Amazon EMR vs SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse comparison

"The initial setup is straightforward."

"The solution is scalable."

"When we grade big jobs from on-prem to the cloud, we do it in EMR with Spark."

"The ability to resize the cluster is what really makes it stand out over other Hadoop and big data solutions."

"The initial setup is pretty straightforward."

"It has a variety of options and support systems."

"It allows users to access the data through a web interface."

"I rate Amazon EMR as ten out of ten."

"It's an excellent over-all tool for managers to analyze their business."

"Transformation is a valuable feature of SAP NetWeaver. I can transform the data as per my needs or my client's needs. For example, flat tables can be transformed with respect to our requirements to combine multiple modules into one single table, and we can derive analytics."

"Data modeling is a valuable feature."

"A robust and efficient product."

"It provides us with proof of data, we can centralize all of the information, check it, and then provide the information to our users."

"The security and audit procedures are the most valuable features."

"It is a robust system."

"Modules and strategies should be better handled and notified early in advance."

"The solution can become expensive if you are not careful."

"Spark jobs take longer on Amazon EMR compared to previous experiences."

"The problem for us is it starts very slow."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"We don't have much control. If we have multiple users, if they want to scale up, the cost will go and increase and we don't know how we can restrict that price part."

"The product must add some of the latest technologies to provide more flexibility to the users."

"As people are shifting from legacy solutions to other technologies, Amazon EMR needs to add more features that give more flexibility in managing user data."

"There are performance issues in terms of scalability and availability."

"It is difficult when your native language is not English. It is difficult for us to explain our issue and also difficult for the technical team to explain a resolution to us."

"I think more integration with other applications would be perfect."

"The product could provide more features."

"The program is difficult to learn to use"

"Connectors are complex, and it is difficult to understand or know which connector should be used. For instance, if I want to connect APIs, I will not be able to do it directly. I would have to go to the portal integration to get the data. Therefore, having simplified connectors will make things much easier."

"Design and modeling could be simplified."

"You don't need to pay for licensing on a yearly or monthly basis, you only pay for what you use, in terms of underlying instances."

"There is no need to pay extra for third-party software."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten. It can be expensive since it's a managed service, and if you are not careful, you can run into unexpected charges. You can make a mistake that costs you tens of thousands of dollars. That's happened to us twice, so I'm sensitive to it. We're still trying to work on that. Our smallest client probably spends a hundred thousand dollars yearly on licensing, while our largest is well over a million."

"The product is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"There is a small fee for the EMR system, but major cost components are the underlying infrastructure resources which we actually use."

"The cost of Amazon EMR is very high."

"Amazon EMR is not very expensive."

"Amazon EMR's price is reasonable."

"The licensing cost is high for SAP NetWeaver compared to that for other products."

"Pricing is based on the number of user IDs and tyhe user ID works across a suite of products."

"All SAP products are expensive."