Atlan vs Securiti comparison

Atlan and Securiti are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Atlan is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.1, while Securiti is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.3. Atlan holds a 2.1% mindshare in DG, compared to Securiti’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Atlan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Securiti users who would recommend it.

Atlan

Read 8 Atlan reviews

1,456 Views
1,427 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Securiti

Read 9 Securiti reviews

1,834 Views
1,100 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Atlan

Securiti

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Atlan and Securiti based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Atlan vs. Securiti Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Atlan vs. Securiti

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 880,844 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atlan

Ranking in Data Governance

12th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Metadata Management (5th)

Securiti

Ranking in Data Governance

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (12th), Data Privacy Management Software (1st), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (10th), Data Detection & Response (DDR) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Atlan is 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securiti is 2.0%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Atlan	2.1%
Securiti	2.0%
Other	95.9%

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Peter Neumann

IT consultant at Pathfinder

Has struggled to meet business needs but supports technical data exploration and transparency

Atlan can be improved by concentrating more on business data since it is developed from developers for developers, and it needs to be more business relevant. For instance, when re-importing data model diagrams, Atlan provides some diagram automation that is not connected to the business glossary, which I consider a significant fault. Atlan needs to improve by focusing more on the business side of data, not only on technical aspects.If you want to focus on technical considerations, it would be beneficial to have an interface with a real business data modeling tool such as Erwin or other business data tools, since data modeling is not the same as Draw.io. Additionally, Atlan can improve its workflows, which are hard to understand. Working with templates, Excel import, export, and running automations is not self-explanatory, and you always need help from Atlan support team. If business people want to use it and run their own reports, it must be easier to customize for their business needs.

Read full review

reviewer2765175

Chief Manager IT at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Have built a zero trust foundation that protects customer data and reduces business risk

To improve Securiti, I would say that ultimately the IT team as well as the business team, there has to be an amalgamation of their thought process, convergence of their thoughts, objectives, aspirations for achieving the business objective of a particular organization. The way forward is to form the fusion team wherein there is a judicious mix of business and IT and both the teams understand each other's limitations and the aspirations and the common objectives. As far as needed improvements in Securiti, I would say that automation is key. If you look at the kind of huge amount of data which SOC integrated devices are generating in terms of alerts, automation or the appropriate use of AI is the way forward. That will lead to the overall improvement in the efficiency as well as the threat intelligence will be much more accurate. To my mind, automation with the augmented use of GenAI or the agentic AI solution is the way forward. I choose eight for Securiti because for it to be a nine or 10, ultimately the uptime has to be improved, it should be nearing 100%. Apart from that, there has to be more unified communication happening between various customer facing applications. These siloed applications having their own kind of security solutions implemented also have to be brought on a uniform platform. Until that happens, there is always a gap which has to be filled. The processes within the SOC, whether it is SIEM, NBAD, or your DAM, alert analysis, logs analysis, these have to be predictive analysis, and the thwarting of the cyber attacks still requires more effort.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The interfaces and automated imports have helped me with transparency, as we have different sources from different techniques such as DBT, Snowflake, and other regular databases, making it effective to connect these sources and navigate through them, filter them, and enrich the data with additional meter information."

"Overall, I rate Atlan as a ten out of ten."

"Atlan is helpful for identifying datasets and discovering PI data, such as the classification levels of datasets (gold, silver, bronze)."

"Overall, I rate Atlan a nine out of ten."

"The technical support services are good."

"They also offer automated lineage embedded in the connectors, allowing us to track where the data is coming from and where it's going. We find it very efficient in cataloging data sources. Additionally, the user-friendly interface is a big plus, making it easy for users to familiarize themselves with the solution. These two features, in my opinion, stand out the most."

"Atlas is quite intuitive."

"The AI part is integrated for enriching metadata engagement, making it a comprehensive tool."

More Atlan pros

"Their data discovery is a fantastic product."

"Data discovery is a fantastic product."

"It's very scalable. I would rate it ten out of ten for scalability."

"The quality of the learning that Securiti offers, especially considering that the courses are free, is incredible."

"The process mapping is a good tool. We have a nice view of their data."

"With that kind of high availability and the continuous threat exposure management, CTEM, we are quite sure and we have proved our worth to the business in implementing the cyber security solutions."

"The initial setup is easy."

"I would recommend Securiti to others with challenges like obtaining human resources for timely classification."

