No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Anomali vs Purple AI comparison

Why PeerSpot?
Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.2
Torq's automation enhances efficiency, reduces manual tasks, and offers noticeable cost savings and productivity improvements within the first year.
Sentiment score
6.0
Anomali improves ROI by enhancing SOC efficiency, reducing manual processes, and increasing productivity through automation and AI.
Sentiment score
4.6
Purple AI delivers positive ROI for large enterprises, aids threat detection, and requires manual checks for critical issues.
Since we started working with Torq, I am handling much fewer alerts. It is becoming really easy for me to handle an alert.
SOC Analyst at AppsFlyer
We have seen a return on investment, targeting a $600,000 ROI for the year.
Cyber Security Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 5,001-10,000 employees
I have seen a return on investment with Torq, as the automation reduces the number of employees needed and significantly saves both time and resources.
Senior Cybersecurity Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Analyst productivity has improved significantly, with hours saved because of automation and AI-driven work that Anomali performs.
Global Leadership Council at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Anomali provides us with a very cost-effective value compared to the market, and I would rate it ten out of ten for return on investment metrics.
Solution Delivery Advisor at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
There is a return on investment concerning time and effort saved by 40% after implementing Anomali.
Security Consultant at Deloitte
It provides us with a summary of the alert and suggests what suspicious activities have occurred, along with guidance on what to look for next.
IT Security Analyst at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
We have achieved good ROI with Purple AI.
Threat Engineer at Proficio
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.6
Torq's customer support is praised for responsiveness, attentiveness, 24/7 availability, and effectively assisting with setup and critical issues.
Sentiment score
5.0
Anomali's customer service is praised for expertise and support, though smaller clients face response time challenges.
Sentiment score
6.1
Purple AI's customer service is highly rated, providing swift, direct access to experts for efficient and smooth assistance.
My impression of their technical support during the initial setup was that they were helpful, responded within a reasonable timeframe, and provided exactly what we needed.
Security Consultant at Integrity360
The speed and quality of their answers have been pretty good, as I usually get a response within 24 hours, and they follow up well.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
We can always get an answer, and the support team are experts in their own system.
Director Of Cyber Security at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
They have strong onboarding and deployment assistance, provide a dedicated technical account manager for large customers, and engage in regular product updates and customer interaction.
Global Leadership Council at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
The technical support at Anomali is excellent.
Senior Cyber Threat Hunter at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
It doesn't seem very professional how they're handling support anymore.
Enterprise Security Architect V at FirstEnergy
We just directly get connected to the technical person.
Threat Engineer at Proficio
I would rate the technical support for Purple AI an eight out of ten.
IT Security Analyst at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Torq excels in scalability with customization, handling high volumes, though browser issues may occur with large workflows.
Sentiment score
8.0
Anomali offers scalable threat intelligence solutions, supporting organizations' growth with seamless tool integration and unlimited data management capacity.
Sentiment score
6.0
Purple AI is a scalable option with unique Flexi-license, though its full autonomous capabilities are still developing.
Its scalability is good because it has a cloud-native architecture and it expands dynamically to handle thousands of alerts at the same time.
Software Engineer at Accenture
Torq's scalability is a notable strength, as its workflow-based automation allows expansion from managing a few repetitive security tasks to handling more complex and high-volume SOC operations.
Data Specialist at TCS
Our case management is super scalable.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
The scalability is massive, allowing us to store millions of indicators.
Enterprise Security Architect V at FirstEnergy
I believe Anomali's scalability is good; whether it is an organization for ten people or one hundred thousand people, the job a threat intel platform has to do will be the same.
Sr. Threat Intelligence Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Anomali's scalability is impressive as a mature platform capable of processing large amounts of threat intelligence and indicators of compromise data.
Global Leadership Council at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
If we scale and add any two to three pieces within our existing plan, based on the endpoint, it gives the next term and when we pay the money, it adds that amount in the billing and it's quite easy.
Threat Engineer at Proficio
Purple AI has very high chances of scalability.
Soc Analyst at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
Purple AI works well for all types of alerts across various data sources and environments; hence, I find it good for scalability.
IT Security Analyst at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Torq is stable and reliable, offering consistent performance with minimal downtime and rare, quickly resolved issues.
Sentiment score
8.4
Anomali shows high stability and reliability globally but requires improved management of platform changes for better adaptation.
Sentiment score
7.3
Purple AI is stable and reliable but may require precise prompts and relies on SentinelOne's performance, causing occasional delays.
I evaluate it based on service availability, workflow execution reliability, integration failures, and incident history.
Cybersecurity Analyst at Digital Direct Solution Private Limited
Most of the time, the system is stable as long as the components that they integrate with are stable.
Director Of Cyber Security at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
I have never faced any downtime or issues.
Senior Information Technology Security Consultant at Mideast Data Systems
From a reliability perspective, Anomali consistently injects threat feeds, works on automation, performs reliable API integrations, and supports enterprise scale globally.
Global Leadership Council at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
For example, while Microsoft allows ample time for users to adapt to deprecated features, Anomali only gave us three weeks before switching, so they need to be more cognizant of customer use cases from their engineering side.
Enterprise Security Architect V at FirstEnergy
The good thing is that they have a health check page, and if any issues arise, they notify us.
Lead Cyber Threat Intelligence Incident Response Engineer & Security Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
The only concern is the prompting requirement, as we have to provide prompts in a proper manner, otherwise it will not work correctly.
Associate Vice President at Novac Technology Solutions
I have not faced any challenges when implementing Purple AI.
IT Security Consultant at Systemhaus for you GmbH
Sometimes it lacks performance and may take a while to load, or it may not show alerts at all, requiring us to log out and log back in.
IT Security Analyst at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
 

