Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Anvilogic vs OpenText Enterprise Security Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 21, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Anvilogic
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
16th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
AI-SOC (2nd)
OpenText Enterprise Securit...
Ranking in Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
21st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
98
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) category, the mindshare of Anvilogic is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Enterprise Security Manager is 1.6%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Anvilogic0.3%
OpenText Enterprise Security Manager1.6%
Other98.1%
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
 

Featured Reviews

Jason Murphy - PeerSpot reviewer
Improves SOC response times and simplifies alert management through efficient customization
The 'we need something better' moment was triggered when we were trying to roll out custom alerts with Splunk Enterprise Security; it was atrocious to do that. You would have to clone things and then reuse alerts you made. Just making new alerts, the process was not very good, and there was no versioning for all the alerts we create. So we had to trust Splunk for what they created. Rolling out new alerts was a pain since you had to load them up in a new app and things similar to that. With Anvilogic, they made it super simple. I can describe a process where they have something they refer to as the Armory. You just go to the Armory, click all the things you want. It automatically pushes it down to your Splunk Enterprise with their app loaded up on there if you modify it as needed. It tends to just work, and you can customize it easily since it tells you the Splunk language plus the normal human language. So it makes modifying it simple with rollback versioning. They have groups based on known attackers coming for you, and you can group them together that way and deploy a whole set of alerts designed just for those specific use cases of those attackers and their IOCs. Aside from the easy custom alerting with Anvilogic, the next feature I appreciate most is that they also standardized bringing in the logs. They set some macros that help standardize and make more sense than Splunk. They teach you and give you insights every morning or every week, saying, 'Hey, this is not working, so what do you want. You're getting one or two of these alerts per day. Do you want to squash them from error to warning?' They're always giving you tips on how to improve the efficiency of the system itself. Creating scenarios was amazing. In Anvilogic's case, you create scenarios based on MITRE ATT&CK framework. Every rule that fits that MITRE will get used. My usage with Anvilogic has evolved since onboarding. After about two or three years, they started offering their cloud-based SOC where instead of just using Splunk as a data set, you could run your searches against Snowflake databases, Demisto, and others including Azure log storage. Their generative AI work has been fantastic as it's very specific in what you need to do. The route they've gone with the different types of AI agents aligns exactly with what I was hoping the market would do. Seeing them do the Tier Zero for SOC-type stuff with their playbooks has been impressive. Since adopting Anvilogic, our team's quick SOC response has become essential. We have been known to respond within five to seven minutes to an attacker compromising an account.
Ramnesh  Dubey - PeerSpot reviewer
Allows for monitoring logs according to industry standards within ESM but has a total capacity capped at 12 TB, limiting real-time data retention periods
The first limitation is with the ArcSight Data Storage Manager (ADSM). ArcSight's total capacity is currently capped at 12 TB. This becomes an issue if a customer needs a longer real-time data retention period, such as exceeding 90 days or reaching a year or even ten months. Increasing the disk space beyond 12 TB is not currently possible. So, increasing the storage capacity is one area for improvement. Additionally, the real-time data retention is limited due to the 12 TB restriction. Depending on the Events Per Second (EPS) you receive, you might only be able to retain data for seven to ten days. Overall, the 12 TB limit is the main issue we face in terms of maximizing real-time data storage. Moreover, there are a few improvements I would like to see in future releases. My main suggestion for ArcSight is to simplify the deployment process. Currently, the installation process is quite complex. There are various components involved, including transformations, multiple installations, and containerization for various components. Ideally, I'd recommend that ArcSight allow the entire installation, including the ESM and database, to be completed within a single unified setup process for a streamlined experience. Additionally, having readily available and well-organized documentation for the step-by-step installation process would be incredibly helpful. I would also like to see better support.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"They teach you and give you insights every morning or every week, saying, 'Hey, this is not working, so what do you want. You're getting one or two of these alerts per day. Do you want to squash them from error to warning?' They're always giving you tips on how to improve the efficiency of the system itself."
"We are partnering very closely with Anvilogic and pushing the threshold of detection engineering capabilities; we are only able to do many of these capabilities due to the partnership that we have with Anvilogic, where they are meeting what we need to continually push new innovative solutions."
"One of the best things about Anvilogic is the partnership, their knowledge, the depth of technical understanding, and the speed at which they respond."
"The deployment was very simple."
"Before Anvilogic, we had no visibility into our detection coverage. The ability to break it down by industry verticals, such as attackers and adversaries, is valuable."
"The solution has gone beyond signature-based monitoring and analysis and is AI-powered. It is good enough to cover the full range of cybersecurity services."
"There are many features that are good for clients who are looking for a good SIEM solution. They like the ease of creating a business that is effective and impressive."
"The user interfaces are quite good and speedy."
"It is a very useful tool for intelligence building because it has many use cases and many rule sets."
"The feature that I have found the most useful is that it can be deployed to the cloud."
"We use ArcSight ESM for log analysis and security alerts. It warns us of threats and then helps us conduct a forensic investigation of a cyber attack or internal incident after it happens."
"ArcSight is customizable. You can integrate just about anything. I also like the ease of use."
"ArcSight ESM provides us the flexibility to write our own passwords and customize the solution. It lets us search and log a variety of SmartConnectors. It has 480-plus SmartConnectors."
 