More Securiti pros

Cons

"The product could be improved by offering scheduled email reports for managed assets."

"Working with templates, Excel import, export, and running automations is not self-explanatory, and you always need help from Atlan support team."

"The challenge is in the lineage, where it requires improvement. Atlas needs to capture areas where organizations use less known applications."

"There are some improvements. There is a feature called Playbooks, which basically allows me to automate certain activities that would otherwise be manual. It's a very interesting feature, but there is room to improve it because, depending on the task you automate, the playbooks seem to have a hard time handling the task. So, it could be improved there. Even though it's a great feature, it can evolve further."

"Certain UI changes could make Atlan more user-friendly."

"One area that could be improved is the capability to find duplicates of datasets."

"One of the main areas for improvement is its governance capabilities. Atlan supports only basic out-of-the-box workflows, and it becomes challenging to customize features like how data owners should approve access to data assets."

"One area that could be improved is the capability to find duplicates of datasets."

More Atlan cons

"It's not very fast, and it's difficult to get an answer."

"One limitation of Securiti is that it can only classify about 30% to 40% of my data."

"The scalability of Securiti is not high because we have to customize the solution. It is very complicated to scale, so it needs improvement."

"Technical support needs enhancement. It would be helpful to have better documentation and more accessible support, especially when raising support tickets."

"Technical support can be hit or miss. Some technical staff are great, but others are not very effective. On average, I would rate the technical support four out of ten."

"I choose eight for Securiti because for it to be a nine or 10, ultimately the uptime has to be improved, it should be nearing 100%."

"With the formation and education, specifically the security education, they could update the educational video more often."

"I would like their workflows and assessment automation to be more advanced compared to their competitors, especially under the pro core privacy module."

More Securiti cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay per-user license. It's a different classification model than with other solutions, where they usually charge you for resources. So, that was a better model for us. And because of this difference in models or classification, it was cheaper for us to go with Atlan."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlan?

Atlas is competitively priced compared to other data governance platforms like Collibra and Informatica. The only major drawback is its lack of an integrated data quality module.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atlan?

Atlan can be improved by integrating agents that can support users in finding assets of interest.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atlan?

Atlan is used as a data catalog and a data governance tool. The primary idea for implementing Atlan for data cataloging in day-to-day work was to create a business data catalog to support asset dis...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Securiti?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was great because it was all completely free.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Securiti?

There is nothing about Securiti's learning packages or the platform that I would change or improve.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Securiti?

My main use case for Securiti is their learning packages for training. I have used Securiti's learning packages to upskill myself on data governance relating to AI.

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Atlan

Compared 39% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Atlan

Compared 16% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Atlan

Compared 12% of the time

Collibra Platform vs Atlan

Compared 10% of the time

illumex vs Atlan

Compared 3% of the time

More Atlan Competitors

BigID Next vs Securiti

Compared 23% of the time

OneTrust Privacy vs Securiti

Compared 13% of the time

Cyera vs Securiti

Compared 11% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Securiti

Compared 11% of the time

Wiz vs Securiti

Compared 7% of the time

More Securiti Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atlan

January 2026

Download Atlan product report

Buyer's Guide

Securiti

December 2025

Download Securiti product report

Overview

Atlan is a comprehensive data management platform designed to enhance data democratization, governance, and collaboration across departments in organizations. It offers a centralized data catalog, intuitive user interface, and robust governance framework to ensure data security and compliance. Users appreciate its efficiency in streamlining processes, promoting better communication, and providing insightful analytics, which drive organizational growth and success.

Atlan

Securiti is the pioneer of the Data Command Center, a centralized platform that enables the safe use of data and GenAI. It provides unified data intelligence, controls and orchestration across hybrid multicloud environments. Large global enterprises rely on Securiti's Data Command Center for data security, privacy, governance, and compliance.

Securiti has been recognized with numerous industry and analyst awards, including "Most Innovative Startup" by RSA, "Top 25 Machine Learning Startups" by Forbes, "Most Innovative AI Companies" by CB Insights, "Cool Vendor in Data Security" by Gartner, and "Privacy Management Wave Leader" by Forrester.

For more information, please visit Securiti.ai and follow us on LinkedIn and Twitter.

Free Report: Atlan vs. Securiti

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlan vs. Securiti and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

880,844 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atlan vs. Securiti report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.