Room For Improvement

To improve Torq's platform, enhance error messaging, case management, UI, AI, integrations, templates, data handling, and reporting features.
Anomali needs AI upgrades, improved interface, better threat handling, expanded GenAI, streamlined features, and integration enhancements.
Purple AI should improve threat analysis, UI, and customization to enhance threat detection and match CrowdStrike's capabilities.
Torq should offer default templates that can directly scan firewall data and automate actions.
Senior Information Technology Security Consultant at Mideast Data Systems
The AI value depends on maturity. Real value depends heavily on telemetry, integration depth, and workflow design, all of which rely on how mature customers are in their SOC department.
Security Consultant at Integrity360
It was able to capture data but was unable to differentiate between the agent hostname we are using and the hostname that resides on the back end of the Internet.
Senior Consultant at a university with 10,001+ employees
Combining all aliases into a coherent solution would be beneficial, as we had to review each individual source ourselves.
Senior Cyber Threat Hunter at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Anomali should increase their capability to fetch details from various dark web solutions where threat actors post compromised credentials.
Lead Cyber Threat Intelligence Incident Response Engineer & Security Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Anomali's ability to correlate and integrate different Threat Intel platforms, such as Mandiant and PolySwarm, is another valuable feature, removing duplicacy and enabling the application of specific IOCs across various security controls.
Associate Consultant at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
AI combined with automation is a very powerful tool, and combining these could reduce both time and work because automation saves time for everyone.
Soc Analyst at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
As an improvement, if SentinelOne could focus on IOA similar to what CrowdStrike is giving, that would be a good point.
Senior Technical Engineer at Safezone Secure Solutions Private Limited
The only concern related to pricing is the ingestion-based pricing model, which is higher at scale.
Associate Vice President at Novac Technology Solutions
 

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers have mixed opinions on Torq's pricing, with some finding it affordable and others expensive but valuable.
Anomali offers medium to high pricing with flexible licensing, enterprise contracts, and trusted leadership influencing continued usage.
When they bring more and more value into the platform, it makes more sense to pay that price, but still, it is expensive.
Senior Cyber Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Before deciding to implement Torq, I considered that compared to our old case management platform, Torq was a much better price and had a lot better value for what you get out of the platform, which was a key consideration for the company.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
It is an expensive solution, not an inexpensive solution, but we get through the flexibility.
Director Of Cyber Security at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
Pricing and licensing are good, but the costs for purchasing threat feeds are somewhat complicated and a bit on the higher side.
Associate Consultant at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
My experience with Anomali's pricing is that it is higher compared to other open-source alternatives.
Senior Information Technology Security Consultant at Mideast Data Systems
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that there are not many follow-ups, but once we interacted with the product team or the leadership of Anomali, they managed a lot with us, and it all paid off to reach a conclusion that we would continue with this product.
Solution Delivery Advisor at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
Providing SentinelOne solution for small scale enterprise, if they could offer better prices, it would be more useful.
Threat Engineer at Proficio
I would say the solution is a little expensive.
Associate Vice President at Novac Technology Solutions
 

