Coming October 25: PeerSpot Awards will be announced! Learn more

AuraQuantic vs IBM BPM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AuraQuantic Logo
985 views|753 comparisons
IBM Logo
14,647 views|11,729 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and IBM BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed AuraQuantic vs. IBM BPM report (Updated: September 2022).
632,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration.""AuraPortal has the best price for its process.""AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."

More AuraQuantic Pros →

"IBM BPM is a stable solution.""IBM BPM's best features include document sharing, management document creation, widget and barcode creation, and integration.""The most valuable feature for the organization is the Document Store.""It provides a very robust environment to build an integration framework or workflow patterns that we have. A lot of changes or modifications have been made to this solution over the past few years. The features that they have added this time have helped developers like us to work on the developmental environment and leverage all the capabilities of the tool. This is what I like about this solution.""The installation was straightforward.""It is a very powerful solution.""IBM's deployment box is one huge black box. We can create all the services with our own code or without a codebase, however, we have a huge amount of space with practically no limitation.""Its workflow and integration with SAP are the most valuable features. It is also a stable solution."

More IBM BPM Pros →

Cons
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved.""More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help.""One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."

More AuraQuantic Cons →

"The front end is not customised for a good user experience.""The coaches and the user interface are the areas that can be improved a lot. It is good in terms of data processing, but the UI, scripting, and coaches are not very user-friendly and developer-friendly. Performance is always an issue. The scripting and the pattern that it uses are very tedious for new developers to understand, and it takes time to master it in depth. When comparing IBM BPM with IBM APN, a lot of things are provided out of the box in IBM APN. We don't have to write code or a Java connector to make a functionality work. It would be very helpful and time-saving for developers if IBM BPM is improved in this area to provide many functionalities or drag-and-drop options so that the developers don't have to write the code.""IBM BPM integrated with Spark UI and the UI is now much better, but they still need to improve the UI because competitors have predefined templates and other additional features. In these competitor's solutions, you are able to use the templates, map your data, and the form is ready to use. With this solution, you need to write a lot of code to have the same quality as the competitor's templates. It would be a benefit to make this platform more towards low-code or no-code.""There needs to be better documentation for IBM BPM in a central place. There is not any standard documentation for each component available and has been a barrier for developers.""They don't have a mechanism to achieve processes, data sources, and data.""The interface is limited and should improve in the future.""Some of the features are not enough for my business. We need to build custom user management for the many end users affected by BPM.""It is not user-friendly."

More IBM BPM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The price could be better. It's quite expensive."
  • More AuraQuantic Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Its price is on the higher side, and it can be improved. Its licensing is on a yearly basis. There are no additional costs."
  • "IBM could improve the price. It is far too expensive."
  • "I wish it was less expensive. I don't know why their pricing model is so high for a piece of software that could benefit so many. It just seems to me that they could have a lower cost, maybe with fewer features or whatever, but it should be possible to do a lower cost workflow software that uses the same interface and underlying engine but does not cost so much that you have to be a Fortune 50 company to buy it. It is annoying to me. There are a lot of solutions that IBM has that are really powerful but nobody can afford them. They know their business, but I still feel that there are a lot of customers who would benefit from this sort of thing. I don't know what this elitism is all about. I am sure they have people doing the money numbers, but it seems like you can make a lot more money by selling it to way more people for a little bit less."
  • "When considering the features of the solution the price is expensive compared to competitors."
  • "It's expensive. All software is always extremely high. The manufacturing cost that we have compared to the selling cost, it's not like you're building a house or building a car. But putting that aside, considering that it's expensive, it's a lot of money. If you compare it with some of the other alternatives in the market, it's a similar price. For instance, if you compare it with Pegasystems, it's a similar price."
  • "The price of the solution is fair for an enterprise solution that has both cloud and on-premise deployments and when comparing to competitors. Recently IBM has introduced Cloud Pak which allows for more flexible licensing options for automation and other features."
  • "Licensing is managed by the client, but we know it is yearly. Camunda is relatively cheaper. There is not much difference in pricing of IBM and PEGA. For large licensing, there are discounts as well."
  • "I already compared some solutions related to business process management, and I saw that the cost of IBM BPM is more expensive compared with that of Camunda, for example."
  • More IBM BPM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    632,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible.
    Top Answer:The price could be better. It's quite expensive. More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help. I haven't seen these… more »
    Top Answer:We researched both IBM solutions and in the end, we chose Business Automation Workflow. IBM BPM has a good user interface and the BPM coach is a helpful tool. The API is very useful in providing… more »
    Top Answer:The solution has helped us automate business processes.
    Top Answer:In terms of licensing, we have to make it free for the developers so more people can install and use it. It is important to make at least licensing free to try in the cloud, not just for IBM BPM but… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    985
    Comparisons
    753
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    693
    Rating
    7.0
    Views
    14,647
    Comparisons
    11,729
    Reviews
    28
    Average Words per Review
    503
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    WebSphere Lombardi Edition, IBM Business Process Manager, IBM WebSphere Process Server
    Learn More
    Overview

