Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Atalla Hardware Security Module vs Symantec Advanced Authentication comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Atalla Hardware Security Mo...
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Payment HSM (2nd)
Symantec Advanced Authentic...
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
8.7
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Authentication Systems (24th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Atalla Hardware Security Module and Symantec Advanced Authentication aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Atalla Hardware Security Module is designed for Payment HSM and holds a mindshare of 29.1%, up 22.0% compared to last year.
Symantec Advanced Authentication, on the other hand, focuses on Authentication Systems, holds 1.4% mindshare, up 0.5% since last year.
Payment HSM Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Atalla Hardware Security Module29.1%
Thales payShield36.1%
Futurex Hardware Security Modules (HSM)16.7%
Other18.099999999999994%
Payment HSM
Authentication Systems Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Symantec Advanced Authentication1.4%
Microsoft Entra ID7.8%
Cisco Duo5.0%
Other85.8%
Authentication Systems
 

Featured Reviews

Use Atalla Hardware Security Module?
Leave a review
Umair (Abu Mohaymin) Akhlaque - PeerSpot reviewer
Group CEO at Flexsolutions
Ensures robust security features and ease of deployment, although it may lack some of the more modern authentication options
There has been a need for aggressive development to modernize the product and align it with contemporary security requirements. While the rebranding has been a step forward, further enhancements are essential to meet the evolving demands of the market. It lacks features such as ActiveSync Exchange security, and it doesn't offer alternatives like password-less authentication via biometrics or patches. While Symantec mainly relies on traditional token-based or password-based methods, newer authentication methods are missing from its repertoire. Support services often lack promptness and depth of knowledge, leaving customers waiting for weeks to resolve issues. In the realm of multifactor authentication, swift resolution of problems is critical, as any slowdown or interruption can significantly impact operations. Urgent improvement is necessary to ensure that support responses are faster and more effective, aligning with the demands of MFA implementation.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Payment HSM solutions are best for your needs.
881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
19%
Performing Arts
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Large Enterprise7
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Symantec Advanced Authentication?
One of the most valuable aspects is its remarkable stability.
What needs improvement with Symantec Advanced Authentication?
There has been a need for aggressive development to modernize the product and align it with contemporary security requirements. While the rebranding has been a step forward, further enhancements ar...
 

Also Known As

Utimaco Atalla Hardware Security Module, Micro Focus Atalla Hardware Security Module, HPE Atalla HSM
CA Advanced Authentication, CA Strong Authentication, CA Risk Authentication, Arcot WebFort, Arcot RiskFort
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Top U.S. Banks and Retail organizations have used Atalla for 30+ years.
Global bank, Large Filipino Bank and SK Infosec