Automox vs Tenable Vulnerability Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Automox Logo
284 views|197 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Tenable Logo
13,395 views|10,776 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automox and Tenable Vulnerability Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Vulnerability Management Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Its flexibility is most valuable.""They've been adding some new features lately, which I'm not nearly as familiar with, but the ability to just deploy patches and exempt certain machines from certain patches is helpful. For instance, for our servers, we may not want to roll out zero-day patches. We are able to exempt those and make sure that they don't get those policies. We've got certain servers that have to run a particular version of Java, and being able to exempt those servers from receiving Java updates is pretty fantastic.""Among the most valuable features are its ease of use and the Worklets. Both of them are time-savers. Worklets enable us to customize things for a given environment. It's something like when Apple lets other people create applications. Other peoples' Worklets can be used in our environment and in our customers' environments. That saves a lot of time, and it's really cool.""Coming from prior solutions that were a lot more effort, Automox's patch management abilities are transformational. When I took over patching at my company, they were using on-premise architecture to patch. As the workforce shifted from being in the office into their home offices, I was able to lift and shift with no effort other than deploying the new agent out into the environment.""The fact that it's just one product that can patch multiple operating systems is really great.""The flexibility in creating tools to make changes on remote machines is most valuable to me. The reporting feature is also fantastic because on any given day I can bring up a list of machines that don't have patches, for example. Or I can bring up a list of machines that are in my environment on a certain day. The solution helps me with not only my own role, and what I look for internally myself, but it also helps during audits. I can go in and look at the number of machines in there, and their owners and timelines. It certainly helps tell a story for anything that IT requires.""It's super easy to use and we haven't found anything easier.""Previously, we would run a report, scan it, and compare it. We were spending 15 to 30 minutes a month on each machine on this stuff because you would find stuff that wasn't up to date, then you had to fix it. This solution takes that time down to minutes. Automox saves us easily many hours a month."

More Automox Pros →

"It is pretty stable. I would rate it nine or maybe ten.""There is no burden of updating or upgrading this solution.""The interface is fine.""You can customize each point in new scans.""The solution's most valuable feature is providing a single pane of visibility on all the infrastructure and its status.""A new user can easily understand the workflow, even if they are creating users for other divisions and the user is a beginner.""The initial setup is straightforward so long as your infrastructure, components, and networks are in place.""It is very stable, and it is updated periodically by adding new vulnerabilities."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pros →

Cons
"The stability has come a long way from what it was like when it started and now it's really good.""Asset management would be a great feature to add to Automox. We would run easier scripts or more out of the box scripts that would help us in audits. \""The only thing that we've ever truly wanted is an onsite repository. Currently, all updates are provided directly from the internet. So, if you have 1,000 devices, all 1,000 devices go directly out to the internet. We would love the option of being able to put the updates on local storage so that we're not consuming as much bandwidth. That is literally the only thing that we've ever wanted.""They need to improve the automation features.""We would like to see additional detailed reporting for Service providers like us. We had to build our own reports via their APIs to meet our needs.""The biggest area they need to fix, without a doubt, is the ability to copy and sync profiles and worklets between all of the organizations you manage, and the ability to have top-level user access control across all of the companies that you manage.""There should be better inventory capabilities. Right now, they only allow you to have insight into software out-of-the-box. It would be nice to also extend that into custom inventory that can be modified and managed by the practitioner.""It should have integrated workstation access. So, there should be a remote desktop feature."

More Automox Cons →

"An area of improvement for this solution is being able to customize the dashboard. For example, the dashboard does not allow us to view a previous months vulnerability results alongside current results to make comparisons.""The product is a bit expensive.""It can have more integration.""The solution must provide penetration testing.""They need to have more dependable and faster support.""The pricing of the solution could be more reasonable.""The solution is a bit slow.""The initial setup is complex and has room for improvement."

