Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and NetApp are both solutions in the Cloud Storage category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #11 with an average rating of 7.8, while NetApp is ranked #19. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 3.2% mindshare in CS, compared to NetApp’s 2.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Read 18 Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) reviews

8,178 Views
1,717 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Read 3 NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud reviews

1,952 Views
1,074 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Amazon EFS and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud cater to different user needs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service edges out due to its feature-rich package, despite Amazon EFS being appreciated for pricing.

Features: Amazon EFS users value its scalability and integration with AWS services. Additional features include automatic capacity adjustments and seamless data transfers. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service users praise its performance and support for multiple protocols. Other notable features are advanced data management tools and robust security options.

Room for Improvement: Amazon EFS users wish for improved performance and cross-region capabilities. They also seek better data redundancy options. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service users seek better scalability and reduced latency. Suggestions include more intuitive user interfaces and enhanced automation features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon EFS is praised for straightforward deployment but has criticisms for slow customer support. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service users find deployment challenging but commend the prompt and helpful support. NetApp’s customer service is more favorably reviewed.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon EFS is considered cost-effective with satisfactory ROI. Pricing starts at $0.08 per GB-month for standard storage. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service is seen as pricey but features justify the expense, with prices starting around $0.20 per GB per month. NetApp offers better ROI due to its comprehensive capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,402 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon EFS (Elastic File Sy...

Ranking in Cloud Storage

11th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

File and Object Storage (14th)

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Ranking in Cloud Storage

19th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (24th), Public Cloud Storage Services (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Storage category, the mindshare of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is 3.2%, down from 6.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is 2.2%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Storage Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)	3.2%
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud	2.2%
Other	94.6%

Cloud Storage

Featured Reviews

reviewer2784675

Sr. Technical Account Manager at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Serverless file storage has simplified multi-tenant Linux workloads and supports effortless growth

When I started working with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), I faced a few issues. One issue was around the number of IOPS limitation. Initially, the number of IOPS that could be performed on the Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) file system was quite low. Later on, it has been increased, and now I believe it is at a level where only very specific workloads might not perform optimally, but otherwise everything should work smoothly. By the time I was there, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) was supporting NFS version 4.1, not 4.2. Currently, it is supported up to NFS 4.1. A notable limitation of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is that it does not support Windows. If your workload is running on a Linux operating system and you do not want to manage it or even understand NFS at all, you should still be able to use it fairly quickly. There are scenarios where Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) might not work effectively. For example, database-type workloads do not run properly on Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) because at the end of the day, it is a network file system and requests must travel from one place to another and then return. This process takes time, so if you are running a database-type workload, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) might not be the right approach, and you would need to look elsewhere.

Read full review

Colin Constable

Co-Founder at Atsign

Enables us to fine-tune storage and capacity on the fly as our needs grow or shrink over time

NetApp delivers High Availability. It's critical to our work. That was the main driver for using NetApp. We have a highly resilient service and if you have a highly resilient service, you are only as resilient as the least resilient part of your infrastructure. That's what we were having trouble with our file system before. It was becoming troublesome, so we needed to find something that was much more highly resilient so that's why we moved to NetApp. The complexity of moving large numbers of files to the cloud depends on what you're trying to do. But for us, it was really simple. I imagine for large enterprise customers it is probably pretty tricky. They're probably on all different technologies inside a large corporation and they may or may not have very large pipes going to them. So if you're in a data center to the cloud then it's going to be easy, but if you have hundreds of branches like if you're a bank and have lots of branch banks, they might have very small pipes out to the internet. It might take forever. In our use case everything's brand new files, so it was pretty trivial. We didn't migrate to the cloud, we were already on the cloud, so it was a nonissue for us. NetApp enables us to share data across VMs. It actually reduced the amount of data storage we need. We were having to have storage attached to each VM. And now we can aggregate that storage across multiple VMs, so that actually gave us a net reduction, which was a good thing. We switched from using block storage to file storage to share data between our VMs. It made it easier, frankly but I worry about the scalability in the future. For the moment it made life easier. We were using block and then we moved back to file with NetApp.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The platform is highly scalable."

"There are huge money savings, as we can save more than half of our costs."

"Amazon EFS is extremely stable, as it is managed by AWS."

"I appreciate Amazon's extensive range of services, which makes it a favorable choice."

"We need our storage to expand based on demand but storage is a bit costly, so we start with a smaller amount and, as we grow, we use EFS on demand and it manages our costs."

"Elastic File Systems allow me to share data, provision, and manage capacity and performance in AWS."

"The most beneficial feature of the product for data storage stems from the fact that it serves as a shared file storage."

"The automatic scaling functionality has helped manage fluctuating workloads because when we have 10 gigs of data and a customer needs to put even 10 times the data, no action is required as it will grow automatically."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) pros

"Overall, they have very impressive technologies."

"In terms of its storage snapshot efficiencies, the service is highly efficient. We are only doing things in small batches right now because we have not converted all of the data, but we have tested them in the Google Cloud and they work efficiently."

"Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero. I was personally running all the infrastructure for the company. Now that we've moved to NetApp, I don't have to worry about making sure it's up and running. It's made my life personally much better."

"Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero."

"High availability is very important to us because we have a production environment. High availability is the highest priority for us to continue keeping our systems running."

"It is a good service for high availability that is very easy to configure."

Cons

"I don't have notes on improvements."

