Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aurea CX Messenger vs Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS comparison

Aurea and Red Hat are both solutions in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category. Aurea is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0, while Red Hat is ranked #13. Aurea holds a 0.7% mindshare in MQ, compared to Red Hat’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aurea users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Red Hat users who would recommend it.
Aurea CX Messenger
Read 7 Aurea CX Messenger reviews
  • 192 Views
  • 66 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS
Read 1 Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS review
  • 90 Views
  • 70 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Message Queue (MQ) Software
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 849,963 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aurea CX Messenger
Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software
9th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Business Activity Monitoring (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (12th), SOA Governance (3rd), Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) (7th)
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS
Ranking in Message Queue (MQ) Software
13th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Message Queue (MQ) Software category, the mindshare of Aurea CX Messenger is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is 0.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Message Queue (MQ) Software
 

Featured Reviews

Radhey Rajput - PeerSpot reviewer
Lightweight and efficient solution
It's very good and lightweight. But, it does not provide web service communication. But it is excellent for internal connections One valuable feature is the messaging broker. If there is a disruption, it restores the messages. And when the application is running, it delivers all the messages. The…
Read full review
AR
It's scalable and easy to use, and we have local support here in Tunisia
We have an application-presentation layer, and we use JBoss to communicate with the application layer. The interceptors use Active MQ.  JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support.  JBoss could add more automation. We have been using JBoss for five…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution offers excellent stability."
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support."
 

Cons

"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"JBoss could add more automation."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscription"
"The pricing is not so high."
"Much better than Oracle SOA Suite."
Information not available
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Computer Software Company
17%
Insurance Company
8%
Retailer
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aurea CX Messenger?
The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aurea CX Messenger?
The pricing is not so high. I will rate it a seven out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest. There are no additional fees to the standard license.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Aurea CX Messenger?
The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services because the earlier version is not using web service and cloud functionality. If Aurea could include these features in the fut...
See all answers
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

TIBCO eFTL vs Aurea CX Messenger Logo
TIBCO eFTL vs Aurea CX Messenger
Compared 52% of the time
IBM MQ vs Aurea CX Messenger Logo
IBM MQ vs Aurea CX Messenger
Compared 48% of the time
More Aurea CX Messenger Competitors
Apache Kafka vs Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS Logo
Apache Kafka vs Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS
Compared 100% of the time
More Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Business Activity Monitoring
April 2025
Aurea CX Messenger reportDownload Aurea CX Messenger product report
Buyer's Guide
Message Queue (MQ) Software
March 2025
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS reportDownload Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS product report
 

Also Known As

CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
No data available
 

Overview

CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

Aurea

To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS extends the capabilities to our Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solution, Red Hat OpenShift, for messaging services in the cloud.

Red Hat
 

Sample Customers

Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
Buyer's Guide
Message Queue (MQ) Software
March 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
849,963 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.