Atlan vs Securiti comparison

Atlan and Securiti are both solutions in the Data Governance category. Atlan is ranked #12 with an average rating of 8.3, while Securiti is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.1. Atlan holds a 1.8% mindshare in DG, compared to Securiti’s 2.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Atlan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Securiti users who would recommend it.

Atlan

Read 10 Atlan reviews

2,884 Views
2,769 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Securiti

Read 10 Securiti reviews

4,322 Views
2,420 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Atlan

Securiti

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Atlan and Securiti based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Data Governance solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Atlan vs. Securiti Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Atlan vs. Securiti

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,877 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atlan

Ranking in Data Governance

12th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Metadata Management (5th)

Securiti

Ranking in Data Governance

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (16th), Data Privacy Management Software (2nd), Data Security Posture Management (DSPM) (12th), Data Detection & Response (DDR) (1st), Data Security Platforms (DSP) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Data Governance category, the mindshare of Atlan is 1.8%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Securiti is 2.0%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Governance Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Atlan	1.8%
Securiti	2.0%
Other	96.2%

Data Governance

Featured Reviews

Peter Neumann

IT consultant at Pathfinder

Has struggled to meet business needs but supports technical data exploration and transparency

Atlan can be improved by concentrating more on business data since it is developed from developers for developers, and it needs to be more business relevant. For instance, when re-importing data model diagrams, Atlan provides some diagram automation that is not connected to the business glossary, which I consider a significant fault. Atlan needs to improve by focusing more on the business side of data, not only on technical aspects.If you want to focus on technical considerations, it would be beneficial to have an interface with a real business data modeling tool such as Erwin or other business data tools, since data modeling is not the same as Draw.io. Additionally, Atlan can improve its workflows, which are hard to understand. Working with templates, Excel import, export, and running automations is not self-explanatory, and you always need help from Atlan support team. If business people want to use it and run their own reports, it must be easier to customize for their business needs.

Read full review

reviewer2765175

Chief Manager (Information Technology) at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Have built a zero trust foundation that protects customer data and reduces business risk

To improve Securiti, I would say that ultimately the IT team as well as the business team, there has to be an amalgamation of their thought process, convergence of their thoughts, objectives, aspirations for achieving the business objective of a particular organization. The way forward is to form the fusion team wherein there is a judicious mix of business and IT and both the teams understand each other's limitations and the aspirations and the common objectives. As far as needed improvements in Securiti, I would say that automation is key. If you look at the kind of huge amount of data which SOC integrated devices are generating in terms of alerts, automation or the appropriate use of AI is the way forward. That will lead to the overall improvement in the efficiency as well as the threat intelligence will be much more accurate. To my mind, automation with the augmented use of GenAI or the agentic AI solution is the way forward. I choose eight for Securiti because for it to be a nine or 10, ultimately the uptime has to be improved, it should be nearing 100%. Apart from that, there has to be more unified communication happening between various customer facing applications. These siloed applications having their own kind of security solutions implemented also have to be brought on a uniform platform. Until that happens, there is always a gap which has to be filled. The processes within the SOC, whether it is SIEM, NBAD, or your DAM, alert analysis, logs analysis, these have to be predictive analysis, and the thwarting of the cyber attacks still requires more effort.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, I rate Atlan as a ten out of ten."

"By switching to Atlan, we have increased our productivity and saved a lot of business time through automation."

"The AI part is integrated for enriching metadata engagement, making it a comprehensive tool."

"They also offer automated lineage embedded in the connectors, allowing us to track where the data is coming from and where it's going. We find it very efficient in cataloging data sources. Additionally, the user-friendly interface is a big plus, making it easy for users to familiarize themselves with the solution. These two features, in my opinion, stand out the most."

"The best feature of Atlan is its integration with communication platforms like Microsoft Teams and Slack, so business users don't have to go into a data catalog to see metadata about data assets."

"As a senior analytics engineer, Atlan's ability to show end-to-end data lineage is the most important feature for me."

"The technical support services are good."

"By switching to Atlan, we have increased our productivity and saved a lot of business time."

More Atlan pros

"The quality of the learning that Securiti offers, especially considering that the courses are free, is incredible."

"Overall, I would rate Securiti a nine out of ten."

"The drag-and-drop features make Securiti easy to use, even for individuals who are not tech-savvy."

"I would recommend Securiti to others with challenges like obtaining human resources for timely classification."

"The automated way of identifying and classifying personal information is very beneficial."

"It's very scalable. I would rate it ten out of ten for scalability."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The best features Securiti offers include that the data discovery was really good, it was easy to set up, and the view was a differential compared with other solutions, so we could see in a map where our data were located and investigate better who was using that data, who was responsible for that data and secure who had access to it."

More Securiti pros

Cons

"One of the main areas for improvement is its governance capabilities."

"Customer support for Atlan is not so proactive."

"One area that could be improved is the capability to find duplicates of datasets."

"One of the main areas for improvement is its governance capabilities. Atlan supports only basic out-of-the-box workflows, and it becomes challenging to customize features like how data owners should approve access to data assets."

"Working with templates, Excel import, export, and running automations is not self-explanatory, and you always need help from Atlan support team."

