ArcSight Logger and Elastic Security are both formidable in the security information and event management category. Elastic Security seems to have the upper hand due to its scalability, threat detection capabilities, and advanced threat hunting as highlighted by user reviews.
Features: ArcSight Logger users benefit from comprehensive event log management, efficient data auditing, and detailed log analysis. Elastic Security is valued for its scalable threat detection features, superior visualization tools, and ease of integration with other data sources.
Room for Improvement: ArcSight Logger faces integration complexities, a steep learning curve, and user challenges in mastering technical aspects. Elastic Security requires better documentation, seeks more seamless support options, and clearer configuration clarity as highlighted by users.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ArcSight Logger has a straightforward deployment requiring technical expertise and is recognized for responsive customer service. Elastic Security offers flexible deployment models but involves complex configurations and has a need for improved support channels.
Pricing and ROI: ArcSight Logger involves a high initial setup cost but offers fair ROI with its log management capabilities. Elastic Security, while also necessitating a significant upfront investment, is perceived to deliver better ROI due to integrated security features and adaptability to dynamic threats.
It does not require hefty security budgets and can be deployed for enterprise security effectively.
We provide pre-implementation, implementation, and post-implementation support.
Most of the time when my team encounters issues, they receive responses within 24 hours.
Support is prompt and helpful.
It allows us to think about specific use cases, such as gathering malicious IPs in a single view and analyzing threats based on geolocation.
In terms of stability, I would rate Elastic a solid eight out of ten.
Splunk does much more than SIEM, including log analysis, user behavior analysis, threat intelligence, and customer behavior analysis.
CrowdStrike and Defender have more established threat intelligence integration due to having a larger client base.
My security testing team continuously reports vulnerabilities, and we have to fix and update the versions frequently.
Elastic Security consumes a lot of resources, requiring a substantial deployment setup.
This is beneficial for SMEs as they do not need extensive budgets for security solutions.
The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building their security infrastructure.
Elastic Security is considered cost-effective, especially at lower EPS levels.
ArcSight Logger installs on very minimal resources with very few requirements
The platform provides more visibility and requires less effort in monitoring.
Elastic Security is as flexible and configurable as Microsoft Sentinel.
We require rapid processing speed for alerts and event data, and Elastic Security is very efficient at handling this level of data.
Elastic Security combines the features of a security information and event management (SIEM) system with endpoint protection, allowing organizations to detect, investigate, and respond to threats in real time. This unified approach helps reduce complexity and improve the efficiency of security operations.
Additional offerings and benefits:
Finally, Elastic Security benefits from a global community of users who contribute to its threat intelligence, helping to enhance its detection capabilities. This collaborative approach ensures that the solution remains on the cutting edge of cybersecurity, with up-to-date information on the latest threats and vulnerabilities.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
