We performed a comparison between Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness and Proofpoint Email Protection based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Proofpoint, KnowBe4, Sophos and others in Security Awareness Training."The service's customers get some form of training every two weeks to help fight against common attacks."
"The solution offers very good flexibility. You can blacklist or whitelist with ease."
"Proofpoint Email Protection's initial installation is straightforward. It took us less than a day to complete the implementation."
"The most valuable feature is the option to edit the inbound security."
"The spam filter for email is good."
"The most valuable features of Proofpoint Email Protection are ease of use, data loss prevention, antivirus, and spam protection."
"The solution has very strong detection for most of the phishing and malicious emails received from the outside."
"The solution blocks malicious emails containing viruses and malware and reduces them out of spam."
"The most valuable feature of Proofpoint Email Protection is the TAP Dashboard. It provides more detailed information that can be used for forensic analysis. This is an advantage that other email security providers, such as Cisco, IronPort, or Microsoft do not offer in their dashboards."
"Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness should have increased flexibility for creating any training."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The product's deployment is complex and requires technical knowledge."
"Proofpoint Email Protection could improve on the training. Every organization is different and to fine-tune it to block everything properly there needs to be better training. Sometimes it can block some of the information it shouldn't."
"Sometimes it detects false positives."
"The reporting section could be enhanced. I like some reports but if they could allow us to create custom reports with more flexibility it would enhance the reports more."
"It has too many screens. It is kind of a conglomeration of products. In other words, they built product A, product B, and product C, and they are yet to integrate them into a single administrative console. I would certainly like to see a more seamless administrative interface. I would also like to see them include more bang for the buck, by including features like email fraud protection, rather than making their product so piecemeal, where you are buying little pieces. I agree with the idea of having multiple tiers or layers, but maybe as small, medium, and large, as opposed to an a la carte menu."
"Proofpoint Email Protection could improve by allowing more customization of the reports, such as exceptions and black-and-white lists."
"The largest complaint that we hear from our customers is that there is no local support."
More Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness Pricing and Cost Advice →
Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness is ranked 12th in Security Awareness Training with 1 review while Proofpoint Email Protection is ranked 1st in Security Awareness Training with 44 reviews. Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness is rated 0.0, while Proofpoint Email Protection is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness writes "A reasonably-priced service to help build a culture of security with a good technical support team". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Proofpoint Email Protection writes "A reasonably priced product that offers protection to emails, along with spam filters". Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness is most compared with KnowBe4, whereas Proofpoint Email Protection is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Office 365, Microsoft Exchange Online Protection (EOP), Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Cisco Secure Email and Fortinet FortiMail.
See our list of best Security Awareness Training vendors.
We monitor all Security Awareness Training reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
