Ardoq vs OpenText ProVision comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Ardoq Logo
1,180 views|915 comparisons
50% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
214 views|137 comparisons
66% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Ardoq and OpenText ProVision based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Architecture Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Ardoq vs. OpenText ProVision Report (Updated: May 2024).
770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a stable solution.""Snapshots are the most valuable feature."

More Ardoq Pros →

"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information.""The stability of the product is very good.""All the features come as part of a standard license."

More OpenText ProVision Pros →

Cons
"The training environment wasn't very intuitive, but maybe with more use, it will get better.""Scalability as a standalone system is good, given the information that has been described inside Ardoq. But not the scalability as a third-party system or with integration with other systems. Because in this direction, the scalability is about zero for Ardoq."

More Ardoq Cons →

"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use.""Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments.""Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."

More OpenText ProVision Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We pay for extended support."
  • More Ardoq Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Hi @Cheryl Joseph ​Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then… more »
    Top Answer:Here is a comparison of Ardoq and Sparx Systems, two popular Enterprise Architecture Management (EAM) tools Ardoq Pros: o Ardoq has a user-friendly interface that makes it easy to create and… more »
    Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information.
    Top Answer:OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use. In the next release, OpenText ProVision should combine intelligence capability with process modeling.
    Ranking
    Views
    1,180
    Comparisons
    915
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    448
    Rating
    7.5
    Views
    214
    Comparisons
    137
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    197
    Rating
    5.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Metastorm ProVision
    Learn More
    Overview

    A Dynamic and Data-Driven Approach to Enterprise Architecture
    Engage and connect stakeholders across the organization with business-friendly visualizations understandable to all.

    OpenText’s MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes
    Sample Customers
    Schibsted, Government of Malmo, Torvald
    Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government8%
    Retailer6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Energy/Utilities Company17%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Ardoq vs. OpenText ProVision
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Ardoq vs. OpenText ProVision and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    770,616 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Ardoq is ranked 11th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 2 reviews while OpenText ProVision is ranked 24th in Enterprise Architecture Management with 3 reviews. Ardoq is rated 7.6, while OpenText ProVision is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of Ardoq writes "Provides stable performance and scalability but not intuitive for data modeling". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText ProVision writes "Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration". Ardoq is most compared with LeanIX, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect, BiZZdesign HoriZZon, MEGA HOPEX and OrbusInfinity, whereas OpenText ProVision is most compared with ARIS BPA, Visio, Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect and SAP Signavio Process Manager. See our Ardoq vs. OpenText ProVision report.

    See our list of best Enterprise Architecture Management vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Architecture Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.