Amazon Route 53 vs G-Core Labs CDN comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and Gcore are both solutions in the Managed DNS category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8, while Gcore is ranked #10 with an average rating of 9.0. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 6.0% mindshare in MDP, compared to Gcore’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Gcore users who would recommend it.

Amazon Route 53

Read 33 Amazon Route 53 reviews

5,878 Views
4,276 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

G-Core Labs CDN

Read 4 G-Core Labs CDN reviews

654 Views
36 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon Route 53

G-Core Labs CDN

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 4, 2024

Amazon Route 53 and G-Core Labs CDN are key competitors in domain and content delivery services. Data suggests G-Core Labs CDN offers superior features, although Amazon Route 53 presents more competitive pricing and integration benefits.

Features: Amazon Route 53's strengths lie in its robust DNS management, seamless AWS integration, and flexible DNS failover, making it particularly favorable for AWS users. G-Core Labs CDN shines with its global edge network, comprehensive security features, and advanced traffic management, appealing to a diverse range of content delivery needs.

Room for Improvement: Amazon Route 53 could enhance its global reach, simplify its interface, and improve customer support outside the AWS ecosystem. G-Core Labs CDN may benefit from optimizing streaming services, reducing complexity in initial setup, and offering more competitive pricing tiers.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon Route 53 is noted for its easy deployment and integration within AWS, delivering a unified management experience for AWS users. Conversely, G-Core Labs provides a straightforward deployment process with dedicated customer support, making it accessible and reliable for CDN-oriented tasks.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon Route 53 offers attractive pricing for AWS customers, with low initial costs aligning with existing investments. G-Core Labs CDN, while higher in initial expense, provides excellent ROI through superior performance and content delivery efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon Route 53 vs. G-Core Labs CDN Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Route 53 vs. G-Core Labs CDN

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon Route 53

Ranking in Managed DNS

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

G-Core Labs CDN

Ranking in Managed DNS

10th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CDN (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Managed DNS category, the mindshare of Amazon Route 53 is 6.0%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of G-Core Labs CDN is 0.5%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed DNS

Featured Reviews

ArunDhwaj

Technical Owner at Harman International

Managed security and horizontal scaling enhance application performance

We are using Route 53 for application security. We are also using it for computing, EC2, and setting up our server plus a complete infrastructure Route 53 helps us manage security without manually handling it. We can maintain availability and horizontal scaling effectively. One of the best…

Read full review

Edgar Mart

Senior Technical Support Engineer at HayPost CJSC

Works without interruption, scales well, and has perfect uptime

Our website works without interruption almost until late at night, as many students have the opportunity to study in the evening. Most of all, we appreciate the stable and fast work of g-core. Uptime is always perfect. With such a volume of data as we have, failures can occur from time to time. The support solves everything in the shortest possible time. I love that the guys are constantly trying to improve the service. Our online school is expanding every year, and there are no problems that our provider can’t solve. They also have the opportunity to negotiate individual conditions for complex sites.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Amazon Route 53 is a DNS resolution service that helps you to map your hostname to another hostname."

"Amazon's customer support is very good with a quick response time."

"One of the best advantages is managed security."

"The solution is stable."

"The most valuable features of the solution are the DNS, routing, and traffic features."

"Amazon Route 53 is excellent for those dealing with traffic management and routing services."

"Amazon Route 53 is easy to manage and seamlessly integrates with other AWS services."

"The solution offers you the flexibility to control configuration rules."

More Amazon Route 53 pros

"The support is amazing! They solve the issues on the fly."

"Since transitioning to G-Core, our site has started working much faster, and freezes have stopped. Users are staying on the site longer and visiting more sections. We increased the number of customers by 30 percent in the past six months. This is partially attributable to G-Core services."

"Uptime is always perfect."

"The CDN interface is intuitive and user-friendly, and there are no intrusive ads or upselling additional services. Everything is self-contained, and it's a convenient CDN overall. We also loved that they provided a free trial period. They always seem to do what's best for the consumer and the internet."

Cons

"The number of domain types available on AWS, such as the .br domain for Brazil, should be expanded."

"Route 53 supports DNSSEC, and it may not be available for all domain types or configurations. It can become expensive as usage scales, especially with advanced features and high query volumes. Slower response time with lower-tier support plan."

"There is a need for technical knowledge to use Amazon Route 53 effectively."

