IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • ActiveMQ vs. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS

ActiveMQ vs Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"ActiveMQ is very lightweight and quick."

More ActiveMQ Pros →

"JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support."

More Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS Pros →

Cons
"From the TPS point of view, it's like 100,000 transactions that need to be admitted from different devices and also from the different minor small systems. Those are best fit for Kafka. We have used it on the customer side, and we thought of giving a try to ActiveMQ, but we have to do a lot of performance tests and approval is required before we can use it for this scale."

More ActiveMQ Cons →

"JBoss could add more automation."

More Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We are using the open-source version, so we have not looked at any pricing."

    • More ActiveMQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    610,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about ActiveMQ?
    Top Answer:ActiveMQ is very lightweight and quick.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with ActiveMQ?
    Top Answer:For Kafka, we mainly use it for event sourcing. We have huge concurrent events. From the TPS point of view, it's like 100,000 transactions that need to be admitted from different devices and also from… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What is your primary use case for ActiveMQ?
    Top Answer:We are using ActiveMQ in our customers' companies, so all of the integrations are there. We use this solution for microservices intercommunication.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What do you like most about Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS?
    Top Answer:JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support.
    What needs improvement with Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS?
    Top Answer:JBoss could add more automation.
    What is your primary use case for Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS?
    Top Answer:We have an application-presentation layer, and we use JBoss to communicate with the application layer. The interceptors use Active MQ.
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 19 in Message Queue (MQ) Software
    Views
    12,433
    Comparisons
    8,509
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    489
    Rating
    10.0
    12th
    out of 19 in Message Queue (MQ) Software
    Views
    231
    Comparisons
    199
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    172
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    AMQ
    Learn More
    Apache
    Red Hat
    Overview

    Apache ActiveMQ is the most popular and powerful open source messaging and Integration Patterns server.

    Apache ActiveMQ is fast, supports many Cross Language Clients and Protocols, comes with easy to use Enterprise Integration Patterns and many advanced features while fully supporting JMS 1.1 and J2EE 1.4. Apache ActiveMQ is released under the Apache 2.0 License

    To respond to business demands quickly and efficiently, you need a way to integrate the applications and data spread across your enterprise. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ—based on the Apache ActiveMQ open source project—is a flexible, high-performance messaging platform that delivers information reliably, enabling real-time integration and connecting the Internet of Things (IoT).

    Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS extends the capabilities to our Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS) solution, Red Hat OpenShift, for messaging services in the cloud.

    Offer
    Learn more about ActiveMQ
    Learn More
    Learn more about Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    University of Washington, Daugherty Systems, CSC, STG Technologies, Inc. 
    E*TRADE, CERN, CenturyLink, AECOM, Sabre Holdings
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm38%
    Transportation Company25%
    Energy/Utilities Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company25%
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Comms Service Provider14%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Educational Organization8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise60%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise75%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise82%
    Buyer's Guide
    Message Queue (MQ) Software
    June 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Apache, Solace and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: June 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    610,812 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    ActiveMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is ranked 12th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review. ActiveMQ is rated 10.0, while Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ActiveMQ writes "Lightweight and quick solution for microservices intercommunication". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS writes "It's scalable and easy to use, and we have local support here in Tunisia". ActiveMQ is most compared with Apache Kafka, IBM MQ, VMware RabbitMQ and Anypoint MQ, whereas Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is most compared with Apache Kafka and IBM MQ.

    See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.

    We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.