    AuraQuantic is a digital platform designed for business users to easily and rapidly build unlimited processes and applications to automate end-to-end operations, reducing costs and optimizing productivity.

    AuraQuantic is a no-code platform for building the enterprise solutions that drive Digital Transformation.

    Interface

    Delight users with attractive interfaces across multiple devices and deliver the best user experience. Respond immediately to their ever-changing needs with the agility provided by the platform and its no-code changes on the fly.

    Logic

    This is the most powerful part of any application. This is why AuraQuantic offers a long list of built-in, no-code functionalities.

    Data

    To manage application and process data models, AuraQuantic provides a visual data model designer and supports importing data schemas.

    Application Governance

    Access rights management (to apps and app development)Application metadata collection, Application performance monitoring, Application works dashboard, Custom ‘guardrails’ for practitioners/developersRole-based access control to data and services for app dev, Multiple practitioners/developers for a single app and across the platform.


    Business Analytics

    Digital Decisioning features aim to inform and automate operational decisions. These decisions continue to increase in amount and complexity due to growing customer demands. Business decision automation is a must to keep up with ever-changing customer needs.

    Thanks to business activity data collection, using custom applications built with AuraQuantic, the organization is empowered to carry out accurate analysis and act smart by leveraging business insights.

    Connectivity

    API REST, API SOAP, API DLL
    Exposing APIs (process/application logic and decision systems)
    Connector builder
    REST and SOAP web services connector
    External database connectors (Adapters Servers, scripts and stored procedures execution)
    .Net Assembly connector Connectors with Artificial Intelligence services (AI)
    Robotic Process Automation (RPA) service connectors
    More built-in connectors (50+)
    Microsoft Office 365, Google Suite, SAP…

    IBM Business Process Manager is a comprehensive BPM platform giving you visibility and insight to manage business processes. It scales smoothly and easily from an initial project to a full enterprise-wide program harnesses complexity in a simple environment to better meet customer needs.
    Offer
    Learn more about AuraQuantic
    Learn more about IBM BPM
    Sample Customers
    Nissan, RSA Chile, New Millennia Group Plc (UK), TOYOTA, ArcelorMittal Brasil, KPN, Farmacia Luis Corbi, Farmacia del Paseo, Frutas Bean, IncAE Business School, BDO Argentina, Refinery of the Pacific, Balfego Grup, Fundacion Seneca, Technological Institute Maranosa, Coprusa Group, Constructec, University of Deusto, Tenco Shopping Centers, Spanish Railways Foundation, Arbora & Ausonia.
    Barclays, EmeriCon, Banca Popolare di Milano, CST Consulting, KeyBank, KPMG, Prolifics, Sandhata Technologies Ltd., State of Alaska, Humana S.A., Saperion, esciris, Banco Espirito Santo
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Government9%
    Insurance Company8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm56%
    Insurance Company14%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm23%
    Computer Software Company20%
    Comms Service Provider12%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business100%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business31%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise54%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise72%
    Buyer's Guide
    AuraQuantic vs. IBM BPM
    September 2022
    Find out what your peers are saying about AuraQuantic vs. IBM BPM and other solutions. Updated: September 2022.
    632,779 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AuraQuantic is ranked 30th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 27 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 7.0, while IBM BPM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Helps organizations improve their work processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "A very stable and powerful tool for handling lots of concurrent users, but it is expensive, and the Eclipse-based tool has performance issues when you have a lot of developers". AuraQuantic is most compared with Pega BPM, Camunda Platform, Appian, Bizagi and Bonita, whereas IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda Platform, IBM Business Automation Workflow, Pega BPM, Appian and Apache Airflow. See our AuraQuantic vs. IBM BPM report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.