"The most valuable feature of ARCON Privileged Access Management is the recording of sessions. It has all the basic features we need to fulfill our use case."
"That dashboard is okay."
"100% compliant and you don't have to maintain ID management for each and every user."
"Its video recording capabilities have definitely been key for us."
"I like that it's Linux-based, and you don't need to have separate implementations, extra database licenses, or enterprise licenses. I think because it's Linux-based, it's more seamless than Windows. I also like the access manager, which I think is a super tool. Everything is browser-based, and you don't need a VPN. So, that's a great thing."
"There are some features lacking but they typically are added when the upgrades are released."
"Managing users is difficult, so that is something that can be improved."
"Hazard flow could be improved, the data compliance portion."
"For me, the main issue has to do with the system performance itself."
"It would be better if I could manage multiple accounts in one place, like CyberArk. With WALLIX, you can only manage one account, and you are given a separate category. You have to click on each connection to do anything. For example, CyberArk might give three options for one connection if you want to have an interactive user-level experience. But with WALLIX, you have to click three times to get that access. Also, the biggest disadvantage of WALLIX is the reporting. I feel like it's very weak in reporting when compared to the other solutions. As a solution, they're good and stable. But they need to make their reports neater and better. Right now, we're going to the console and then pressing buttons every single time."
More ARCON Privileged Access Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
ARCON Privileged Access Management is ranked 9th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 3 reviews while WALLIX Bastion is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 2 reviews. ARCON Privileged Access Management is rated 7.4, while WALLIX Bastion is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of ARCON Privileged Access Management writes "Simple and 100% compliant with great features; saved us many hours of down time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WALLIX Bastion writes "A stable privileged access managed service with an useful secure and seamless access management feature". ARCON Privileged Access Management is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Symantec Privileged Access Manager, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, Delinea Secret Server and One Identity Manager, whereas WALLIX Bastion is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access, One Identity Safeguard, Delinea Secret Server and Symantec Privileged Access Manager. See our ARCON Privileged Access Management vs. WALLIX Bastion report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
