NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud comparison

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud are both solutions in the Cloud Migration category. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is ranked #3 with an average rating of 9.5, while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is ranked #24. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP holds a 6.1% mindshare in CM, compared to NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud users who would recommend it.

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Read 64 NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP reviews

9,473 Views
1,895 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Read 3 NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud reviews

1,952 Views
586 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP and NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud compete in the cloud storage solutions category. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP stands out due to its flexibility and performance, while NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is favored for its seamless integration and support.

Features: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is praised for its efficient data management, backup capabilities, and versatility in various cloud environments. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud receives positive feedback for its automatic scaling, native integration with Google Cloud services, and efficient data management.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP could improve initial setup complexity, cost predictability, and provide better user documentation. For NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, users recommend enhancing documentation, offering more detailed cost analytics, and improving data migration tools.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is noted for its complex but highly customizable deployment, supported by attentive customer service. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is highlighted for its straightforward deployment and strong integration with Google Cloud's customer support.

Pricing and ROI: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP users mention higher initial setup costs but value its long-term ROI and cost-efficiency in multi-cloud setups. Users of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud find it offers competitive pricing and satisfactory ROI through Google's pay-as-you-go model.

To learn more, read our detailed NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,153 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Ranking in Cloud Migration

3rd

Ranking in Cloud Storage

9th

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

11th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (27th), Cloud Software Defined Storage (2nd)

NetApp Cloud Volumes Servic...

Ranking in Cloud Migration

24th

Ranking in Cloud Storage

19th

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

17th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Cloud Migration category, the mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is 6.1%, down from 14.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is 2.6%, up from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Migration Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP	6.1%
NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud	2.6%
Other	91.3%

Cloud Migration

Featured Reviews

reviewer5948293

Principal Consultant at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Offers performance control and cloud integration while supporting data management with granular flexibility

The scalability of NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is interesting. We have thought about it, but we haven't used it. I think the scalability is something you scale up rather than respond to peak demand. It wouldn't help with outages either; the scaling is manual, and there are no processes we've used to automate that for unexpected scenarios. We like the scalability; it's enough for what we're planning to use, but we haven't used any advanced features. The standard platform is NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP, which is their cloud service. In fact, that's probably the most experience I have with NetApp. I've experienced it on-premise, but kind of secondhand.

Read full review

Colin Constable

Co-Founder at Atsign

Enables us to fine-tune storage and capacity on the fly as our needs grow or shrink over time

NetApp delivers High Availability. It's critical to our work. That was the main driver for using NetApp. We have a highly resilient service and if you have a highly resilient service, you are only as resilient as the least resilient part of your infrastructure. That's what we were having trouble with our file system before. It was becoming troublesome, so we needed to find something that was much more highly resilient so that's why we moved to NetApp. The complexity of moving large numbers of files to the cloud depends on what you're trying to do. But for us, it was really simple. I imagine for large enterprise customers it is probably pretty tricky. They're probably on all different technologies inside a large corporation and they may or may not have very large pipes going to them. So if you're in a data center to the cloud then it's going to be easy, but if you have hundreds of branches like if you're a bank and have lots of branch banks, they might have very small pipes out to the internet. It might take forever. In our use case everything's brand new files, so it was pretty trivial. We didn't migrate to the cloud, we were already on the cloud, so it was a nonissue for us. NetApp enables us to share data across VMs. It actually reduced the amount of data storage we need. We were having to have storage attached to each VM. And now we can aggregate that storage across multiple VMs, so that actually gave us a net reduction, which was a good thing. We switched from using block storage to file storage to share data between our VMs. It made it easier, frankly but I worry about the scalability in the future. For the moment it made life easier. We were using block and then we moved back to file with NetApp.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"One thing I have noticed is that it is very simple to move the data where we need to move it, delete it, or archive it if we need to archive it to StorageGRID."

"I like how you can easily pair on-prem with the cloud and the cloud backup feature. I like the whole integration with on-prem and the cloud for SnapMirror relationships."

