Aruba Instant On Access Points and Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points are competing products in the wireless networking sector. Based on feature comparisons, Juniper Mist has an edge due to its advanced AI capabilities and comprehensive insights.
Features: Aruba Instant On Access Points are known for their ease of management, seamless setup, and aesthetic appeal, making them suitable for small to medium businesses. They offer robust coverage and user-friendly deployment without the need for physical buttons or controllers. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points, on the other hand, are distinguished by AI-driven network management, providing comprehensive insights, advanced troubleshooting, and strong security features along with centralized management and analytics tools.
Room for Improvement: Aruba users have reported desires for better reporting capabilities, increased access point capacity, and improved management features for extensive setups. They also seek enhanced integration with other platforms and devices. Some Juniper Mist users suggest enhancements in pricing, support services, and adaptive features for better integration with other systems. Enhancing AI capabilities and minimizing network interference are also points of concern.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Aruba Instant On Access Points are praised for straightforward deployment and minimal setup time, primarily focusing on on-premises installations with technical support. Customer service experiences vary, with some describing response times as slow. Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points offer diverse deployment options, including public, private, and hybrid clouds, easing integration into various network environments. While some users report satisfactory support, others mention the need for improved responsiveness in complex scenarios.
Pricing and ROI: Aruba Instant On Access Points are perceived as cost-effective, with no ongoing licensing fees and an accessible entry price, which appeals to budget-conscious customers. Conversely, Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points are seen as more expensive due to higher upfront and annual costs attributed to extended feature offerings. While users acknowledge the value these features bring, some suggest it may not suit smaller budgets, impacting ROI perceptions.
The technical support from Aruba is rated seven due to limitations, such as support issues when the controller is on the VM side.
There are still issues with the language barrier and the overall quality of support.
My impression of Juniper support is generally good, and I would rate it probably a 9.
Technical support is very good.
The cloud, which operates on Amazon Web Services (AWS), can support unlimited access points.
It's built for larger environments.
The stability of Aruba Instant On Access Points is generally good.
In future updates, more AI for intelligence and the option for a separate network could be beneficial.
There is not enough focus on security across networking vendors, and they often add features without testing them thoroughly.
The default configuration can be overridden to enhance performance beyond the default settings.
Juniper products are still coming to market, HP offers its own access point range, which competes with Juniper's premium Mist access points intended for enterprise customers.
I suggest that the AI tool in the Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points needs to be a little bit more ChatGPT-like, allowing easier communication in normal language instead of requiring specific prompts.
The reporting logs require improvement in terms of clarity.
The pricing of Aruba Instant On Access Points is competitive compared to Cisco, and they are actually cheaper.
Aruba Instant On Access Points work without a list price, suggesting that they are open source and no additional licensing costs are incurred.
The cost of Aruba Instant On Access Points is reasonable;
Regarding pricing, Juniper's cost rates as a seven on a scale where one represents a high price and ten represents a low price.
Juniper Mist is cheaper than Meraki, placing it in the middle of the pack.
The price is very high, which is why not all enterprises can purchase this product.
Customers choose Aruba because it is more stable, has superior radio management, and offers features like mesh and a stateful firewall.
The product is incredibly stable and meets our needs excellently.
The virtual controller feature is very beneficial because it removes the need for a physical controller.
I have gained valuable insights from the Mist Cloud's analytics and network insights, as it tells you a lot of things, including details about Microsoft Teams calls, identifying which calls were good or bad, and correlating that to the client's signal and which access point the client was connected to at the time.
From my perspective, the Juniper reporting logs are clear and provide necessary data, which supports better management and diagnosis.
It's a cloud solution with Mist, which helps troubleshoot and provides visibility to look at different access points.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Aruba Instant On Access Points | 1.3% |
| Juniper Mist Wireless Access Points | 5.6% |
| Other | 93.1% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 22 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
Ingredients for success.
Fast 802.11ac Wave 2, secure employee and guest access, easy-to-use web, and mobile app management.
Say yes to secure Wi-Fi access.
Pre-built access control lists (ACLs) and built-in firewall in the access points prevent malicious traffic from entering your network – we call it “hassle-free” security.
Never drop an important call.
With Instant On, voice and video business applications are automatically prioritized, so you stay connected with your peers.
Juniper Wireless Access Points work in conjunction with Juniper Mist Cloud Services and Mist AI to deliver premier wireless access capabilities. The Juniper Mist Edge extends microservices to the campus to bring agility and scale while enabling new applications at the edge.
We monitor all Wireless LAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
