Apache Web Server vs SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL] comparison

Apache and SAP are both solutions in the Application Infrastructure category. Apache is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.7, while SAP is ranked #18. Apache holds a 9.4% mindshare in AIS, compared to SAP’s 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Apache users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SAP users who would recommend it.

Apache Web Server

Read 24 Apache Web Server reviews

2,048 Views
2,028 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Po...

Read 3 SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL] reviews

582 Views
559 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Apache Web Server

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Po...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 15, 2026

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal and Apache Web Server both serve as platforms with distinct purposes. Apache Web Server seems superior due to its flexibility, modular design, and broad compatibility.

Features: SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal offers integrated enterprise solutions, seamless connectivity across business applications, and coordination across diverse tools. Apache Web Server provides versatility, a modular design, and extensive customization, suitable for developers seeking an adaptable solution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal requires a complex setup and benefits from specialized enterprise-level support channels. Apache Web Server offers a straightforward deployment process, ideal for teams able to manage configurations independently.

Pricing and ROI: SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal involves higher setup costs, aiming for long-term ROI in large-scale operations. Apache Web Server has a lower initial cost, making it a cost-effective, scalable solution often seen as providing higher ROI due to adaptability for web-based needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Application Infrastructure Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 889,955 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Apache Web Server

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Po...

Ranking in Application Infrastructure

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Application Infrastructure category, the mindshare of Apache Web Server is 9.4%, down from 10.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL] is 2.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Infrastructure Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Apache Web Server	9.4%
SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal	2.3%
Other	88.3%

Application Infrastructure

Featured Reviews

Dimitrios Zigkos

Enterprise Architect at Smals vzw

Faced limitations with integration and long-term adaptability but benefited from a lightweight architecture for standalone applications

I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server. You can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it. The compatibility with multiple operating systems has helped my operations since most of the time we use Linux. Some systems rely on Windows, but they are few; in the past, Windows was the dominant operating system for mainstream PCs and infrastructure, but not for business. All the companies I worked for had 90% Linux and maybe up to 10% Windows. The initial setup of Apache Web Server was straightforward and okay.

Read full review

reviewer1582677

CTO / Executive Director for Information Technology at a logistics company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Improves business processes, highly stable, and reliable

We are in Serbia and we are providing data center services for other countries, such as Montenegro, Bosnia, and Hercegovina. We are using this solution as an ERP at the moment. This covers all of our business processes, this includes sales, distribution, data management, finance, and compliance…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In my experience, Apache Web Server has been a good and stable solution."

"Apache is a powerful tool with which you can make it do just about anything you need."

"Apache Web Server effectively runs any web application, including Java-based applications, and includes Apache Tomcat server, which is crucial."

"Apache Web Server can be used as a proxy server"

"The Apache Web Server is our software of choice for running our web servers for the past seven (7) years."

"I find valuable and beneficial the independence that comes with Apache Web Server; you can build a small project using a simple application server without bothering too much about how to manage it."

"It's very stable, and it hosts one of the biggest of many biggest web applications in the world."

"The solution offers good security."

More Apache Web Server pros

"The technical support is good."

"They integrated it with the SAP router."

"From the use of this solution, we have been able to establish better processes and have greater management of our company."

"The technical support is good."

"Internal workflow approval around ESS and MSS leave days, capex approval as well as internal communication to the business have improved the way my organization functions."

"From the use of this solution, we have been able to establish better processes and have greater management of our company."

"Workflow functionality and internal portal capabilities are the most important features."

Cons

"So far, for us, everything is okay."

"If Apache master the ability of hosting websites/web apps that use Microsoft's .Net framework then it will definitely be the best web server to use."

"Things change very fast. We're always on the lookout for better approaches and tools. If the solution falls behind, we may have to switch."

"Lacks integration with some cloud solutions."

"You know what? I found negligible difference between Apache and Nginx."

"Apache Server and the Nginx also do not require any licenses, and I think because of this that the support is not so good for us."

"There isn't a dedicated customer support available"

"For NGINX, I think it has NGINX Management Suite, which is GUI-based and allows you to manage your configuration via the user interface, but Apache fails to offer such capabilities to users."

More Apache Web Server cons

"Due to our business, some setups were very complex."

"We encountered stability issues, especially on external functionality around its RFP capabilities."

"The user interface could be improved by making it more user-friendly."