"The limitations of the tool revolve around the area of monitoring location, especially since the performance and selection options offered by the product are limited."

"Streamlining and optimizing processes related to Procter, VPN workflows, and other subjects based on specific needs would allow for continual improvement and adaptation to the evolving requirements of the system."

"It may not always be easy to integrate with on-premise infrastructure, especially with the complexity of the resolver and other factors involved. Improvements could be made to enhance the ability to integrate seamlessly."

"With Amazon Route 53, finding what you want is so much more difficult, making it an area where improvements are required."

"Route 53 would be better if it had the ability to handle multiple requests at the same time because we have a lot of users. I would like that to be optimized in the next version."

More Amazon Route 53 cons

"I would like to have one optimized report that we could use for our own needs."

"There are some nuances in the tariff configurations that we found confusing. We would like more flexibility in this area."

"It would be great if there were a section on the provider's website that shows a set of services for a particular business. It would be helpful to have some kind of checklist of services that are suitable for your blog, which are required, and which can be set up later."

"Once in the past six months, we got a "site is unavailable" error for a maximum of 20 minutes."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the product is perfectly fine in my opinion."

"The pricing depends on usage and is moderate."

"Amazon Route 53 is not an expensive solution."

"The price of Amazon Route 53 is reasonable."

"We pay per use."

"Amazon Route 53 is an expensive solution."

"The price of the solution could be a little bit lower compared to Google DNS, which has more features than Amazon."

"It can be expensive compared to some other providers."

More Amazon Route 53 pricing and cost advice

"The price of G-Core Labs CDN is very reasonable in comparison with other companies. We've done a lot of research into CDN providers, and G-Core offers the best service for the lowest cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed DNS solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Educational Organization

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

26%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Media Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Azure DNS or Amazon Route 53?

Azure DNS is a hosting service of DNS domains. It has excellent operating time and performance, resulting in fast resolution. We like the ability to view everything in the Azure portal - this makes...

See all answers

What do you like most about Amazon Route 53?

The most valuable features of the solution are the DNS, routing, and traffic features.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon Route 53?

Amazon Route 53 should focus on timeliness and work towards better accuracy. They need to ensure that the threats reported on are actual threats, as the software might miss catching them timely.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for G-Core Labs CDN?

Compared to other solutions currently available on the market, the price of G-Core Labs CDN is very reasonable. G-Core CDN has 4 pricing editions: a free model, START 1.5TB, PRO 5TB, and a custom o...

See all answers

What do you like most about G-Core Labs CDN?

Uptime is always perfect.

See all answers

What needs improvement with G-Core Labs CDN?

We are closely monitoring the improvements in statistics on using the CDN resource. Now it can be viewed by different parameters: geography, individual users, devices, and more. We are waiting for ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure DNS vs Amazon Route 53

Compared 60% of the time

Cloudflare vs Amazon Route 53

Compared 19% of the time

Google Cloud DNS vs Amazon Route 53

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs Amazon Route 53

Compared 4% of the time

IBM NS1 Connect vs Amazon Route 53

Compared 4% of the time

More Amazon Route 53 Competitors

Cloudflare vs G-Core Labs CDN

Compared 81% of the time

Quad9 vs G-Core Labs CDN

Compared 10% of the time

Fastly vs G-Core Labs CDN

Compared 8% of the time

More G-Core Labs CDN Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Route 53

June 2025

Download Amazon Route 53 product report

Buyer's Guide

CDN

June 2025

Download G-Core Labs CDN product report

Also Known As

Route 53

No data available

Overview

Amazon Route 53 is a highly available and scalable cloud Domain Name System (DNS) web service. It is designed to give developers and businesses an extremely reliable and cost effective way to route end users to Internet applications by translating names like www.example.com into the numeric IP addresses like 192.0.2.1 that computers use to connect to each other. Amazon Route 53 is fully compliant with IPv6 as well.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Powerful edge and cloud solutions for media business and the entertainment industry

Gcore

Sample Customers

Hess, Expedia, Kelloggs, Philips, HyperTrack

avast, TEDx, Nanobit, Group Wagner, Momento

Buyer's Guide

Amazon Route 53 vs. G-Core Labs CDN

June 2025

Free Report: Amazon Route 53 vs. G-Core Labs CDN

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Route 53 vs. G-Core Labs CDN and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon Route 53 vs. G-Core Labs CDN report.

See our list of best Managed DNS vendors.

We monitor all Managed DNS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.