We compared Azul Zing and Azul Zulu based on our user's reviews in several parameters.
Overall, users praise Azul Zing for its exceptional performance, efficient garbage collection, and reliability, while emphasizing its seamless integration and superior scalability. On the other hand, Azul Zulu is valued for its excellent performance, security measures, and robust integration, alongside concerns about specific features, performance, and platform compatibility. Azul Zing is applauded for its customer service and support, competitive pricing, and positive return on investment, while Azul Zulu is appreciated for its highly responsive support team and efficient service. However, users have pointed out areas for improvement for both products, including enhancing speed and performance, addressing compatibility issues, and optimizing memory management.
Features: Azul Zing is praised for its efficient garbage collection, enhanced stability, and superior scalability. In contrast, Azul Zulu offers comprehensive support, extensive compatibility, robust security measures, and the ability to work effectively across different programming languages and frameworks.
Pricing and ROI: Azul Zing is known for its favorable pricing and reasonable setup cost, according to user feedback. Users have also praised its licensing process. In comparison, users have provided feedback on Azul Zulu's pricing, setup cost, and licensing. They have shared their experiences and opinions about these aspects., Azul Zing has proven to be a valuable investment with a positive return, while Azul Zulu offers highly satisfactory ROI according to reviewers. Users reported positive gains, efficiency, performance enhancements, improved productivity, cost savings, compatibility, and reliable support.
Room for Improvement: Azul Zing could benefit from improvements such as enhancing performance and speed, resolving compatibility issues, optimizing memory management, reducing resource consumption, addressing crashes or instability, and improving documentation. On the other hand, Azul Zulu requires enhancements in certain features, platform compatibility, and performance, along with addressing specific functionalities and compatibility issues across different operating systems.
Deployment and customer support: The user reviews for both Azul Zing and Azul Zulu emphasize the importance of considering the context in which terms like deployment, setup, or implementation phases are used when discussing the time required for establishing a new tech solution. Users have provided examples of timeframes, such as three months for deployment and an additional week for setup, that should be taken into account. Similarly, if a user required a week for deployment and another week for setup, it is likely they are referring to the same period and should not be considered separately., Azul Zing has received commendable feedback for their customer service, with prompt and efficient problem resolution. Users appreciate Azul Zulu's highly responsive and helpful support, offering effective solutions and ensuring a positive experience.
The summary above is based on user interviews we conducted recently with Azul Zing and Azul Zulu users. To access the review's full transcripts, download our report.
Azul Zing is ranked 16th in Application Infrastructure while Azul Zulu is ranked 13th in Application Infrastructure. Azul Zing is rated 9.6, while Azul Zulu is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Azul Zing writes "We no longer need to concern ourselves with tuning the garbage collector or coding around it, but the profiling tools lag behind those available for Oracle's Java implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Azul Zulu writes "It is based on OpenJDK so you obtain practically the same performance compared to Hotspot". Azul Zing is most compared with Oracle Hotspot and Zulu Embedded, whereas Azul Zulu is most compared with Oracle Hotspot, Zulu Embedded, Apache Web Server, SAP NetWeaver Business Rules Management and NGINX Plus.
See our list of best Application Infrastructure vendors.
We monitor all Application Infrastructure reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.