"The cost of this solution is high."

"We encountered stability issues, especially on external functionality around its RFP capabilities."

"Our customers expect that a page will open within one second, and I doubt this will happen. Also, opening documentation takes time."

"External portal functionality with suppliers and customers needs improvement."

"Our customers expect that a page will open within one second, and I doubt this will happen. Also, opening documentation takes time. Fixing this will help the customer and help to meet their expectations."

More SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There is no licensing cost for the product."

"The apache software is free, open-source."

"It is a free-of-cost solution."

"It is an open-source solution."

"The cost of this solution is high."

"SAP is not for every business. It depends on what is required. SAP is always going to be expensive."

"Because India is so competitive in the IT world, people will start to move away from SAP's pricing because they have a market monopoly. Soon, they will start losing the monopoly part to open source and other things. I don't think their monopoly will run for more than three to four years because people are getting away from these monopolies."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Infrastructure solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	11

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Apache Web Server?

There are no fees associated with the usage of Apache Web Server in my projects. If you want to have support, then there is some cost, but today I do not know how many companies pay for that servic...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Apache Web Server?

I would like to see improvements in the functionality and core of Apache Web Server, focusing on building an infrastructure that can be resilient and robust enough to handle resource shortages, and...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Apache Web Server?

I am currently working with Apache Web Server in my projects because I'm an architect. Some years ago, it was the application server and the web server; it was Apache Daemon and Apache, the web ser...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IIS vs Apache Web Server

Compared 22% of the time

NGINX Plus vs Apache Web Server

Compared 17% of the time

Magic xpa Application Platform vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

Windows Server AppFabric vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft .NET Framework vs Apache Web Server

Compared 6% of the time

More Apache Web Server Competitors

IIS vs SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL]

Compared 17% of the time

NGINX Plus vs SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL]

Compared 13% of the time

IBM DataPower Gateway vs SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft .NET Framework vs SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL]

Compared 12% of the time

WebLogic Suite vs SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL]

Compared 9% of the time

More SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Apache Web Server

April 2026

Download Apache Web Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

April 2026

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL] report

Download SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Apache HTTP Server

NetWeaver Enterprise Portal, SAP Portal

Overview

The Apache HTTP Server Project was founded in 1995 by a group of webmasters, known as The Apache Group, with the aim of developing robust, richly-featured, freely-available and commercial-standard Web (HTTP) server source code. The result was Apache Web Server or Apache HTTP Server, which is an open-source public-domain web server.

This collaborative project has been enhanced ever since with contributions from the core development team and other volunteers situated all over the globe. Also, hundreds of users of this open-source web server have contributed code, ideas, and documentation. The project falls under The Apache Software Foundation, which manages many open-source projects.

Apache

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL] served as an effective platform providing multiple business solutions through an integrated portal, enhancing system functionality and access to enterprise information.

Initially launched to streamline business processes, SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL] empowered users to personalize and manage content delivery effectively across systems. Its infrastructure facilitated seamless integration, offering users a comprehensive platform to access critical business data, collaborate, and enhance management efficiencies. The advanced capabilities catered to specific business needs, making it a reliable choice for organizations seeking to optimize processes.

What are the most important features?

Content Management: Offers tools for organizing, managing, and accessing enterprise content efficiently.
Integration: Seamlessly connects with different business applications, enhancing workflow processes.
Collaboration: Provides features to promote team collaboration and information sharing.
Personalization: Allows customization of content and access based on user roles and preferences.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Productivity: Enables faster access to information, boosting efficiency.
Scalability: Supports growth with its ability to handle increased data and user load.
Cost Efficiency: Streamlines operations, reducing costs associated with multiple platforms.
Security: Provides robust security measures to protect enterprise data.

SAP NetWeaver Enterprise Portal [EOL] found applications across different industries including manufacturing, finance, and healthcare, where it was used to facilitate efficient data management and enhance decision-making processes. Tailored functionalities met industry-specific needs, proving invaluable in sectors where integration and secure data access were crucial.

SAP

Sample Customers

Cisco, Intuit, General Electric, Adobe, VMware, PayPal, HP, EMC, eBay, Apple, SAP, Qualcomm, SanDisk, Allstate, FedEx

Alliander N.V.

Buyer's Guide

Application Infrastructure

April 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, IBM, F5 and others in Application Infrastructure. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

889,955 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.

We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.