Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs DX NetOps comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.9
Auvik Network Management increases efficiency with automation, reducing downtime, costs, and manual tasks despite some concerns about pricing.
Sentiment score
6.3
DX NetOps enhances network visibility, reduces downtime, optimizes performance, lowers operational costs, and improves efficiency with an intuitive interface.
Auvik Network Management saves me 40% to 50% of our time.
It can save you the cost of the product by reducing expenses and downtimes in 12 to 18 months.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.9
Auvik Network Management's customer service is praised for responsiveness and knowledge, despite occasional delays in complex issue resolutions.
Sentiment score
4.7
DX NetOps customer service quality fluctuates by region, especially post-Broadcom acquisition, with mixed satisfaction and improvement potential.
They were knowledgeable and responded quickly with accurate and useful information.
Auvik always responds on the same day.
They introduced the product to us and explained how to deal with it.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Auvik excels in scalability and ease of use, though managing multiple locations can present challenges for some users.
Sentiment score
8.2
DX NetOps excels in scalability, ideal for managing extensive telecom networks, with minor limitations noted by some users.
The platform scales well and supports our organizational needs.
It was capable of handling all those clients perfectly.
The product is very scalable, to the maximum.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Auvik Network Management offers high stability, minimal downtime, quick issue resolution, and improved reliability over traditional on-premises solutions.
Sentiment score
9.5
DX NetOps is praised for its stability and reliability, scoring high for bug-free and consistent long-term performance.
I have been wondering if Auvik Network Management is built on modern web technology because it is pretty fast and queries things quickly.
In terms of stability, I would rate Auvik Network Management as a ten out of ten, as it does not experience jitter or other major issues.
I rate the stability of the product as ten on a scale of one to ten, indicating that it is very stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Auvik users seek improved reporting, smoother interface, accurate mapping, better vendor integration, enhanced automation, and organized network visualization.
DX NetOps needs improved support, UI enhancements, advanced features, optimized hardware, and more AI for better network management.
Enhancements in API functionality and wider tool support for integration with PSA or RMM tools.
Auvik does a good job of nesting those devices. For example, a bunch of different servers will all be nested in one icon on the map, and when opened up, all those multiple servers can be seen.
We were unable to integrate Auvik with a geographical map, which limited our ability to track issues to specific buildings on campus.
It would be useful to have more AI features.
 

Setup Cost

Auvik Network Management offers flexible pricing per device, praised for cost-effectiveness and robustness, though some find it steep.
DX NetOps offers subscription-based pricing with integrated solutions, flexible licensing, and discounts, catering to various business needs.
Auvik is pricey, and we were paying a lot for it, especially when compared to SolarWinds.
I would categorize its pricing as good.
The pricing was a little bit higher.
The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market.
 

Valuable Features

Auvik Network Management enhances visibility, troubleshooting, and oversight with features like mapping, integration, automation, and comprehensive monitoring.
DX NetOps offers robust network issue analysis with AI-powered automation, providing comprehensive monitoring, scalability, and resource tracking support.
I have real-time network visibility, where all devices such as hubs, routers, firewalls, and servers are in one place for me to check.
Auvik Core's ease of use also enhanced troubleshooting speed and efficiency.
We can go to different places and monitor, check, configure, and analyze traffic.
The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data.
 

Categories and Ranking

Auvik Network Management (ANM)
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
189
Ranking in other categories
IT Infrastructure Monitoring (3rd), Network Troubleshooting (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd), Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) (2nd)
DX NetOps
Ranking in Network Monitoring Software
44th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
AIOps (17th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Auvik Network Management (ANM) is 0.9%, down from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of DX NetOps is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Monitoring Software
 

Featured Reviews

Jeremy Campbell - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables us to get on top of issues before they become an outage
When I change IP addresses on a device or on a server, I have to wait for Auvik to figure out that change. It will tell me the device is offline until Auvik scans the whole subnet again and finds it. If I change 25 devices, I'll get 50 emails in a short time because they've gone offline. I'd love the ability to change that where I can update that device with the IP address without it going offline. That goes against the idea of a system that dynamically scans. It's information overload sometimes when you need to change a bunch of factors. You get inundated with emails. I would almost love a button whenever you first log in that says maintenance window, and then it would maybe take some of those alerts away. It's fairly intuitive but sometimes you have to search for things because it's hidden in the user interface, so I think that could be improved a little bit. The search could be better because they have these strange search terms. Instead of being able to look for what you want, you have to lay out the query in a specific way to get results. We've also been dealing with some weird bugs lately. We get alerts on miscellaneous items that go offline and online all the time. I've reached out to support, and they said that they've got a fix that they rolled out. However, we're still experiencing the issue, so I've got to work with them to fix that. They seem to be on top of the support.
Mark Tukh - PeerSpot reviewer
Leverages comprehensive network monitoring and AI-driven automation for enhanced performance analysis
There is a model for network traffic analysis in the NetOps product called NetOps Flow Analyzer. It provides all the necessary protocols and analysis. DX NetOps supports network monitoring across hybrid environments, though I hope it works out of the box. The product features include automation through AI, allowing out-of-the-box analysis of performance data, building baseline trends, and enabling configuration of dynamic thresholds relative to collected data.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
20%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Auvik?
The most valuable feature for us in Auvik is the network topology.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Auvik?
Auvik is pricey, and we were paying a lot for it, especially when compared to SolarWinds.
What needs improvement with Auvik?
The network maps can be confusing due to the wide scope of the network, making it difficult to find specific details. Improvements in the network exclusions part would be helpful, as well as enhanc...
What do you like most about DX NetOps?
It is straightforward to configure, and you can quickly gather data from your infrastructure.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for DX NetOps?
The licensing cost of DX NetOps is expensive, not very affordable, and on the top of the price range in the market. However, there are no extra expenses in addition to the standard licensing fee.
What needs improvement with DX NetOps?
It would be useful to have more AI features.
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Fujitsu
Find out what your peers are saying about Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. DX NetOps and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
850,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.