Amazon EMR vs SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse comparison

"The solution is pretty simple to set up."

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"In Amazon EMR it is easy to rebuild anything, easy to upgrade and has good fault tolerance."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"Amazon EMR has multiple connectors that can connect to various data sources."

"The project management is very streamlined."

"I rate Amazon EMR as ten out of ten."

"It allows users to access the data through a web interface."

"The security and audit procedures are the most valuable features."

"It provides us with proof of data, we can centralize all of the information, check it, and then provide the information to our users."

"A robust and efficient product."

"It's an excellent over-all tool for managers to analyze their business."

"Data modeling is a valuable feature."

"Transformation is a valuable feature of SAP NetWeaver. I can transform the data as per my needs or my client's needs. For example, flat tables can be transformed with respect to our requirements to combine multiple modules into one single table, and we can derive analytics."

"It is a robust system."

"There were times where they would release new versions and it seemed to end up breaking old versions, which is very strange."

"As people are shifting from legacy solutions to other technologies, Amazon EMR needs to add more features that give more flexibility in managing user data."

"Spark jobs take longer on Amazon EMR compared to previous experiences."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"There is room for improvement with respect to retries, handling the volume of data on S3 buckets, cluster provisioning, scaling, termination, security, and integration between services like S3, Glue, Lake Formation, and DynamoDB."

"We don't have much control. If we have multiple users, if they want to scale up, the cost will go and increase and we don't know how we can restrict that price part."

"The most complicated thing is configuring to the cluster and ensure it's running correctly."

"There is room for improvement in pricing."

"The program is difficult to learn to use"

"There are performance issues in terms of scalability and availability."

"I think more integration with other applications would be perfect."

"The product could provide more features."

"Connectors are complex, and it is difficult to understand or know which connector should be used. For instance, if I want to connect APIs, I will not be able to do it directly. I would have to go to the portal integration to get the data. Therefore, having simplified connectors will make things much easier."

"It is difficult when your native language is not English. It is difficult for us to explain our issue and also difficult for the technical team to explain a resolution to us."

"Design and modeling could be simplified."

"You don't need to pay for licensing on a yearly or monthly basis, you only pay for what you use, in terms of underlying instances."

"Amazon EMR is not very expensive."

"The cost of Amazon EMR is very high."

"There is a small fee for the EMR system, but major cost components are the underlying infrastructure resources which we actually use."

"The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. It can be expensive since it's a managed service, and if you are not careful, you can run into unexpected charges. You can make a mistake that costs you tens of thousands of dollars. That's happened to us twice, so I'm sensitive to it. We're still trying to work on that. Our smallest client probably spends a hundred thousand dollars yearly on licensing, while our largest is well over a million."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"All SAP products are expensive."

"The licensing cost is high for SAP NetWeaver compared to that for other products."

"Pricing is based on the number of user IDs and tyhe user ID works across a suite of products."