Valuable Features

Torq simplifies automation with a drag-and-drop interface, AI-driven alert management, and seamless third-party tool integration.
Anomali excels in threat intelligence with strong integrations, user-friendly features, and enhances efficiency in threat visibility and response.
Purple AI enhances threat detection and response with accurate predictions, deep visibility, and multi-language support for efficient analysis.
Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management has significantly benefited us by integrating the case management platform with the automation, which saves time compared to managing multiple point solutions across our security stack.
CyberSecurity Engineer at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
The fact that I can build whatever I want within my own imagination and skills without relying on code is the best thing about Torq.
Director Of Cyber Security at a tech vendor with 501-1,000 employees
You can copy and paste a cURL command. If you have documentation or APIs, you usually have an example on the side. You basically have all the information on how the API call should be. You can just copy that and paste it into a step, and it will just build the step for you.
Global IT Director at OpenWeb
Regarding integration, Anomali has capabilities to integrate with different downstream applications such as Palo Alto, allowing us to create playbooks to block domains, URLs, or IPs directly within the firewall.
Lead Cyber Threat Intelligence Incident Response Engineer & Security Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Correlating IOCs with the telemetry data we are ingesting from our data sources allows us to pull monthly reports identifying how many assets and users interacted with malicious content, giving insight into whether communications failed or users accessed restricted content, providing complete visibility of the IOCs traveling throughout our environment.
Associate Consultant at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
It aggregates intelligence from hundreds of sources, automatically de-duplicates, applies risk scoring, applies context, and reduces much manual effort.
Global Leadership Council at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
In today's world, the time to respond to an attack is key.
Senior Technical Engineer at Safezone Secure Solutions Private Limited
The best feature is that the summary is very precise, crisp, and presented in layman's language while still including all the technical aspects required for analysis.
Soc Analyst at a tech consulting company with 11-50 employees
Purple AI provides availability and ensures that all threat detection and response are available in a single platform.
Associate Vice President at Novac Technology Solutions
 

Categories and Ranking

Torq
Sponsored
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
21
Ranking in other categories
AI-SOC (1st), AI-Powered Security Automation (1st)
Anomali
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
13
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (9th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (5th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (3rd)
Purple AI
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.9
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
AI-SOC (3rd)
 

