We performed a comparison between AstrillVPN and Fortinet FortiClient based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Fortinet, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"I find it very convenient to connect."
"The product's initial setup phase is easy."
"Installation was easy."
"The solution's TNA feature blocks devices from entering the network that do not meet compliance protocols."
"The most valuable feature is the single pane of glass, single point of management."
"It has a very easy-to-use interface. It has ease of management, and all the modules are there. SKUs are also easily identifiable. Whatever is required in the firewall is already there in it. It's very advanced, and analytics reporting is very good. They also have cloud reporting. You get all the services that are available for your device in the cloud. You just have to subscribe. It's very easy. There's a lot of demand for this solution because it's an all-in-one solution. The throughput is very high."
"The solution offers great stability."
"I think the solution is highly scalable."
"The integration of VPN services with endpoint security is valuable."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"I would rate the scalability a three out of ten."
"I don't think FortiClient is bad, but it's very buggy. We ran into some issues with the EMS, which amounted to more than 10 cases last year."
"Compatibility issues between different versions."
"While we like patch management, it would be nice if it could handle patch management for other solutions, like Microsoft."
"There isn't much to improve in terms of features and comparison with other vendors. It just needs to stay more up to date in catching the malware. The user interface may be improved, which would be a minor enhancement. Unlike central management, in endpoint security, the end users don't need to keep looking at the endpoint user interface. The technology is the most important thing in endpoint security."
"The connectivity could be improved."
"The solution's access control could be improved."
"An area of improvement could be better integration with the active directory. I did not find it easy to configure."
"Working with Distribution sometimes comes at a cost due to a lack of knowledge of the current status of your licensing and products."
AstrillVPN is ranked 30th in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 1 review while Fortinet FortiClient is ranked 2nd in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN with 85 reviews. AstrillVPN is rated 8.0, while Fortinet FortiClient is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AstrillVPN writes "Bypasses internet restrictions and makes it easy to access content that may be restricted". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiClient writes "Easy to set up and user-friendly with good support ". AstrillVPN is most compared with , whereas Fortinet FortiClient is most compared with OpenVPN Access Server, Fortinet FortiEDR, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business.
See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
