ArmorCode vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) comparison

ArmorCode vs. Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ArmorCode

Ranking in Application Security Tools

27th

Ranking in DevSecOps

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

2.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Risk-Based Vulnerability Management (15th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (14th)

Check Point WAF (formerly C...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

5th

Ranking in DevSecOps

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (8th), Web Application Firewall (WAF) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of ArmorCode is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)	0.9%
ArmorCode	0.7%
Other	98.4%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Amandeep Pawar

Senior Engineer at Airy Software Technologies Private Limited

Centralized risk-based workflows have reduced alert fatigue and improve on-time secure delivery

ArmorCode is a strong ASPM platform that provides centralized visibility and risk-based prioritization, and there are several areas where it could be enhanced to improve the user experience and increase adoption across development teams. Improvements could include more AI-powered remediation guidance, improved developer experience, enhanced predictive risk analysis, strong cloud-native visibility such as Kubernetes, custom reporting, and dashboards including custom risk scorecards, team-specific dashboards, and faster onboarding and setup of new security tools. Improvements could also include pre-built integration, automation, automated connector setup, guided onboarding, and better risk connection that assesses criticality, business impact, data sensitivity, and internet exposure. The most important improvements needed are strong cloud-native visibility, enhanced predictive risk analysis, adding AI-powered remediation guidance, and an improved developer experience. Predictive risk analysis is one area that needs enhancement. While ArmorCode is already excellent at centralizing security findings and prioritizing risk, these improvements could further reduce remediation time and make the platform even more valuable for both security and development teams. Enhancing AI-powered remediation guidance would improve developer experience. For AI-powered remediation guidance, instead of only identifying vulnerabilities, ArmorCode could provide detailed fix recommendations, secure code examples, root cause analysis, and automated remediation suggestions.

Read full review

Krishnakumar Mahadevan

CISO at Spink Solutions Private Limited

Cloud security has strengthened risk posture and improved advanced threat visibility

There are some API gateway and API securities I mentioned. If these are incorporated with AI-related features, particularly those seven key vulnerabilities I mentioned—token theft and tool poisoning—that would be beneficial. AI-related features are not included yet in Check Point CloudGuard WAF. However, they are present in FortiGate. That is the advantage of FortiGate now. FortiGate is stopping all AI-related vulnerabilities now. FortiGate has this capability. It is unfortunate that even Palo Alto also lacks one or two of these features. Check Point Quantum is very good, without a doubt. However, their capabilities are not in comparison with Palo Alto. There are some features, but there are some gaps in comparison with Palo Alto.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The positive impact of ArmorCode on our organization includes improved vulnerability prioritization and better collaboration between security and development teams, as instead of discussing thousands of findings, we focus on critical risks, significantly reducing unnecessary effort and allowing the team to quickly identify high-risk vulnerabilities and assign remediation to application owners."

"ArmorCode is very effective software that reduces human effort and saves time, has a huge impact on the company's revenue and profit, and we deliver everything on time to the client because of ArmorCode."

"The communication between the on-premises device and the cloud for analysis and feedback is a valuable feature."

"We have a strong sense of security assurance when utilizing CloudGuard, as it consistently delivers outstanding protection capabilities."

"I have thousands of exposed websites and APIs. Being able to control what is happening and try to prevent any attack is the best feature."

"By using a cloud application security solution, our company can save costs by reducing the need for additional security hardware and software and improving operational efficiency."

"Its fastest and most outstanding characteristic is ensuring a development line that will not lead to applying applications or code development."

"Among its most outstanding features is the powerful AI in container security; above all, it is one of the most powerful and easy-to-manage solutions."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF has been especially helpful here, automatically learning and adjusting protection without requiring constant manual tuning."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF has improved our organization by providing protection against web application attacks such as SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and bot threats."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pros

Cons

"Improvements could include more AI-powered remediation guidance, improved developer experience, enhanced predictive risk analysis, strong cloud-native visibility such as Kubernetes, custom reporting, and dashboards including custom risk scorecards, team-specific dashboards, and faster onboarding and setup of new security tools."

"I would like to see more AI-driven remediation recommendations, deeper contextual risk analysis, and additional workflow automation for the enterprise environment."

"I face issues with the UI part of Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), as it malfunctions sometimes."

"CloudGuard WAF could improve UI simplicity, reduce false positives, and enhance policy management."

"Multi-tenancy is an area where Check Point has room for improvement."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF's support is only available in English."

"The UI interface needs improvement because there are a number of bugs. Integration with the SIEM platform is currently one of the key challenges that need to be addressed."

"For Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF), the negative aspects include the very high price, complex licensing, and the need for specialized trained people to configure it, which is comparatively more complicated than other firewalls like Palo Alto and FortiGate."

"The creation of security profiles for each application takes a lot of time."

"Some challenges with Check Point CloudGuard Code Security include that we noticed FortiGate is much more efficient on AWS, and our team prefers to deploy FortiGate there instead of CloudGuard due to the management challenges on the cloud."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"Considering all the benefits we've observed, we find the price to be satisfactory."

"Check Point CloudGuard Application Security's pricing is comparable to other products in the market."