"ONTAP's snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are pretty useful in recovering your data from a time in a snapshot. That's pretty useful for when you have an event where a disaster struck and then you need to recover all your data. It's pretty helpful and pretty fast in those terms."

"The ability to see things going back and forth has been quite useful."

"The solution’s Snapshot copies and thin clones in terms of operational recovery are the best thing since sliced bread. Rollback is super easy. It's just simple, and it works. It's very efficient."

"It is much easier to control data since we can run queries across all our platforms with just one solution. Not only that, we can also monitor all the platforms with Active IQ, where we can see all the alerts, messages, and space consumption through a single application. This is regardless if the data is on-prem or AWS. It is much more efficient."

"Snapshots are one valuable feature within ONTAP, but CVO's appeal is that it acts just like the on-prem solution. It's the same OS, but in the cloud. We can continue to use ONTAP as we did on-premise."

"We are definitely in the process of reducing our footprint on our secondary data center and all those snapshots technically reduce tape backup. That's from the protection perspective, but as far as files, it's much easier to use and manage and it's faster, too."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pros

"It is a good service for high availability that is very easy to configure."

"In terms of its storage snapshot efficiencies, the service is highly efficient. We are only doing things in small batches right now because we have not converted all of the data, but we have tested them in the Google Cloud and they work efficiently."

"Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero."

"Overall, they have very impressive technologies."

"High availability is very important to us because we have a production environment. High availability is the highest priority for us to continue keeping our systems running."

"Storage was taking up maybe 10 to 20% of my life at the startup, and now it takes up zero. I was personally running all the infrastructure for the company. Now that we've moved to NetApp, I don't have to worry about making sure it's up and running. It's made my life personally much better."

Cons

"Only AWS and Azure public clouds are currently available from China, and I would like to see support for Aliyun (Alibaba Cloud)."

"NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP does have a bit of initial complexity for users who are new to the system."

"In terms of improvement, I would like to see the Azure NetApp Files have the capability of doing SnapMirrors. Azure NetApp Files is, as we know, is an AFF system and it's not used in any of the Microsoft resources. It's basically NetApp hardware, so the best performance you can achieve, but the only reason we can't use that right now is because of the region that it's available in. The second was the SnapMirror capability that we didn't have that we heavily rely on right now."

"The product is more restricted with underlying cloud."

"One difficulty is that it has no SAP HANA certification. The asset performance restrictions create challenges with the infrastructure underneath: The disks and stuff like that often have lower latencies than SAP HANA itself has to have."

"NetApp's support could improve"

"It needs better reporting. Right now, we had to put everything one to the other just to figure out what could be the issue."

"How it handles erasure coding. I feel it the improvement should be there. Basically, it should be seamless. You don't want to have an underlying hardware issue or something, then suddenly there's no reads or writes. Luckily, it's at a replication site, so our main production site is still working and writing to it. But, the replication site has stopped right now while we try to bring that node back. Since we implemented in bare-metal, not in appliance, we had to go back to the original vendor. They didn't send it in time, and we had a hardware memory issue. Then, we had a hard disk issue, which brought the node down physically."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP cons

"It would help if they increased the area in which they employ artificial intelligence, by starting to do assessments on the environments, to project those. They're not using any AI tools, currently, on the administrative side."

"The user interface has room for improvement. We would like this service to be more integrated with Azure, which is very easy to manage and use. It was easy to create volumes and add capacity pools in Azure, but in Google Cloud, we can only create separate volumes. We need more management or configuration options in the user interface."

"I would like for the sales team to get in contact more often and let me know what I should be doing next, what we should be doing about new features. So it would be nice if I heard a little bit more from him. From a technology perspective, I have no complaints."

"The user interface has room for improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing could be improved. It is a good product, but it is very expensive for me."

"They give us a good price for CVO licenses. It is one of the reasons that we went with the product."

"If we wanted to use the AWS solution, we would have to manage two or three different platforms and pay more money than what we should have to pay, as some of the features don't even exist. If we wanted to, we could use AWS cloning, but it is useless because it uses more space, is more expensive, and takes more time."

