Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aware IM vs QuickBase comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aware IM
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
88th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
QuickBase
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
12th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (16th), Employee Time Tracking Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Aware IM is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 2.2%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
QuickBase2.2%
Aware IM0.3%
Other97.5%
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Use Aware IM?
Leave a review
Morgan Victor - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Test Engineer at Roche
Automation has transformed project and inventory workflows and improves revenue forecasting
The best features QuickBase offers include being a no-code software, meaning it is very easy to use even for new users. It also provides life cycle management, workflow management, and dashboards. The dashboards and workflow management help my team significantly, as they have a drag-and-drop interface and prebuilt templates, which play a pivotal role in creating custom applications. Those features also help provide the ability to manage the entire application life cycle with QuickBase easily. Integration has been very seamless with our overall IT stack. The user interface is very user-friendly and intuitive, which makes it very easy to use, together with the no-code aspect. Any kind of personnel can use this tool easily.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
883,712 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
17%
Marketing Services Firm
7%
Construction Company
6%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business40
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise28
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about QuickBase?
The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?
I did not have any involvement with pricing, setup cost, or licensing.
What needs improvement with QuickBase?
The table size limits are small for really large apps. While I agree that there needs to be a cap on the size, it would be nice to adjust it up when needed. Also, the cost can be a bit prohibitive,...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Quick Base, TSheets
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Aetna 2. Adobe 3. ADP 4. Airbus 5. Amazon 6. American Express 7. Amex 8. Apple 9. ATT 10. Autodesk 11. Bank of America 12. Barclays 13. BASF 14. Bayer 15. BlackRock 16. Boeing 17. BNP Paribas 18. Cisco 19. CocaCola 20. Comcast 21. ConocoPhillips 22. Constellation Brands 23. Credit Suisse 24. Danone 25. Dell 26. Deutsche Bank 27. Eni 28. ExxonMobil 29. Ford 30. GE 31. Google 32. H&M
Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OutSystems, Mendix and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: February 2026.
883,712 professionals have used our research since 2012.