More Tenable Vulnerability Management Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We are on the premium licensing, which is the one that has the API capability that we use."
  • "There are no additional costs in addition to the extended licensing fees with Automox. You get your support and your per endpoint license with what you purchased."
  • "For all these software tools, it is usually a subscription model. There is a monthly charge that we need to pass along to our clients because we are doing all this for their benefit. It is only a couple of bucks a month per computer, and that is a low enough price point where our clients, without exception, have accepted it, and said, "This is great. We will pay that. It sounds like a worthwhile thing.""
  • "The pricing and licensing costs have been great for us... My advice to others who are evaluating or thinking of implementing Automox is to give it a shot. If a free trial is still available, definitely use it, because it makes life a lot easier."
  • "The product is a great value."
  • "Automox just charges us a set amount per user, per month, for using the product. That is very important to us. Because it's a cloud-native solution, you're saving on the cost of hosting an on-premises solution on your servers."
  • "We're doing it annually directly through Automox. It is per endpoint. It is $2 and some change per endpoint, but I believe the cost is right around $28,000. Everything is covered in this fee."
  • "Its licensing for a year was nine grand. There was no additional fee."
  • More Automox Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "There are additional features that can be licensed for an additional cost."
  • "The solution is not too expensive."
  • "Tenable.io Vulnerability Management's pricing solution model isn't great."
  • "The total cost we pay for this solution is over 45K. This is for a large education organization."
  • "Compared to other VM solutions, Tenable.io Vulnerability Management is expensive."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high price, I rate the pricing an eight. So, it is a pretty expensive solution."
  • "Tenable.io is not known for being a cheap product."
  • "A yearly payment has to be made toward the solution's licensing costs."
  • More Tenable Vulnerability Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's easy to deploy agents to endpoints.
    Top Answer:We do pay a monthly licensing fee. I'd rate the pricing as average. It's not cheap yet not too expensive. You can also pay for more support if you require them to provide consultancy services.
    Top Answer:They need to improve the automation features. It could be more stable.
    Top Answer: Tenable Nessus is a vulnerability assessment solution that is both easy to deploy and easy to manage. The design of the program is such that if a company should desire to handle the installation… more »
    Top Answer:The integration of Tenable into our security ecosystem was very good.
    Top Answer:I'm not satisfied with the reporting structure. We cannot do much customization. We can do it in Tenable.sc. We need to maintain two different solutions. We need the on-premise tool for reporting… more »
    Ranking
    35th
    Views
    284
    Comparisons
    197
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    444
    Rating
    7.0
    2nd
    Views
    13,395
    Comparisons
    10,776
    Reviews
    26
    Average Words per Review
    463
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Tenable.io
    Learn More
    Overview

    Facing growing threats and a rapidly expanding attack surface, understaffed and alert-fatigued organizations need more efficient ways to eliminate their exposure to vulnerabilities. Automox is a modern cyber hygiene platform that closes the aperture of attack by more than 80% with just half the effort of traditional solutions.

    Cloud-based and globally available, Automox enforces OS & third-party patch management, security configurations, and custom scripting across Windows, Mac, and Linux from a single intuitive console. IT and SecOps can quickly gain control and share visibility of on-prem, remote and virtual endpoints without the need to deploy costly infrastructure.

    Automox dramatically reduces corporate risk while raising operational efficiency to deliver best-in-class security outcomes, faster and with fewer resources.

    Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.

    Sample Customers
    Information Not Available
    Global Payments AU/NZ
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company15%
    Retailer8%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Government6%
    REVIEWERS
    Security Firm24%
    Government12%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Financial Services Firm12%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization23%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Government9%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business60%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise24%
    Large Enterprise50%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business53%
    Midsize Enterprise3%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise32%
    Large Enterprise50%
    Buyer's Guide
    Vulnerability Management
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: March 2024.
    768,740 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Automox is ranked 35th in Vulnerability Management with 10 reviews while Tenable Vulnerability Management is ranked 2nd in Vulnerability Management with 38 reviews. Automox is rated 8.8, while Tenable Vulnerability Management is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Automox writes "Monitors our devices irrespective of the location and the environment, allows us to exempt certain machines from certain patches, and has perfect patch management abilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Vulnerability Management writes "Discovers vulnerabilities and integrates well with other solutions". Automox is most compared with Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Configuration Manager, BigFix, Tanium and ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus, whereas Tenable Vulnerability Management is most compared with Tenable Security Center, Tenable Nessus, Qualys VMDR, Amazon Inspector and Microsoft Defender Vulnerability Management.

    See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.

    We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.