We performed a comparison between ARIS Process Governance and Camunda based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's a very easy-to-use product."
"Using this solution we can design our own processor governance, assign some specific technical services, and also run tests of the process to make sure it operates as we need it to."
"Ability to use all the features that your catalog has inside the modeling and export it to a BPM augmentation engine."
"I've found the active community most valuable but it also provides you with a lot of other features."
"The solution is easily compatible with HTML forms and HTML language programming and that is the most significant part."
", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."
"Overall, the solution has been very solid."
"It is open-source. It supports microservice orchestration. This is what we are really interested in. We can customize our products depending on the use cases."
"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."
"We can share, discuss, and develop the model together — from a distance. It's really helped us during these times of isolation."
"Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate."
"It's a bit annoying that you have to use two environments in the older version."
"There is a lot of complexity around licensing."
"The solution uses a coding language for process design that is specific only to this product. We would like to see this changed to something more universal."
"The primary issue regarding the Camuto platform is its high cost of training. This is why I haven't discussed it extensively, as compared to other products that are more affordable in terms of developer training."
"It would be helpful to have more readily available use cases on the internet. Camunda's documentation feels less comprehensive."
"The product must provide more videos and training materials."
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI."
"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."
"Camunda Platform's customer support could be improved because their response is quite slow."
"We have faced problems with the performance."
"The documentation could use improvement."
ARIS Process Governance is ranked 34th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 3 reviews while Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews. ARIS Process Governance is rated 8.0, while Camunda is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ARIS Process Governance writes "Easy to use, reliable, and simple to expand". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". ARIS Process Governance is most compared with , whereas Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian. See our ARIS Process Governance vs. Camunda report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
