"ActiveMQ is very lightweight and quick."
"JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support."
"From the TPS point of view, it's like 100,000 transactions that need to be admitted from different devices and also from the different minor small systems. Those are best fit for Kafka. We have used it on the customer side, and we thought of giving a try to ActiveMQ, but we have to do a lot of performance tests and approval is required before we can use it for this scale."
"JBoss could add more automation."
ActiveMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is ranked 12th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review. ActiveMQ is rated 10.0, while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ActiveMQ writes "Lightweight and quick solution for microservices intercommunication". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS writes "It's scalable and easy to use, and we have local support here in Tunisia". ActiveMQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, IBM MQ, VMware RabbitMQ and Anypoint MQ, whereas Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is most compared with Apache Kafka and IBM MQ.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.