"The cost is quite high."

"For NetApp it's about $20,000 for a single node and $30,000 for the HA."

"Overall, the pricing of NetApp is aggressive and the pricing becomes more aggressive as the amount of data increases. The cost for a given volume of data that you are storing becomes lower. The greater the volume of data, the cheaper the license."

"The pricing of this solution is definitely higher than what the typical Azure Files and AWS solutions charge, but given the features and the stability NetApp has provided, we are okay with it. We are not complaining about the pricing."

"If a customer is only using, say, less than 10 terabytes, I don't think CVO would be a good option. A customer using at least 100 or 200 terabytes should get a reasonable price from NetApp."

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP pricing and cost advice

"We don't need so much space, and there is no option to pay as we go or use just what we need. Also, the only way to increase performance is by increasing the level of the service."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	53

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is actually quite reasonable in price compared to other native cloud storage options. For example, a customer using 100 TB of AWS storage would not benefit from deduplica...

See all answers

What needs improvement with NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

It would be nice to see technology supporting the Elastic Fabric Adapter on Amazon AWS, therefore getting RDMA technology for more low-latency connections.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP?

I use NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP mostly in customer companies.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 7% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 4% of the time

Amazon FSx vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 4% of the time

CTERA Enterprise File Services Platform vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for AWS vs NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

Compared 3% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP Competitors

Amazon S3 vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Database Backup Service vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 11% of the time

Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

Google Cloud Storage vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

More NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP

July 2026

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP product report

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

July 2026

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud report

Download NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud product report

Also Known As

ONTAP Cloud, CVO, NetApp CVO

CVS for Google Cloud, NetApp CVS for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud, Cloud Volumes Service for GCP, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for GCP

Overview

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.

NetApp

NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud provides a managed, high-performance storage solution designed for enterprise workloads and complex data environments, ensuring seamless integration with Google Cloud.

It offers enterprises an efficient way to manage storage needs in Google Cloud, with features focused on high performance, ease of use, and robust data management. This service facilitates quick deployment, reliability, and data protection, allowing organizations to focus on operational efficiency without the complexities of traditional infrastructure.

What are the most important features?

High Performance: Delivers consistent, scalable performance for demanding applications.
Ease of Use: Simplified management and deployment reduce administrative overhead.
Data Protection: Includes built-in snapshots and replication for data integrity and disaster recovery.
Flexible Integration: Seamlessly integrates with Google Cloud services for streamlined workflows.
Scalability: Easily scales with business growth, providing storage on demand.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Cost Efficiency: Optimizes storage costs with automated tiering and flexible pricing models.
Enhanced Productivity: Reduces time spent on storage management, allowing teams to focus on core tasks.
Reliability: Provides a dependable infrastructure with high uptime and data availability.
Agility: Enables rapid adaptation to changing business needs with quick scalability.

In industries like finance and healthcare, NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud is implemented to ensure secure data handling and regulatory compliance. Its capabilities in data protection and rapid scaling are particularly valuable in these sectors, where data integrity and fast access are priorities.

NetApp

Sample Customers

1. Accenture 2. Acer 3. Adidas 4. Aetna 5. AIG 6. Apple 7. Bank of America 8. Barclays 9. Bayer 10. Berkshire Hathaway 11. BNP Paribas 12. Cisco 13. Coca-Cola 14. Comcast 15.ConocoPhillips 16. CVS Health 17. Dell 18. Deutsche Bank 19. eBay 20. Eli Lilly 21. FedEx 22. Ford 23. Freescale Semiconductor 24. General Electric 25. Google 26. Honeywell 27. IBM 28. Intel 29. Intuit 30. JPMorgan Chase 31. Kellogg's 32. KeyCorp 33. Liberty Mutual 34. L'Oréal 35. Mastercard

Atos, Bandwidth, Wuxi NextCode

Buyer's Guide

NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

August 2026

Free Report: NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP vs. NetApp Cloud Volumes Service for Google Cloud report.

See our list of best Cloud Migration vendors, best Cloud Storage vendors, and best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.