Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Amazon Web Services (AWS) and NetApp are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.2, while NetApp is ranked #17. Amazon Web Services (AWS) holds a 14.0% mindshare in PCSS, compared to NetApp’s 3.8% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp users who would recommend it.

Amazon S3

Read 86 Amazon S3 reviews

12,025 Views
11,785 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Read 3 NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud reviews

2,632 Views
1,500 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Amazon S3

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Amazon S3 and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud compete in the cloud storage solutions category. Amazon S3 has the upper hand in integration options while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service is known for its performance and data management capabilities.

Features: Amazon S3 offers extensive integration with various AWS services, cross-replication, and intelligent tiering. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service provides high performance, supports multiprotocol data access, and excels in specialized performance and data management.

Room for Improvement: Amazon S3 could enhance its performance and consistency in data retrieval times and improve response times of their customer service. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service could benefit from better support for certain Google Cloud Platform services, enhanced documentation, and improved integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Amazon S3 offers straightforward deployment, strong community support, and comprehensive documentation. Its customer service is efficient but response times could be improved. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service features user-friendly deployment, responsive customer service, and expert guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Amazon S3 provides flexible pricing models that are cost-effective for large-scale storage needs, though there are concerns about unpredictable costs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service has higher initial costs but offers good ROI due to its enhanced performance and reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed Amazon S3 vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Amazon S3

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

17th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Migration (24th), Cloud Storage (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Amazon S3 is 14.0%, up from 13.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is 3.8%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Amazon S3	14.0%
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud	3.8%
Other	82.2%

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

Donny Trijatmiko

Dev Ops Engineer at MyRobin.ID

Effective storage management has supported reliable file archiving and secure data access

I have found Amazon S3 very useful and it has helped me considerably. I appreciate that Amazon S3 can provide a state lock when using Terraform, and it is widely used for storing objects. I assess Amazon S3's encryption options positively, as I always enable encryption. It is beneficial because it provides default encryption from server-side encryption at the bucket level. In my data management strategy using Amazon S3, I store data that I can return to an earlier state by using versioning on the bucket. For my company, the impact of Amazon S3's availability and durability statistics is very good because, to my knowledge, it experiences fewer outages.

Read full review

Colin Constable

Co-Founder at Atsign

Enables us to fine-tune storage and capacity on the fly as our needs grow or shrink over time

NetApp delivers High Availability. It's critical to our work. That was the main driver for using NetApp. We have a highly resilient service and if you have a highly resilient service, you are only as resilient as the least resilient part of your infrastructure. That's what we were having trouble with our file system before. It was becoming troublesome, so we needed to find something that was much more highly resilient so that's why we moved to NetApp. The complexity of moving large numbers of files to the cloud depends on what you're trying to do. But for us, it was really simple. I imagine for large enterprise customers it is probably pretty tricky. They're probably on all different technologies inside a large corporation and they may or may not have very large pipes going to them. So if you're in a data center to the cloud then it's going to be easy, but if you have hundreds of branches like if you're a bank and have lots of branch banks, they might have very small pipes out to the internet. It might take forever. In our use case everything's brand new files, so it was pretty trivial. We didn't migrate to the cloud, we were already on the cloud, so it was a nonissue for us. NetApp enables us to share data across VMs. It actually reduced the amount of data storage we need. We were having to have storage attached to each VM. And now we can aggregate that storage across multiple VMs, so that actually gave us a net reduction, which was a good thing. We switched from using block storage to file storage to share data between our VMs. It made it easier, frankly but I worry about the scalability in the future. For the moment it made life easier. We were using block and then we moved back to file with NetApp.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main aspect we like is that it's been easy to use."

"The most valuable features of Amazon S3 are compatibility and reliability."

"We can easily connect to the AWS resources."

"AWS has a really good cloud implementation."

"Amazon S3 is easily accessible, fast and effective. Its performance is good."

"We find the archival capabilities of this solution quite valuable, because we can have set policies of exactly when, and what to archive."

"Not many products in the market beat the solution in terms of quality or price."

"One of the benefits is being a global service, so it can be accessed from anywhere."

More Amazon S3 pros

"In terms of its storage snapshot efficiencies, the service is highly efficient. We are only doing things in small batches right now because we have not converted all of the data, but we have tested them in the Google Cloud and they work efficiently."

"Overall, they have very impressive technologies."

"It is a good service for high availability that is very easy to configure."

"Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero."

"High availability is very important to us because we have a production environment. High availability is the highest priority for us to continue keeping our systems running."

"Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero. I was personally running all the infrastructure for the company. Now that we've moved to NetApp, I don't have to worry about making sure it's up and running. It's made my life personally much better."

Cons

"I didn't find the user interface very friendly."

"The main pain point that I have faced is the need for faster restore times from Glacier tiers, which could definitely be improved."

"Amazon S3 could improve some of the features, such as indexing, or we should have more information about all the data stored in a single place. This way we can see what data resides where instead of going in different buckets, file locations manually, or searching. An index would be nice, allowing us to directly go to a location to use the date."

"However, this sign is not compliant with internet regulations."

"I would like there to be more support without needing to use Transfer Family."

"It is expensive for storing."

"If a certain resource is left unchecked, you can easily use a lot of it and drive up costs."

"I would also like S3 to have the ability to do dynamic websites without the need to do reconfigurations outside of S3. You should be able to switch on dynamic websites in S3, and then it works. I shouldn't need to go elsewhere within Amazon Web Services to get a dynamic website to work."

More Amazon S3 cons

"The user interface has room for improvement. We would like this service to be more integrated with Azure, which is very easy to manage and use. It was easy to create volumes and add capacity pools in Azure, but in Google Cloud, we can only create separate volumes. We need more management or configuration options in the user interface."

