Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z vs Agility comparison

You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z and Agility based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Release Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z vs. Agility report (Updated: September 2022).
633,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "You get what you pay for. Don't let your development teams dictate what the portfolio management team should use as the main tool."
  • "Comparing the pricing to other products, I think this solution is in the middle."
  • More Agility Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Release Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    633,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:With some of the other tools, you have to buy 20 different plugins to get to the same capability that comes with the basic Agility capability.
    Top Answer:We pay an annual fee based on a certain number of users and a rate that they gave us based on the number of users. Comparing the pricing to other products, I think this solution is in the middle. We… more »
    Top Answer:There is room for improvement in getting the analytics portion of the solution more integrated with the rest of it. The feature I would like to see is already in their newer licensing structure, and… more »
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Average Words per Review
    out of 32 in Release Automation
    Average Words per Review
    Also Known As
    VersionOne Lifecycle, VersionOne, CollabNet VersionOne, Continuum
    Learn More
    Video Not Available

    Modernize your legacy systems.
    We live in the online world. The way of business and technology seems to be all mobile and cloud these days. Nevertheless, mainframes remain paramount and integral to core business transactions worldwide and are here to stay.

    At CA Technologies we feel that continuous delivery for the mainframe holds the key to digital transformation with minimal disruption. The mainframe needs to be connected to your continuous delivery pipelines and DevOps practices in order to be completely agile and responsive to business demands.

    At present most mainframe users face significant challenges that hinder agility:

    Driven by manual interactions–ISPF panels initiate CLIST scripts
    Collaboration of multiple Dev and Ops teams involving lots of processes and procedures
    Applications written many years ago in COBOL and other legacy languages
    Treating the mix of mainframe and distributed apps found in most services differently with dedicated change processes and toolsets
    Mitigating risk and ensure compliance in a highly regulated environment
    Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z connects digital and mainframe applications, automates them and incorporates them in an automated workflow.

    Enterprise business agility rests on agile planning that scales and has the flexibility needed to meet the needs of customers and the market. Agility enables organizations to scale up agile from the team level across the product portfolio, improve collaboration and efficiency, and deliver software that provides more value.

    Learn more about Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z
    Learn more about Agility
    Sample Customers
    Siemens Health Services (HS), Cerner Corporation, Aaron's, Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, Kelley Blue Book, AOL, Axway, Tideworks, bwin Interactive Entertainment, AG, Intergraph, Eos Group, PeopleCube, Liquid Machines
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    Computer Software Company21%
    Insurance Company10%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise80%
    Buyer's Guide
    Release Automation
    September 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Red Hat, GitLab and others in Release Automation. Updated: September 2022.
    633,952 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is ranked 31st in Release Automation while Agility is ranked 4th in Release Automation with 4 reviews. Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is rated 0.0, while Agility is rated 9.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Agility writes " A scalable, full-package solution with a tech support team that bends over backwards to help". Automic Continuous Delivery for IBM Z is most compared with , whereas Agility is most compared with Jira, Rally Software, Jira Align, Microsoft Azure DevOps and IBM Engineering Workflow Management.

    See our list of best Release Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Release Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.