Aruba ClearPass vs Fortinet FortiNAC comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 7, 2022
 

Categories and Ranking

Aruba ClearPass
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
76
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Fortinet FortiNAC
Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)
4th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of Aruba ClearPass is 24.3%, down from 24.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiNAC is 20.1%, up from 17.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Network Access Control (NAC)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Aditya Buditama - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 15, 2022
Has an access tracker that's helpful when you want to troubleshoot authentication failures
My company has eight hundred users of Aruba ClearPass in the IT security team, and about five or six people are required for the deployment and maintenance of the solution. Currently, my company doesn't have any plans of increasing usage for Aruba ClearPass because it's been scaled up three times more than the current need when it was first purchased, so the solution is only being used at about 30% of its maximum capacity. It could take another four or five years before my company increases its usage. Aruba ClearPass is a solution I would highly recommend to others looking into implementing it because, in my experience, it's really easy to manage. It has a low production cost, and even if the initial cost for the deployment is quite high, it becomes pretty cheap because you don't have to renew the license. If you need basic captive portal authentication, I would recommend Aruba ClearPass. I'm rating Aruba ClearPass nine out of ten. My company is a customer, not a partner of Aruba ClearPass.
Charity Kimotho - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 21, 2024
Provides great visibility allowing us to manage and control all devices accessing our network
We use Fortinet FortiNAC for visibility and control The Fortinet FortiNAC device visibility feature helps prevent unauthorized devices from being plugged into our network, even if physically brought onto the premises. Fortinet FortiNAC's policy enforcement is a valuable asset in our network…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It is beneficial from a security perspective because not everyone can connect to our wifi without going through an authentication process."
"ClearPass is open to any operating system or mobile app."
"The customized modules for guests, the self-registration and login, one license for all, no license for guest users, and the self-integration of sandbox integration are the most valuable features."
"ClearPass' best features are authentication, support for multiple devices, and monitoring."
"A mature and functional product."
"What I like most about Aruba ClearPass is its access tracker that serves as its monitoring feature. The access tracker is really helpful when you want to troubleshoot authentication failures."
"Gives us network access control, visibility, scalability, security, and control in what is becoming an uncontrollable, inundated BYOD and IoT world."
"It's a great solution with multi-vendor support. That's always useful."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiNAC are user device management and there are plenty of policies."
"Version 9.1 has been an improvement on previous versions. It's a good solution for SMB."
"It effectively addresses issues arising from endpoint connections to the network, contributing to an enhanced overall security solution for our clients."
"The most valuable features are the ease of deployment and ease of use."
"The tool provides us with a list of devices that tries to connect to our network. It offers us a lot of network visibility."
"The device fingerprinting feature allowed for easy creation and enforcement of access policies."
"The ease of deployment is valuable."
"All the features of Fortinet FortiNAC are valuable."
 

Cons

"The implementation can improve because it is challenging to explain some of the concepts to the client."
"The user interface should be improved. The logs and how the logging mechanism works can also use an upgrade."
"TLS authentication onboarding in Aruba ClearPass needs to be improved. The biggest problem we've seen in our environment is Huawei not being able to get onto Google Play. No Huawei device can be onboarded via Aruba ClearPass easily."
"​​The AirWave Dashboard heat maps could be better designed."
"What needs improvement in Aruba ClearPass is just the endpoint context server, in particular, the indication with the context server because sometimes the daily process isn't as smooth-sailing. Sometimes, the information isn't up-to-date. I'm not sure if that's a vendor limitation, but currently, it's the only tricky part of the current configuration. What I'd like to see in the next release of Aruba ClearPass is a dashboard or a monitoring feature that would allow users to see the integration process with an external server because there's no visibility into that right now."
"The solution should be more precise for VMs and allow for management of the entire system."
"The pricing policy could be more flexible."
"Configuration should be more easy to understand between the link of two topics."
"Admin UI could be better matched and easier to use; it cannot work as a RADIUS server."
"Classifications and visibility need to be improved a lot. They have to start work on being agentless. Agentless means they need to have strong integration with Windows."
"The interface works fine, but it could be better."
"Fortinet FortiNAC could improve its hardware for use with cloud-based firewalls."
"Its technical support needs improvement."
"The solution's licensing price should be improved."
"Fortinet FortiNAC's device compatibility could be improved, particularly for VoIP devices."
"The product could be more user-friendly in terms of GUI."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I can say that the package or licensing model offered for the solution is a permanent one."
"Licensing and pricing are extremely straightforward."
"The licensing cost for Aruba ClearPass is a bit expensive. Its pricing could be better. The license costs around $125,000 for the perpetual license and support for one year. Aruba can give you a license with five thousand endpoint access and one thousand five hundred onboard licenses on one hundred endpoints and two controllers."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is too expensive, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten."
"The price of Aruba ClearPass is expensive. However, Cisco ISE was as expensive when we were comparing."
"We pay an annual licensing fee for Aruba and there are no additional costs."
"The pricing is not bad and everything is included."
"In terms of your fixed cost, it is much less than a lot of other solutions in the market. The initial cost is very high."
"I rate Fortinet FortiNAC's pricing an eight out of ten."
"The price is fair and reasonable for our clients."
"The licensing fees are a little bit high."
"The pricing is similar to that of other solutions."
"The product itself is inexpensive, but the licensing is expensive."
"For the projects that we do the Fortinet FortiNAC is affordable."
"It's a pricey solution."
"FortiNAC's price has gone up in the last year. However, compared to other solutions, such as Cisco ISE, it is cheaper."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
6%
Educational Organization
34%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Government
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Aruba Clearpass or Cisco ISE?
Aruba ClearPass is a Network Access Control tool that gives secure network access to multiple device types. You can adapt the policies to VPN access, wired, or wireless access. You can securely ...
What is the biggest difference between Aruba ClearPass and FortiNAC?
I've done quite a lot of work with ClearPass, and not a lot with FortiNAC/Bradford. ClearPass incorporates a number of different functions including ClearPass Guest for creating complex wireless g...
What do you like most about Aruba ClearPass?
If you are looking at the base installation, then it was a very straightforward process, which I would rate an eight or nine out of ten.
How does Cisco ISE compare with Fortinet FortiNAC?
Cisco ISE uses AI endpoint analytics to identify new devices based on their behavior. It will also notify you if someone plugs in with a device that is not allowed and will block it. The user exper...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiNAC?
The support responds to our queries within two to four hours.
 

Also Known As

Avenda eTIPS
FortiNAC, Bradford Networks, Bradford Networks Sentry, Network Sentry Family
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Consulate Health Care, Los Angeles Unified School District, Science Applications International Corp (SAIC), San Diego State University, KFC, ACTS Retirement-Life Communities
Isavia, Pepperdine University, Medical University of South Carolina, Columbia University Medical Center, Utah Valley University
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba ClearPass vs. Fortinet FortiNAC and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.