"The product could be improved by offering scheduled email reports for managed assets."

"There are some improvements. There is a feature called Playbooks, which basically allows me to automate certain activities that would otherwise be manual. It's a very interesting feature, but there is room to improve it because, depending on the task you automate, the playbooks seem to have a hard time handling the task. So, it could be improved there. Even though it's a great feature, it can evolve further."

"Atlan can be improved by integrating agents that can support users in finding assets of interest."

More Atlan cons

"One limitation of Securiti is that it can only classify about 30% to 40% of my data."

"I could see that in an environment where we had a lot of information, sometimes it was a little slow with Securiti, so I believe they could improve by making the solution faster in big environments."

"The scalability of Securiti is not high because we have to customize the solution. It is very complicated to scale, so it needs improvement."

"I choose eight for Securiti because for it to be a nine or 10, ultimately the uptime has to be improved, it should be nearing 100%."

"It's not very fast, and it's difficult to get an answer."

"While the software is functionally robust and intuitive, there is a challenging learning curve."

"Technical support needs enhancement. It would be helpful to have better documentation and more accessible support, especially when raising support tickets."

"Technical support can be hit or miss. Some technical staff are great, but others are not very effective. On average, I would rate the technical support four out of ten."

More Securiti cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay per-user license. It's a different classification model than with other solutions, where they usually charge you for resources. So, that was a better model for us. And because of this difference in models or classification, it was cheaper for us to go with Atlan."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Governance solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	7

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atlan?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the licensing cost is a bit flexible but not affordable for smaller organizations. It might be way out of their budget, but it is very ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atlan?

Atlan can be improved by enhancing their support process by reducing the resolution time. They have really bad and incomplete documentation, so they should work on the documentation as well, especi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atlan?

My main use case for Atlan is to define a flexible set of metadata, including measuring the quality of said data. Atlan is also a partner of ours, so we use it to integrate with our own tool. It al...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Securiti?

Regarding my experience with pricing, setup cost, or licensing, I did not have much experience because I was more a technical user, but I believe it was not really expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Securiti?

I could see that in an environment where we had a lot of information, sometimes it was a little slow with Securiti, so I believe they could improve by making the solution faster in big environments...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Securiti?

My main use case for Securiti is that we implemented it to improve our data privacy and compliance operations across multiple business units. A specific example of how I used Securiti for privacy o...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Purview Data Governance vs Atlan

Compared 15% of the time

Alation Data Catalog vs Atlan

Compared 13% of the time

Collibra Platform vs Atlan

Compared 13% of the time

Dawiso vs Atlan

Compared 10% of the time

More Atlan Competitors

BigID Next vs Securiti

Compared 16% of the time

Varonis Platform vs Securiti

Compared 10% of the time

OneTrust Privacy vs Securiti

Compared 10% of the time

OneTrust DataGovernance vs Securiti

Compared 6% of the time

Cyera vs Securiti

Compared 5% of the time

More Securiti Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atlan

August 2026

Download Atlan product report

Buyer's Guide

Securiti

July 2026

Download Securiti product report

Overview

Atlan is a comprehensive data management platform designed to enhance data democratization, governance, and collaboration across departments in organizations. It offers a centralized data catalog, intuitive user interface, and robust governance framework to ensure data security and compliance. Users appreciate its efficiency in streamlining processes, promoting better communication, and providing insightful analytics, which drive organizational growth and success.

Atlan

Securiti provides advanced solutions for automating data privacy tasks with ease, supporting organizations in achieving compliance with global regulations while enhancing operational resilience and data protection.

Securiti enhances data privacy management through its powerful automation tools. Its drag-and-drop functionality simplifies tasks, enabling efficient personal information classification and sensitive data intelligence. With features like consent management, zero trust architecture, and data lineage visualization, Securiti supports compliance with international regulations, improving data protection and ensuring business continuity. While it needs refinement in areas like technical support and data classification accuracy, its robust AI data governance package remains a major asset for businesses.

What are Securiti's Key Features?

Drag-and-Drop Functionality: Simplifies automation of privacy tasks.
Automated Classification: Enhances personal data management.
Consent Management: Facilitates GDPR compliance.
Zero Trust Architecture: Strengthens data security.
Data Lineage Visualization: Offers insights into data flows.
AI Data Governance: Comprehensive tools for data governance.

What Benefits Can Users Expect?

Regulatory Compliance: Streamlines adherence to global privacy laws.
Operational Resilience: Automates tasks for consistent performance.
Data Protection: Employs advanced techniques for safeguarding information.
Business Continuity: Ensures uninterrupted operations through intelligent data handling.

In banking, Securiti aids in customer-facing applications for data protection, integrating with systems like Salesforce to manage consent. It ensures compliance with GDPR and the Australian Privacy Act, supporting industries in maintaining privacy standards. Securiti's learning packages also enhance skills in data governance and AI, proving valuable across sectors.

Free Report: Atlan vs. Securiti

Find out what your peers are saying about Atlan vs. Securiti and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,877 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atlan vs. Securiti report.

See our list of best Data Governance vendors.

We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.