"The pricing is competitive compared to other solutions on the market. So, the licensing cost is average."

"If the pricing for the Infinity platform covers everything, it would be more straightforward. I had a hard time selling it to our CEO as a former CFO because of the differentials. There are different deltas year to year over a five-year period. It is very difficult to explain. It would be easier to digest for our executives if there was a flatter scale"

"I find the pricing to be reasonable."

"The tool's licensing costs are yearly and competitive."

"As Infiniti customers, the pricing is manageable, as we have allowances dedicated to each Check Point product. The price is not as high compared to other options I have dealt with in the past."

"Check Point CloudGuard WAF is expensive compared to Azure WAF."

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	54
Midsize Enterprise	23
Large Enterprise	34

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ArmorCode?

I would like to see more AI-driven remediation recommendations, deeper contextual risk analysis, and additional workflow automation for the enterprise environment. I wish ArmorCode could offer more...

What is your primary use case for ArmorCode?

I started using ArmorCode in 2024 as part of our application security and exposure management program, with the objective to consolidate the security findings from multiple security tools into a si...

What advice do you have for others considering ArmorCode?

My advice for others looking into using ArmorCode is to take your time. I recommend integrating as many security tools as possible into ArmorCode, as the platform delivers the most value when it fu...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudGuard for Application Security?

It is a little bit expensive, but the pricing model is acceptable, though a reduction would make it more competitive with leaders such as Palo Alto.

What needs improvement with CloudGuard for Application Security?

The false positive rate is a concern, but I could recommend improvements where false positives have to be minimized better. This all depends on how the rules are customized and configured, and it c...

What is your primary use case for CloudGuard for Application Security?

The main purpose is to have network security through machine learning, which can offer threat detection and intelligence for my endpoints, and I am looking for application security. I am looking fo...

Nucleus Security vs ArmorCode

Comparisons

Snyk vs ArmorCode

Compared 16% of the time

DefectDojo vs ArmorCode

Compared 13% of the time

Compared 9% of the time

Cycode vs ArmorCode

Compared 8% of the time

Wiz Code vs ArmorCode

Compared 7% of the time

More ArmorCode Competitors

OpenText Dynamic Application Security Testing vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 7% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 7% of the time

AWS WAF vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Cloudflare Web Application Firewall vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks vs Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Compared 6% of the time

More Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) Competitors

Product Reports

Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)

Download ArmorCode product report

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)

Download Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) product report

Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF) report

Also Known As

ArmorCode AppSecOps Platform

Check Point CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard Application Security, CloudGuard AppSec, Check Point CloudGuard Code Security

Overview

ArmorCode provides security teams with an efficient platform to manage, assess, and automate application security processes, offering improved incident response and vulnerability management.

With ArmorCode, users gain a centralized platform that enhances security workflows through automation and improved collaboration. It enables seamless integration with existing tools and fosters a proactive security posture. Organizations can streamline their application security processes, ensuring a comprehensive approach to risk management.

What makes ArmorCode valuable?

Automation: Streamlines workflows by automating routine security tasks.
Vulnerability Management: Efficiently assesses and prioritizes vulnerabilities.
Integration: Works seamlessly with existing security and development tools.
Collaboration: Facilitates communication within security and development teams.

What ROI benefits should users expect?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces manual work, saving time and resources.
Improved Security Posture: Provides a proactive defense against threats.
Time Management: Accelerates vulnerability detection and response.
Scalability: Adapts as security needs grow.

ArmorCode is implemented across industries like finance and healthcare, providing tailored security solutions that meet regulatory and compliance requirements. Its adaptability ensures that each industry can leverage best practices in application security management.

ArmorCode Inc.

Check Point WAF offers a robust security framework with AI-driven threat detection and seamless integration, protecting applications and APIs in multi-cloud environments.

Effective in preemptively blocking threats through AI and machine learning, Check Point WAF reduces false positives and operational workload. Its integration capabilities and threat intelligence provide comprehensive protection against zero-day attacks, while centralized management facilitates cost-effective and insightful threat reporting.

What are the main features of Check Point WAF?

AI and Machine Learning: Preemptively blocks threats without signature reliance.
Centralized Management: Simplifies oversight and reduces costs.
Threat Intelligence: Enhances security posture against zero-day attacks.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup with user-friendly interface.
Comprehensive Protection: Guards against SQL injection and DDoS attacks.

What benefits should be considered by users?

Reduced False Positives: Minimizes operational interruptions.
Cost-effectiveness: Reduces management overhead.
Insightful Reporting: Enables swift response to threats.
Seamless Integration: Enhances security processes with existing tools.

Check Point WAF is employed in industries securing web applications and APIs, especially in multi-cloud environments. It effectively protects backend services, prevents unauthorized access, and monitors traffic, making it suitable for businesses with diverse infrastructures. It ensures compliance with security standards and adapts to fluctuating traffic patterns.

Check Point Software Technologies

Sample Customers

Shutterfly, S&P Global, Snap Finance, Snapdocs, and The Access Group

Orange España, Paschoalotto

ArmorCode vs. Check Point WAF (formerly CloudGuard WAF)