Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aware IM vs QuickBase comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aware IM
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
88th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
QuickBase
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
13th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
75
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (18th), Employee Time Tracking Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Aware IM is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QuickBase is 2.1%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
QuickBase2.1%
Aware IM0.3%
Other97.6%
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

Use Aware IM?
Leave a review
RS
Associate principal engineer at a tech vendor with 5,001-10,000 employees
Empowers content management and application creation without SQL
The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for improvement in front-end functionalities. I cannot deploy and use front-end features anywhere; they must be deployed inside Quick Base. The introduction of hooks would allow for easier deployment elsewhere, such as GitHub. Additionally, their APIs have limitations, such as reliance on XML for backend APIs, which restricts their utility.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
13%
Computer Software Company
7%
Performing Arts
7%
Comms Service Provider
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business38
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise23
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about QuickBase?
The most valuable feature of QuickBase is its dynamic form capabilities. These forms allow backend automation, making tasks like updating data based on specific conditions much easier.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for QuickBase?
Pricing could be cheaper. I rate it around a seven out of ten. Mainly larger companies use it, which influences the pricing structure.
What needs improvement with QuickBase?
The user interface of Quick Base is complex. It can be difficult to navigate, and ideally, it should be simplified to facilitate use by anyone, not just certified individuals. There is room for imp...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Quick Base, TSheets
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Aetna 2. Adobe 3. ADP 4. Airbus 5. Amazon 6. American Express 7. Amex 8. Apple 9. ATT 10. Autodesk 11. Bank of America 12. Barclays 13. BASF 14. Bayer 15. BlackRock 16. Boeing 17. BNP Paribas 18. Cisco 19. CocaCola 20. Comcast 21. ConocoPhillips 22. Constellation Brands 23. Credit Suisse 24. Danone 25. Dell 26. Deutsche Bank 27. Eni 28. ExxonMobil 29. Ford 30. GE 31. Google 32. H&M
Procter & Gamble, Tesla, Norwegian Cruise Line, Google, Metso, Agero, Kayak, PTC, Patra Corp, TomTom, Southwest Airlines, FedEx Office
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, OutSystems, Mendix and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: January 2026.
879,711 professionals have used our research since 2012.