We performed a comparison between Avantra and Azure Monitor based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of Avantra is automation. The reduction of manual work and having them automated is one of the top reasons why I would use it."
"It's very easy to manage and use."
"You can customize alerts based on need."
"Technical support is good and helpful...The initial setup is easy."
"The tool's most valuable feature is the alert system, which can be set according to our metrics. The integration is smooth."
"The solution has tons of valuable features."
"The dashboard allows us to easily track various metrics and quickly understand the overall health of our system."
"Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment."
"The tools for logs and metrics are pretty good and easy to use."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is that it's stable. It hasn't crossed any thresholds."
"The dashboard needs to improve."
"The machine-learning is lacking and should be improved."
"We are currently exploring automation options for various areas, and Avantra should consider implementing automation for change request management, an area they have not yet ventured into. While Avantra is currently excelling in monitoring and system refreshes, there is scope for improvement in automating change request management. In addition to primarily focusing on SAP, Avantra currently performs kernel patches which are core SAP patches. However, exploring more into OS patching could be another potential area for Avantra to expand its automation capabilities."
"Azure Monitor could improve network performance monitoring and make it more advanced."
"The solution should have cross-connection or cross-communication between tech partners."
"Automation related to gathering metrics from more applications could be improved."
"I would like more transparency when we use the solution with another environment, like on-premises, or on another cloud environment, like AWS or GCP."
"In my opinion, they should improve the overall user experience, especially when it comes to indexing and searching collective logs."
"We encounter some difficulties in monitoring the operating system on its own."
"It's really complex to retrieve or query the logs in Azure Monitor."
"They need to work on a more hybrid deployment that will allow us to monitor local on-premise deployments and connect to different systems. I would like to see more integration."
Avantra is ranked 39th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 5 reviews while Azure Monitor is ranked 4th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 44 reviews. Avantra is rated 8.6, while Azure Monitor is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Avantra writes "User-friendly, simple to set up and easy to configure". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azure Monitor writes "A powerful Kusto query language but the alerting mechanism needs improvement". Avantra is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and OpsRamp, whereas Azure Monitor is most compared with Datadog, Dynatrace, Prometheus, Sentry and Grafana. See our Avantra vs. Azure Monitor report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.