We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Network Analytics and Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Darktrace, Vectra AI, Auvik and others in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA)."Using the Cognitive Analytics feature, we have complete visibility that we didn’t have before."
"The most valuable feature is NetFlow. The beginning of any security investigation starts with NetFlow data."
"The most valuable features are encrypted threat analysis and the ability to run jobs on entire flows."
"Overall, the implementation is very good."
"Provides easily identifiable anomalies that you can't see with signature detections."
"The solution allowed us to not only get gain insight but also start collaborating with other tools."
"The fact that it can identify down to an IP address of a system that is causing problems, or potentially causing problems, is very valuable."
"Cisco Stealthwatch has predefined alerts for different types of security issues that might happen in the network. Whether it's PCs or servers that are used for botnets or Bitcoin mining we receive the alerts automatically. This functionality is what we receive from the solution out of the box."
"One or two people can maintain and support the solution. The maintenance is not difficult."
"The most valuable features of the Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System are the AI detection and monitoring of common threats."
More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Pros →
"The initial setup is complex, as there is a lot to configure."
"I would like to see some improvement when it comes to reporting."
"I would like Cisco to make it easier for the administrators to use it."
"The overall visibility into the actual device itself would be helpful. I don't just want support-specific data, but also to be able to see information such as CPU and other internal components or usage of the devices."
"The customizability of the UI should improve."
"It's too complicated to install, when starting out."
"I would like the search page available with Cisco Stealthwatch to be more intuitive. The previous release was better than the current one for the UI."
"We need to be able to filter out internal IPs as non-threats."
"Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System can improve by having more anti-spam features that will hopefully eliminate all of the other threats."
"The UI dashboard view needs to be improved because it is ugly. If it was more modern it would be better. Additionally, better integration with other databases would be good."
More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Cons →
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Secure Network Analytics is ranked 4th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 57 reviews while Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is ranked 12th in Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) with 2 reviews. Cisco Secure Network Analytics is rated 8.2, while Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Network Analytics writes "Increased the visibility of what is happening in our network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System writes "Beneficial AI detection, helpful support, but modern UI needed". Cisco Secure Network Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Secure Cloud Analytics, ThousandEyes, Vectra AI and Arista NDR, whereas Hillstone I-Series Server Breach Detection System is most compared with Fortinet FortiWeb.
See our list of best Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) vendors.
We monitor all Network Traffic Analysis (NTA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.