eight."
  • "The product's affordability depends on the value it brings to specific organizations."
  • "It is expensive but it is an investment in my opinion."
  • "AWS Control Tower is not really that expensive."
  • "The pricing is efficient, not overly expensive but also not very cheap."
  • "The cost is reasonable, but there are opportunities for improvement in terms of pricing for larger enterprises."
  • "It operates on a pay-as-you-go model, meaning we are charged only for the services we actively use within it."
  • More AWS Control Tower Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most intriguing feature is the automatic generation of user accounts. Leveraging Active Directory and global company settings, AWS Cloud Tower enables the creation of AWS user accounts based on… more »
    Top Answer:I believe it's free of charge or comes at a very low cost. It's an additional feature. Even if there is a fee, it's minimal. AWS seems to assist customers in gaining a comprehensive view of their… more »
    Top Answer:There aren't any additional features that I feel are missing. However, it's worth noting that Control Tower seems to function as a layer utilizing standard AWS products in the background… more »
    Top Answer:It's a stable product. I didn't find any issues with regard to stability. I would rate the stability a ten out of ten.
    Top Answer:For a hybrid cloud area, I see some issues when on the hybrid cloud; you want to use this kind of solution. It doesn't work great everywhere. If it's a complete solution from them, then it's very… more »
    Top Answer:It's for hosting the telecom workloads. It is for cloud management. This solution has positively impacted real-time analytics and improved our system's performance. Although, it wasn't very much… more »
    Ranking
    11th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    1,098
    Comparisons
    734
    Reviews
    15
    Average Words per Review
    586
    Rating
    8.3
    28th
    out of 75 in Cloud Management
    Views
    89
    Comparisons
    64
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    621
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Control Tower offers the easiest way to set up and govern a new, secure, multi-account AWS environment. It establishes a landing zone that is based on best-practices blueprints, and enables governance using guardrails you can choose from a pre-packaged list.

    AppFormix is an optimization and management software platform for public, private and hybrid clouds. This intent-driven software manages automated operations, visibility, and reporting in cloud and Network Functions Virtualization (NFV) use cases for Kubernetes and OpenStack, as well as Amazon Web Services. It features machine learning-based policy and smart monitors, application and software-defined infrastructure analytics, alarms, and chargeback accounting.

    Sample Customers
    Expedia, Intuit, Royal Dutch Shell, Brooks Brothers
    Rackspace, PlusServer
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Educational Organization9%
    Government8%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise65%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Management
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management. Updated: April 2024.
    768,924 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Control Tower is ranked 11th in Cloud Management with 15 reviews while Juniper AppFormix is ranked 28th in Cloud Management with 2 reviews. AWS Control Tower is rated 8.2, while Juniper AppFormix is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of AWS Control Tower writes "A robust protection for efficient cloud governance and security". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper AppFormix writes "Good scalability, useful in terms of collective analytics, and low latency ". AWS Control Tower is most compared with AWS Trusted Advisor, Oracle Enterprise Manager Cloud Control, VMware Aria Automation, Morpheus and VMware Aria Cost powered by CloudHealth, whereas Juniper AppFormix is most compared with .

    See our list of best Cloud Management vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.