"A notable limitation of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is that it does not support Windows."

"The user activity needs to be more connected and not required to connect to a PC or a device."

"There are challenges related to AWS, such as ensuring proper security measures with IMS code and encryption."

"When we faced some issues, the support team took a lot of time to resolve them."

"The initial setup requires prior experience and technical skills."

"Initially, the cost of storage seems to be small, but customer cost for the storage is really very high and this doesn't work for India."

"It should be simplified. There are people who don't have cloud experience. It should be storage that we are able to just connect to."

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) cons

"The user interface has room for improvement."

"I would like for the sales team to get in contact more often and let me know what I should be doing next, what we should be doing about new features. So it would be nice if I heard a little bit more from him. From a technology perspective, I have no complaints."

"It would help if they increased the area in which they employ artificial intelligence, by starting to do assessments on the environments, to project those. They're not using any AI tools, currently, on the administrative side."

"The user interface has room for improvement. We would like this service to be more integrated with Azure, which is very easy to manage and use. It was easy to create volumes and add capacity pools in Azure, but in Google Cloud, we can only create separate volumes. We need more management or configuration options in the user interface."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The main challenge with EFS is its cost, which is slightly higher compared to EBS or S3. For one GB or ten GB of data, S3 is much cheaper. EFS could cost around $30 to $50 per month for similar usage."

"The product's price depends on the services and the size and capacity at which it is used in a business environment."

"I would rate the pricing 7 out of 10."

"It has flexible pricing. You are charged based on your storage."

"The solution's price is mid-ranged."

"The product charges are based on the amount of data stored."

"Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) offers a pay-as-you-go model, so whenever you use its services, you need to pay."

"We don't need so much space, and there is no option to pay as we go or use just what we need. Also, the only way to increase performance is by increasing the level of the service."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,402 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?

Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?

We don't need to purchase it; we are just using it and paying Amazon as per the utilization. We make direct payments to Amazon based on our usage.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 64% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 3% of the time

Red Hat Ceph Storage vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 3% of the time

Dell PowerScale vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 3% of the time

Zadara vs Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

Compared 1% of the time

More Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) Competitors

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 19% of the time

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Database Backup Service vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

Microsoft Azure Object Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)

August 2026

Download Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

July 2026

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud report

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

CVS for Google Cloud, NetApp CVS for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for GCP, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for GCP

Overview

Amazon EFS provides elastic file storage in the cloud, offering unlimited storage and seamless integration with AWS services for dynamic workloads.

Amazon EFS serves as a scalable, shareable file storage across Linux servers, seamlessly integrating with AWS for data-intensive applications. Its auto-scaling capability handles shifting data demands in real time, ensuring cost-effective storage management. Offering high availability and support for NFS version 4, Amazon EFS optimizes performance and data integrity for cloud and serverless environments. While its strengths lie in scalability and Linux support, further enhancements in cost transparency, Windows compatibility, and deployment simplicity can broaden its applicability.

What are the key features of Amazon EFS?

Flexible Scaling: Automatically adjusts storage capacity to meet dynamic workload demands.
Usage-based Pricing: Only charges for storage used, optimizing cost efficiency.
Integration with AWS: Seamlessly connects with services like EC2 for enhanced application support.
Auto-scaling: Efficiently allocates resources for fluctuating data needs.
Shared Access: Facilitates collaborative data use across various applications.

What benefits should users expect from Amazon EFS reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlined configuration and easy scaling of resources.
Cost Management: Reduced storage expenses through usage-based pricing.
Reliable Performance: Consistent data availability and stable system operations.
Improved Data Management: Simplified processes for handling extensive datasets.
Integration Capabilities: Smooth interoperability with AWS services enhances functionality.

Amazon EFS is widely implemented in industries needing robust cloud-based storage solutions, facilitating scalable storage for applications like web serving, content management, and data analytics. Its compatibility with EC2 and Linux optimizes resource management, supporting complex access needs and enhancing operational efficiency in technology-focused sectors.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud provides a managed, high-performance storage solution designed for enterprise workloads and complex data environments, ensuring seamless integration with Google Cloud.

It offers enterprises an efficient way to manage storage needs in Google Cloud, with features focused on high performance, ease of use, and robust data management. This service facilitates quick deployment, reliability, and data protection, allowing organizations to focus on operational efficiency without the complexities of traditional infrastructure.

What are the most important features?

High Performance: Delivers consistent, scalable performance for demanding applications.
Ease of Use: Simplified management and deployment reduce administrative overhead.
Data Protection: Includes built-in snapshots and replication for data integrity and disaster recovery.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Google Cloud services for streamlined workflows.
Scalability: Easily scales with business growth, providing storage on demand.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Cost Efficiency: Optimizes storage costs with automated tiering and flexible pricing models.
Enhanced Productivity: Reduces time spent on storage management, allowing teams to focus on core tasks.
Reliability: Provides a dependable infrastructure with high uptime and data availability.
Agility: Enables rapid adaptation to changing business needs with quick scalability.

In industries like finance and healthcare, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is implemented to ensure secure data handling and regulatory compliance. Its capabilities in data protection and rapid scaling are particularly valuable in these sectors, where data integrity and fast access are priorities.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Arcesium, Atlassian, Seeking Alpha, Zend

Atos, Bandwidth, Wuxi NextCode

Buyer's Guide

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

August 2026

Free Report: Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,402 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud report.

See our list of best Cloud Storage vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.