Cons

"The hunting insight needs integrable capability with different platforms to gather all of that insight and show it on a single canvas on Anvilogic. That is the only feature that could improve the way we do operations."
"The pricing is slightly edging towards being a bit much for smaller organizations."
"Anvilogic could be better in areas of the triage dashboard as they're beholden to Splunk's functionality."
"Anvilogic can be improved by adding the ability to do on-ingest detections. This is something that we have been having a conversation on for a short time now, but I am hopeful that they will have that in their future roadmap."
"I would like for them to integrate mobile devices. Integration or any kind of functionality which will act as a substitute for IBM so that we can really track our mobile devices as well as look at SIEM."
"The UI interface is somewhat complex and needs to be simplified."
"I would like to have a feature that gives us an entire report listing what devices are integrated."
"ArcSight ESM's UI is a little cumbersome and complex, especially for first-time and occasional users using the console manager."
"They should try to include business logic vulnerabilities in the SIEM tool."
"The dashboard looks a bit cumbersome."
"The onboarding process for this solution could be better. It also needs a better GUI."
"The analytics feature is not reliable and needs improvement for more detailed analysis.​"
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We were an early adopter, so the pricing was definitely good. Because they do not completely replace a SIEM, their pricing is slowly edging towards being a little too much for a smaller organization like ours. It is almost on the border."
"Anvilogic's pricing has been highly competitive."
"HPE ArcSight pricing might be more expensive than other SIEM solutions, but in my opinion it has powerful features and great flexibility in developing complex use cases."
"It's a good price, it's one of the cheaper solutions."
"The pricing is great compared to others."
"The pricing model is expensive compared to open-source alternatives."
"The licensing cost is affordable if you get an enterprise license. The licensing is based on EPS, so you can probably provide a package of license for multiple ESMs with their correlational end fees. It is cost-effective."
"​It is best to be an institutional buyer and directly contact the sales team, as they can provide over-the-top discounts for bulk orders.​"
"Thanks to Micro Focus's licensing model, as an MSSP, we are able to see a complete return on our investment almost immediately."
"We have a license to use this solution. The price of ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager is expensive."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) solutions are best for your needs.
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

VS
Jun 28, 2015
Qradar vs. ArcSight
Continuing with the SIEM posts we have done at Infosecnirvana, this post is a Head to head comparison of the two Industry leading SIEM products in the market – HP ArcSight and IBM QRadar Both the products have consistently been in the Gartner Leaders Quadrant. Both HP and IBM took over niche SIEM…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Performing Arts
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business37
Midsize Enterprise14
Large Enterprise57
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Anvilogic?
My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Anvilogic was the easiest experience I have ever had.
What needs improvement with Anvilogic?
Anvilogic could be better in areas of the triage dashboard as they're beholden to Splunk's functionality. I need to click three times to get to all the information I need. Enterprise Security did t...
What is your primary use case for Anvilogic?
My main use case for Anvilogic is for triage in the SOC. That's the primary use case.
Which is the best SIEM tool for a mid-sized financial services firm: Arcsight or Securonix?
In my market, a lot of financial companies had or have an ArcSight installation. Just because in former times it was pretty good. Now a lot of them are looking for a more effective solution due to ...
What do you like most about ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?
We utilize ArcSight ESM for real-time threat detection in our organization. We have custom rules that we've developed on top of the WAN services, along with scheduled licensing activities.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM)?
ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager (ESM) is very cheap compared to other tools. It is worth the investment if you are considering the cost.
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus ArcSight, HPE ArcSight, ArcSight
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Lake Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bank AlJazira, Banca Intesa, and Obrela.
Find out what your peers are saying about Anvilogic vs. OpenText Enterprise Security Manager and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.