Anomali and Lumu are competitors in the cybersecurity industry, providing unique threat intelligence solutions. Lumu appears to have the upper hand due to its superior features, despite Anomali's competitive pricing and strong support.
Features: Anomali provides robust threat intelligence capabilities focusing on data analysis, integration with existing frameworks, and a highly adaptable API for programmatic handling of threats. Lumu offers real-time threat detection, continuous network monitoring, and simplified threat assessments.
Room for Improvement: Anomali could enhance its real-time detection and reduce alert fatigue. Lumu may benefit from expanded data sets and faster incident escalation processes. Both products can improve their integration with additional platforms and systems.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Anomali supports various IT environments with extensive deployment options and reliable customer service. Lumu offers a cloud-centric deployment model ensuring quick setup with notable responsiveness in customer service.
Pricing and ROI: Anomali is recognized for cost-effective setup and strong ROI driven by a broad suite of features. Lumu may require a higher initial investment but provides greater long-term ROI through proactive security measures and operational efficiencies.
They appreciate the rich telemetry data from the solution, as it provides in-depth threat identification.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks helps to reduce my total cost of ownership significantly.
In Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, most of the remediation is automated and the accuracy is quite good.
Analyst productivity has improved significantly, with hours saved because of automation and AI-driven work that Anomali performs.
Anomali provides us with a very cost-effective value compared to the market, and I would rate it ten out of ten for return on investment metrics.
There is a return on investment concerning time and effort saved by 40% after implementing Anomali.
It self-reports as saving 10 to 20 hours a week of engineer time.
The technical support from Palo Alto deserves a mark of ten because they reach out within an hour whenever assistance is needed.
There is no back and forth, and they know what we are asking for and come up with the best resolution for a solution.
If any of these services are missed, it becomes a problem in terms of support tickets, follow-up, or special configuration that needs to be done in the system.
They have strong onboarding and deployment assistance, provide a dedicated technical account manager for large customers, and engage in regular product updates and customer interaction.
The technical support at Anomali is excellent.
It doesn't seem very professional how they're handling support anymore.
It picks up on borderline issues that matter.
You can onboard 10,000 endpoints in just hours, which demonstrates the excellent scalability of this product.
Activating the newly purchased licenses is instantaneous, allowing installations without adjustments since it's cloud-based.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be expanded anytime by purchasing another license without any issues related to scalability.
The scalability is massive, allowing us to store millions of indicators.
I believe Anomali's scalability is good; whether it is an organization for ten people or one hundred thousand people, the job a threat intel platform has to do will be the same.
Anomali's scalability is impressive as a mature platform capable of processing large amounts of threat intelligence and indicators of compromise data.
Cortex remains fast and responsive, even with increasing data and alerts.
The thresholds we've seen on our firewall boxes at some instances reached 80% to 85%, but even at that level of utilization, we don't observe any latency or any issues reported with respect to accessing the application.
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks can be trusted completely.
From a reliability perspective, Anomali consistently injects threat feeds, works on automation, performs reliable API integrations, and supports enterprise scale globally.
For example, while Microsoft allows ample time for users to adapt to deprecated features, Anomali only gave us three weeks before switching, so they need to be more cognizant of customer use cases from their engineering side.
The good thing is that they have a health check page, and if any issues arise, they notify us.
Stability has been excellent.
Improving reporting and dashboard customization, along with the addition of real-time and exportable reports, would help SOC teams greatly.
The inclusion of this feature would allow the application of DLP policies alongside antivirus policies via a single agent and console, making it more competitive as other OEMs often offer DLP solutions as part of their antivirus products.
If the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better.
Combining all aliases into a coherent solution would be beneficial, as we had to review each individual source ourselves.
Anomali should increase their capability to fetch details from various dark web solutions where threat actors post compromised credentials.
Anomali's ability to correlate and integrate different Threat Intel platforms, such as Mandiant and PolySwarm, is another valuable feature, removing duplicacy and enabling the application of specific IOCs across various security controls.
Having some sort of certification or training, along with more periodic webinars might be helpful.
The pricing on SentinelOne is far more reasonable and cheaper than Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
I would say it is definitely not a cheap product, considering how mature it is and how scalable all Palo Alto products are together.
Compared to CrowdStrike, which is very costly, and SentinelOne, which is also very costly, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is a medium cost-efficient solution.
Pricing and licensing are good, but the costs for purchasing threat feeds are somewhat complicated and a bit on the higher side.
My experience with Anomali's pricing is that it is higher compared to other open-source alternatives.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that there are not many follow-ups, but once we interacted with the product team or the leadership of Anomali, they managed a lot with us, and it all paid off to reach a conclusion that we would continue with this product.
In our environment, it costs approximately 1200 a month.
It incorporates AI for normal behavior detection, distinguishing unusual operations.
The product provides automation responses in case of a threat attack, severity assessments, centralized manageability, and comprehensive compliance features, resulting in reduced costs.
It includes machine learning to easily analyze data and detect complex threats across endpoints, networks, or clouds.
Regarding integration, Anomali has capabilities to integrate with different downstream applications such as Palo Alto, allowing us to create playbooks to block domains, URLs, or IPs directly within the firewall.
Correlating IOCs with the telemetry data we are ingesting from our data sources allows us to pull monthly reports identifying how many assets and users interacted with malicious content, giving insight into whether communications failed or users accessed restricted content, providing complete visibility of the IOCs traveling throughout our environment.
It aggregates intelligence from hundreds of sources, automatically de-duplicates, applies risk scoring, applies context, and reduces much manual effort.
It provides peace of mind knowing that any device on our network, whether it is our own, BYOD device, or an unauthorized device, is being tracked and analyzed at multiple levels.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks | 4.6% |
| Anomali | 2.5% |
| Lumu | 1.2% |
| Other | 91.7% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 46 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 52 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 14 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.
Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.
What are the key features of Cortex XDR?Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.
Anomali delivers user-friendly cyber threat intelligence, offering concise insights with robust capabilities for evolving scenarios.
Anomali offers a powerful platform for cyber threat intelligence, allowing organizations to efficiently stream and analyze threat feeds. It excels in threat modeling, prioritizing intelligence, and supporting large-scale automation through its API, fostering a proactive security approach.
What are Anomali's Key Features?Anomali serves as a crucial tool for threat intelligence in industries ranging from finance to healthcare. Organizations stream threat feeds into Anomali to correlate and aggregate data, enhancing security measures and facilitating thorough threat investigations. Its adaptability makes it suitable across different sectors.
Lumu detects and validates network compromises by analyzing metadata like DNS, NetFlow, and proxy logs. It provides real-time indicators and context to enhance detection, improve threat visibility, and reduce investigation time.
Lumu offers organizations a streamlined solution to identify network compromises through comprehensive metadata analysis, including DNS, NetFlow, and proxy logs. By providing real-time compromise indicators alongside contextual information, Lumu elevates threat visibility and shortens investigation durations. Its simple interface and integration flexibility with platforms, alongside automated incident responses, highlight its value. While users appreciate limited false positives, ease of use, and the context provided, enhancements in SIEM and XDR integration, asset context enrichment, and reporting are areas users would like to see further developed.
What features define Lumu?Organizations use Lumu to monitor outbound traffic, detect compromised endpoints, log firewall activities, and enable active threat blocking. Its integration ease via API supports threat detection across LAN and Wi-Fi, monitoring email traffic, and acting as a managed SOC for security event coordination. Companies appreciate Lumu's adaptability in hybrid environments and its ability to efficiently locate and analyze threats within network metadata, ensuring quick deployment and extendibility across external platforms.
We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.