We performed a comparison between GitHub and Liquibase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control."The code sharing and updated history are valuable features."
"All the features are valuable, but the most important feature is that GitHub has advanced security. The second important feature is the capability to create custom GitHub actions and the capability to deploy in different types of architectural infrastructures, such as hybrid, private, or public."
"GitHub provides good time reduction and this is what I value the most."
"I did not have any issues with the stability of Github. It worked seamlessly."
"During our use of GitHub, we have not encountered any problems and GitHub adds new features frequently."
"The code versioning is excellent, and having a detailed log, including every change made to the code by every developer, is invaluable. It makes it so that if there is a bug or problem in the product channel, we can find exactly where it happened and how to fix it."
"It is really simple to set up."
"GitHub is good for collaboration because everyone can access it or we can restrict access to a few users. If I upload a file and share the URL, it's not restricted to a set number of users. Everyone with the link can download the files."
"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."
"There can be conflict issues when two developers work on the same file or line of code, and it would be great to see that improved, possibly with an AI solution."
"GitHub could expand the limits of the free version."
"The ticketing system is not working."
"The development team pushes the code into a repository, and the CI/CD pipeline will perform the build. We need open-source libraries to perform the builds. It would be helpful to have the ability to link to open-source libraries like npm libraries. I don't know if GitHub Actions provides this. I would like to see that in GitHub Actions if they don't."
"The project management sector really needs some improvement for GitHub. I don't know if GitHub made sense for me as a project manager."
"The initial setup and implementation could be easier, I had some difficulties with it at first but I don't have a development background."
"The initial setup requires heavy documentation which can be challenging for new developers."
"The GitHub repository needs an upgraded user interface and overall UI improvements."
"The pricing is quite high."
Earn 20 points
GitHub is ranked 3rd in Version Control with 64 reviews while Liquibase is ranked 7th in Version Control. GitHub is rated 8.6, while Liquibase is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of GitHub writes "Beneficial version control and continuous integration, but guides would be helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Liquibase writes "A unique product that is easy to implement, with great automation capabilities ". GitHub is most compared with Snyk, AWS CodeCommit, Atlassian SourceTree, Bitbucket and Fortify on Demand, whereas Liquibase is most compared with Bitbucket, Git and DBmaestro Database Source Control.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
