GitHub vs Liquibase comparison

GitHub and Liquibase are both solutions in the Version Control category. GitHub is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.0, while Liquibase is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. GitHub holds a 6.5% mindshare in VC, compared to Liquibase’s 2.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GitHub users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Liquibase users who would recommend it.

GitHub

Read 94 GitHub reviews

1,637 Views
680 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Liquibase

Read 3 Liquibase reviews

624 Views
221 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

GitHub

Liquibase

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

GitHub and Liquibase cater to different aspects of software development; GitHub is a repository hosting service, while Liquibase involves database schema management. GitHub holds an advantage in general pricing and support due to its broad adoption and strong community. Liquibase, however, shines with advanced database change management features.

Features: GitHub offers version control, collaboration tools, and integrations supporting continuous integration and deployment. Liquibase provides automated database schema management, sophisticated change tracking, and version control for databases.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: GitHub simplifies deployment with its user-friendly web-based platform and integration with various development tools, backed by resourceful documentation and community support. Liquibase requires more specialized knowledge for deployment, offering comprehensive documentation and professional customer support to aid in complex setups.

Pricing and ROI: GitHub offers flexible pricing plans suitable for individual developers and enterprises, potentially delivering high ROI through its collaborative capabilities. Liquibase, while more costly, offers targeted ROI for organizations needing strong database change management due to its specialized features.

To learn more, read our detailed GitHub vs. Liquibase Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Liquibase

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

GitHub

Ranking in Version Control

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (7th)

Liquibase

Ranking in Version Control

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Version Control category, the mindshare of GitHub is 6.5%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Liquibase is 2.9%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Version Control

Featured Reviews

Pervez Roy

Solutions Architect at Small Systems LTD

Very good for collaboration on software projects

We use GitHub for code repository alongside Bitbucket GitHub is very good for collaboration on software projects. We prefer Bitbucket for commercial use, while GitHub is used for open source. You can get the differences, history of changes, and version control for various pull requests. You can…

Read full review

Sudheer Kumar Jamjam

Technical Lead Cloud DevOps Engineer at Deloitte

Offers integration with multiple databases, stable product and reduced our manual intervention

I would recommend using it. To learn Liquibase, one should have some database knowledge. If the person is from a DBA background, they would be able to learn quickly. But if they are from an application or infrastructure role, it's medium complex. Before getting started, you should thoroughly go through the documentation and follow the latest changes deployed by the Liquibase product team. Basically, when using the product, you should be able to understand it and stay updated on the latest releases. Overall, I would rate the product a nine out of ten. Organizations should have this kind of tool to reduce manual intervention. The one point they could improve on is documentation, which they haven't clarified, and they need to work on that a lot.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Any complex banking can be handled very easily in GitHub. It allows us to integrate with tools like Grid, where we can merge and resolve conflicts without any hassle."

"I have found GitHub stable."

"The ease of use is valuable."

"I appreciate saving from Visual Studio Code that implements changes directly on GitHub."

"I like the CI/CD features."

"The most valuable aspects of GitHub are version control and parallel development. I also appreciate the forking part, which allows us to release a specific set of features to the environment."

"The most valuable features of GitHub include its ability to integrate with Jira and multiple CI/CD platforms like Techton, allowing for seamless project management."

"We use GitHub as a repository."

More GitHub pros

"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."

"The solution is easy to use, and it has very clear documentation."

"It will be useful for teams to automate and reduce manual work."

Cons

"It is currently only from the development perspective. It doesn't have features related to project management and testing. It is not like Azure. So, there is a lot of room for improvement. It is a version control product, and it would be good if they can come up with a complete DevOps product."

"It would be better if the amount of storage were increased."

"In complex cases, we have to use the terminal for conflict resolution. If those conflicts could be resolved visually in the editor, that would be much better."

"Sometimes we do not get the exact solution, and the suggested solution does not work, so GitHub could improve in that area."

"The solution needs some more controls for deleting code."

"I would like to see more security where a plugin was available for us to update in relation to security."

"The solution could have better support for the Markdown language."

"The onboarding process could be simplified."

More GitHub cons

"The pricing is quite high."

"We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue."

"One thing we faced issues with is that Liquibase does not show the exact error, which added to the complexity."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company purchased it. Before, we used to receive the free version, but then they purchased some of the features."

"The licensing model from GitHub is very clear."

"The product is reasonably priced."

"I use the free version of the tool."

"The price of this solution is reasonable."

"Regarding pricing, I'd rate it eight out of ten. It's decent and not too expensive, and small businesses can also afford it. With AWS taking CodeCommit out of the market, I don't see many competitors for small companies in terms of GitHub."

"It is open-source. There is no license for GitHub."

"GitHub is an open-source product, but when using the free-to-use version, anyone can see the code we're working on."

More GitHub pricing and cost advice

"Liquibase is an open-source solution."

"The pricing is fair."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Version Control solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

30%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about GitHub?

The control is the most valuable feature as developers can work on a single code.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for GitHub?

The pricing of GitHub depends on the choice of solutions, such as building one's own GitHub Runners to save money or using GitHub's Runners with extra costs. The pricing is considered reasonable an...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GitHub?

There are still areas for improvement with GitHub Actions and their deployment workflows, as they have made significant progress but are not yet polished. Occasionally, stability can be an issue, t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Liquibase?

Liquibase is an open-source solution. If you are using Liquibase, you need to update its license. I think Liquibase is affordable for our organization.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Liquibase?

We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Liquibase?

I have worked on the Liquibase commands, Liquibase updates, Liquibase storeback, and some basic commands from Liquibase. We were using the Docker image installed from the AWS CI/CD, downloading thi...

See all answers

Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub

Compared 16% of the time

Snyk vs GitHub

Compared 12% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs GitHub

Compared 11% of the time

AWS CodeCommit vs GitHub

Compared 8% of the time

More GitHub Competitors

DBmaestro Database Source Control vs Liquibase

Compared 36% of the time

Bitbucket vs Liquibase

Compared 24% of the time

Bitbucket Server vs Liquibase

Compared 14% of the time

Git vs Liquibase

Compared 13% of the time

More Liquibase Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

GitHub

June 2025

Download GitHub product report

Buyer's Guide

Version Control

June 2025

Download Liquibase product report

Overview

GitHub is a web-based Git repository hosting service. It offers all of the distributed revision control and source code management (SCM) functionality of Git as well as adding its own features. Unlike Git, which is strictly a command-line tool, GitHub provides a Web-based graphical interface and desktop as well as mobile integration. It also provides access control and several collaboration features such as bug tracking, feature requests, task management, and wikis for every project.

GitHub

Liquibase is a migration-based open source database version control solution that relies on a changelog to track what changesets have been deployed to a database, and what additional changesets needs to be applied to a database in order to migrate a database schema to a specific version. Liquibase supports an XML model for defining changesets so that database schema changes can easily be translated to another DBMS platforms. As an open source solution, Liquibase is ideal for smaller teams and projects or for teams that have ample time to invest in extending and adapting the open source capability to meet their needs.

Liquibase

Sample Customers

Dominion Enterprises, NASA, Braintree, SAP, CyberAgent

Nike, JP Morgan Chase, Bancolombia, UPS, Anthem

Buyer's Guide

GitHub vs. Liquibase

June 2025

Free Report: GitHub vs. Liquibase

Find out what your peers are saying about GitHub vs. Liquibase and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GitHub vs. Liquibase report.

See our list of best Version Control vendors.

We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.