Featured Reviews

AD
Solutions Architect at ProArch
Automation has streamlined multi-tenant SOC workflows and improves alert handling efficiency
Although the reporting within Torq is not that great, we did ask for many features regarding reporting in Torq, but due to some platform constraints, they could not make the whole dataset available for us to be used in reporting. Except for that, we used some basic reporting. When I used Torq, it was indeed in the early stages of AI capabilities. Only a few customers were allowed to use it, and we were among them. It functioned well as long as we summarized the data properly. If you input garbage, you would get garbage out. Thus, we had to do significant fine-tuning regarding what data context we provided to the AI orchestrator to get meaningful results. In terms of Torq's unified platform approach to AI SOC automation and case management compared to managing multiple point solutions across my security stack, I find it case-centric. The unified view in case management is good since it provides clarity, although there are limitations regarding how many items in case management can be modified at once. Bulk operations are very limited, potentially due to their back-end database or data retrieval processes that can be improved. Regarding improvements for Torq, when we were onboarded, there were aspects we were uncertain about, such as the number of cases that could be generated, what data we could bring in, how many clients we could onboard, and similar concerns. Initially, we also lacked clarity about the number of playbooks or workflows we could build. Different triggers like system triggers, case-based triggers, and others can be employed without restrictions, but when it comes to on-demand and scheduled jobs, there is a limitation based on the subscription and pricing tier that notably caps the number of workflows we can create. No bulk editing across cases was one issue, along with limited filtering related to single grouping constraints. Additionally, the out-of-the-box case templates provided require substantial modifications before they become usable. There is also a feature in the cases for notes that cannot be searched. They are only visible through the UI, which is another area for improvement. The workflow and execution-based charges seem misleading as this was not discussed initially. I am not sure if new customers are made aware of this. It seems that workflows revolving around cases hinder functionality outside of case management, as we have many use cases needing on-demand triggers and schedules for functions like reporting or polling devices. Creating additional workflows to achieve basic functionalities raises costs significantly, which disadvantages customers. While they facilitate optimization and scaling, the support received tends to be very basic. Improvements can be made in that area as well.
TarunKumar11 - PeerSpot reviewer
Global Leadership Council at a tech company with 10,001+ employees
Strategic threat intelligence has improved detection speed and consistently reduces analyst workload
Anomali can be improved in various aspects. Its AI-driven automation can further advance, and AI-powered investigation summaries can improve. User experience could be enhanced through simplification of workflows. Better board-level cyber risk dashboards could provide easier visualization. Additionally, Anomali could work on simplifying the pricing structure. Although it excels in threat intelligence aggregation and operationalization, stronger GenAI capability, improved executive reporting, and a more intuitive workflow for analysts would further increase SOC efficiency and add more business value. Regarding Anomali's AI capabilities, governance and security are quite good. Anomali has incorporated AI and machine learning primarily to improve correlation and prioritization. These capabilities are valuable but could be more mature. The platform could achieve better threat correlation, prioritization, more anomaly detection, and allow AI to accelerate intelligence analysis while further improving quality and relevance. The accuracy and reliability of Anomali's AI output are fairly reasonable and good. The AI engine works well, but this capability could be improved. Better threat correlation with threat actors, certain indicators of compromise, malware, and campaigns is possible. Threat prioritization could increase, and alert noise could be reduced through further de-duplication. While reasonable, this is not the best available, and other products possibly have more AI maturity, such as Recorded Future and CrowdStrike Falcon.
GANESAN K - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Technical Engineer at Safezone Secure Solutions Private Limited
Automated threat hunting has reduced investigation time and now improves incident visibility
We have not tested in that manner because when comparing with the competition product CrowdStrike, Purple AI and CrowdStrike are pretty good and more or less equal in the way of responding to a query. On the technical side, I can compare Purple AI with CrowdStrike's threat intelligence. CrowdStrike was initially a breach investigation company and was in the Indian market well before SentinelOne, acquiring more significant ground. We have used Charlotte AI, which is provided by CrowdStrike, the direct competitor of SentinelOne. These two have key differences. Charlotte AI focuses more on IOAs and IOCs, whereas Purple AI helps us query the logs and hunt threats. As an improvement, if SentinelOne could focus on IOA similar to what CrowdStrike is giving, that would be a good point. They could feed information on IOA, such as based on attackers, what different attack groups are performing the attacks, and provide those insights. Compared to its competition, for doing DFIR (Digital Forensics and Incident Response), not only IOCs are needed but also IOAs. Information about the indication of the attacker, who is attacking, and the attacker group history would be better if Purple AI could incorporate that. We can build some queries and automated responses for any suspicious or malicious conditions. It would be better if there were workflows in place for giving alerts. The way alerts are handled could be improved because when compared to other competing products, I am able to handle the technique of the threat and categorize it based on severity. If it has a major impact on the environment, I can contain the system. I have numerous options to create various kinds of alerts.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which AI-SOC solutions are best for your needs.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
14%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
10%
Comms Service Provider
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise14
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Large Enterprise2
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Torq?
What has not worked as well as I hoped with Torq is related to product data management and storing data, although it ...
What is your primary use case for Torq?
My main use case for Torq is for managing IT services and providing faster response.
What advice do you have for others considering Torq?
I would rate Torq a 10 on a scale of 1 to 10. I chose this rating because customer service is excellent. I suggest to...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Anomali Enterprise?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that there are not many follow-ups, but once we interacted w...
What needs improvement with Anomali ThreatStream?
I can mention one point regarding improvements for Anomali, which is more enhanced reporting flexibility. The reporti...
What is your primary use case for Anomali ThreatStream?
I was using Anomali primarily for threat intelligence operations, security monitoring, and threat detection initiativ...
What needs improvement with Purple AI?
AI-assisted summary is good, but if we get it in the exact threat module where we investigate all the threats, it wou...
What is your primary use case for Purple AI?
The main use cases I use Purple AI for are building queries, alerts, and Star custom policies. Mostly I use Purple AI...
What advice do you have for others considering Purple AI?
I notice a difference in speed using Purple AI compared to legacy SIEMs such as Sumo Logic; it is fast, taking only a...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Match, Lens, ThreatStream, STAXX, Anomali Security Analytics, ThreatStream Next-Gen and Agentic SOC Platform
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Bank of England, First Energy, UBISOFT, Bank of Hope, Blackhawk Network
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Torq, Anvilogic, SentinelOne and others in AI-SOC. Updated: October 2026.
921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.