"The user interface has room for improvement."

"I would like for the sales team to get in contact more often and let me know what I should be doing next, what we should be doing about new features. So it would be nice if I heard a little bit more from him. From a technology perspective, I have no complaints."

"It would help if they increased the area in which they employ artificial intelligence, by starting to do assessments on the environments, to project those. They're not using any AI tools, currently, on the administrative side."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of Amazon S3 is competitive with other solutions."

"The pricing depends on your region and is reasonable."

"The cost of storage is cheap. However, the cost to have a better interface can get expensive. We are using Athena for this purpose and if we did some heavy queries the cost will start adding up. When the Athena query is running, it will scan the bucket and they charge for how many GBs we are going to scan. The function of scanning has a lot of costs attached to it, this is a negative point."

"The pricing can be improved."

"This solution has reasonable pricing and a low cost."

"The solution is very inexpensive at 50 cents per gigabyte, per month."

"Not many products in the market beat the solution in terms of quality or price."

"The price of Amazon S3 could be less expensive."

More Amazon S3 pricing and cost advice

"We don't need so much space, and there is no option to pay as we go or use just what we need. Also, the only way to increase performance is by increasing the level of the service."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

10%

Construction Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Comms Service Provider

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	34
Midsize Enterprise	18
Large Enterprise	39

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon S3?

Since using Amazon S3, storage costs have reduced by around 35% to 40% through lifecycle tiering, data availability improved to 99.9% which minimizes downtime, ETL processing time decreased by appr...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Amazon S3?

I would appreciate Amazon expanding the available documentation to keep it as modern and up-to-date as possible.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Amazon S3?

I use Amazon S3 for storing images, uploading files like PDFs or PNGs, and other documents and images. I use Amazon S3's lifecycle management features for changing storage classes when the data nee...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Google Cloud Storage vs Amazon S3

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Amazon S3

Compared 7% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs Amazon S3

Compared 7% of the time

Google Cloud Storage Nearline vs Amazon S3

Compared 7% of the time

More Amazon S3 Competitors

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle Database Backup Service vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3

November 2026

Download Amazon S3 product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

October 2026

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud report

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud product report

Also Known As

S3, Simple Storage Service

CVS for Google Cloud, NetApp CVS for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for GCP, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for GCP

Overview

Amazon S3 is designed for large-scale data storage needs, offering high availability and easy integration with AWS services for users of all sizes. It provides a secure, scalable environment with features that support efficient resource management and cost-effective cloud storage solutions.

Amazon S3 offers a reliable platform with robust security measures and scalable infrastructure, making it ideal for businesses looking to manage and store large datasets. Its seamless integration with AWS expedites cloud operations while lifecycle management and versioning aid in optimizing costs by facilitating efficient data handling. The pay-as-you-go pricing model attracts users by offering budget flexibility while ensuring superior performance and durability. Multi-zone replication and automation reinforce data safety and streamline accessibility across regions. These factors contribute to S3's suitability for a diverse range of industrial applications, from web hosting to analytics.

What are the key features of Amazon S3?

High Availability: Equipped with a global infrastructure to ensure data is accessible around the clock.
Scalability: Easily scales up or down to accommodate fluctuating data storage needs.
Robust Security: Offers encryption options and strong access controls to safeguard data.
Integration with AWS: Simplifies operations by working smoothly with other AWS services.
Lifecycle Management: Enables automatic transition of data to cost-effective storage tiers.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Benefits from pay-as-you-go pricing, reducing financial barriers.
Performance: Provides reliable data availability and quick access.
Durability: Ensures long-term data retention with minimal risk of loss.
Disaster Recovery: Facilitates replication strategies enhancing recovery capabilities.
Flexibility: Supports diverse storage requirements without needing physical infrastructure.

In industries like media and entertainment, S3 stores massive media files for streaming and distribution. Healthcare firms use it for secure patient data storage. Technology companies leverage its data lake capabilities for managing analytics workloads. It serves as a backend storage solution for web applications, aiding seamless data management across sectors.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud provides a managed, high-performance storage solution designed for enterprise workloads and complex data environments, ensuring seamless integration with Google Cloud.

It offers enterprises an efficient way to manage storage needs in Google Cloud, with features focused on high performance, ease of use, and robust data management. This service facilitates quick deployment, reliability, and data protection, allowing organizations to focus on operational efficiency without the complexities of traditional infrastructure.

What are the most important features?

High Performance: Delivers consistent, scalable performance for demanding applications.
Ease of Use: Simplified management and deployment reduce administrative overhead.
Data Protection: Includes built-in snapshots and replication for data integrity and disaster recovery.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Google Cloud services for streamlined workflows.
Scalability: Easily scales with business growth, providing storage on demand.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Cost Efficiency: Optimizes storage costs with automated tiering and flexible pricing models.
Enhanced Productivity: Reduces time spent on storage management, allowing teams to focus on core tasks.
Reliability: Provides a dependable infrastructure with high uptime and data availability.
Agility: Enables rapid adaptation to changing business needs with quick scalability.

In industries like finance and healthcare, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is implemented to ensure secure data handling and regulatory compliance. Its capabilities in data protection and rapid scaling are particularly valuable in these sectors, where data integrity and fast access are priorities.

NetApp

Sample Customers

Netflix, Airbnb, Thomson Reuters, Zillow, Alert Logic

Atos, Bandwidth, Wuxi NextCode

Buyer's Guide

Amazon S3 vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

September 2026

Free Report: Amazon S3 vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon S3 vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Amazon S3 vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.