We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger and Mule ESB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need."
"The solution offers excellent stability."
"SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required."
"The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages."
"The Messenger Broker is a really good feature."
"ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all."
"The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot."
"The most valuable feature is the Salesforce integration."
"Mule Expression Language"
"Easy connectivity and easy integration."
"We can use Java expressions anywhere in the flow."
"The most valuable features of Mule ESB are its ease of use, documentation, ease to adapt to newer security and vulnerabilities, and a lot of help available. Additionally, there is a lot of flexibility, many patches available, and they provide APIs. They are a market standard."
"This tool has exceptional API management and integration connectors in addition to multiple out of the box connectors."
"Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc."
"I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."
"Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs"
"You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely."
"The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services."
"The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API."
"The stability could be improved."
"There are some features on the commercial version of the solution that would be great if they were on the community version. Additionally, if they added more authorization features it would be helpful."
"In an upcoming release, I would like to see more additional concept for exception handling, batch processing, and increased integration with other application."
"The solution's setup needs to be a bit more straightforward and its support needs to respond faster."
"It's not easy to troubleshoot and we still can't make it work."
"The payment system needs improvement."
"The Anypoint platform consumes a lot of memory, and it would be great for developers if it were more lightweight."
"Lacking some connectors that could be included."
Aurea CX Messenger is ranked 12th in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 7 reviews while Mule ESB is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 45 reviews. Aurea CX Messenger is rated 9.0, while Mule ESB is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Aurea CX Messenger writes "Lightweight and efficient solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule ESB writes "Plenty of documentation, flexible, and reliable". Aurea CX Messenger is most compared with TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, whereas Mule ESB is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, Oracle Service Bus, Oracle SOA Suite, Red Hat Fuse and webMethods Integration Server.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
