Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Alluvio AppResponse vs Azure Monitor comparison

Riverbed and Microsoft are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. Riverbed is ranked #50 with an average rating of 8.0, while Microsoft is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.8. Riverbed holds a 0.2% mindshare in APM, compared to Microsoft’s 6.7% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Riverbed users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.
Alluvio AppResponse
Read 17 Alluvio AppResponse reviews
  • 474 Views
  • 191 Comparison Views
93% willing to recommend
Azure Monitor
Read 55 Azure Monitor reviews
  • 13,217 Views
  • 8,405 Comparison Views
90% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

Alluvio AppResponse and Azure Monitor are enterprise-grade monitoring tools competing in the network and systems monitoring category. Azure Monitor has the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set though Alluvio AppResponse is favored for deployment and customer service.

What features are offered by Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse offers deep packet inspection, effective network behavior analysis, and powerful troubleshooting tools. Azure Monitor provides extensive integration capabilities, robust analytics, and a detailed and flexible alerting system.

What areas of improvement can be found in Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse could benefit from a more intuitive setup, enhanced reporting, and greater ease of use. Azure Monitor needs improvements in its log search functionalities, streamlined alert configuration process, and reduced complexity for new users.

How is the ease of deployment and customer service of Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse is easier to deploy with supportive customer service. Azure Monitor offers extensive documentation but involves a more complex setup process, making Alluvio AppResponse preferred for deployment and customer support.

What setup costs and ROI can be seen with Alluvio AppResponse in comparison to Azure Monitor?

Alluvio AppResponse users report a higher initial setup cost but recognize value through its specific features' ROI. Azure Monitor is generally more expensive on a subscription basis but delivers high ROI via integrated services and scalability.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Alluvio AppResponse
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
50th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (59th)
Azure Monitor
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
5th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
55
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Monitoring Software (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of Alluvio AppResponse is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Azure Monitor is 6.7%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
 

Featured Reviews

Ahmet Kilic - PeerSpot reviewer
It's a total solution that gives you end-to-end visibility at all levels
I rate Alluvio AppResponse 10 out of 10. If you work for a financial company especially, you probably face problems on the application side. The problem is easy to identify, but you need to determine the root cause. You can solve issues easily via AppResponse because it shows you all the details of your transactions so you can see the real problem in the database, network, software, etc. For example, you can find the solution easily if you create the right dashboard on your site. If you can't find the problem, you can observe or investigate PCAP.
Read full review
Muhammad Usman Khawar - PeerSpot reviewer
Native integration simplifies monitoring but documentation and cost improvements are needed
The ease of access in Azure is significant since it's native to the platform and easy to integrate. It has no maintenance overhead, and users don't have to navigate to another portal to get their desired result. It's the handiness that it has, rather than the features. The interpretation from the logs and injection requires custom runbooks. While it's complex, many services provide native insights and workbooks. It does the basic job quite efficiently. They added new kinds of metrics with more integrations to send out metrics. They have even added support for third-party tools that can be integrated. Azure Monitor is working on improvements and becoming more mature. Azure Monitor is stable and scalable. Azure Monitor is evolving with new workbooks and dashboards.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It's a stable product. Riverbed has invested a significant amount of research and development into it, so it's a solid tool overall."
"Ability to see end to end user, application, server, and network response time and throughput data."
"You need a packet capture device to perform any type of network monitoring. It helps ensure that network overloads don't happen with alerts allowing for proactive decisions."
"The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance."
"I have found the AppResponse, which is a packet capture solution, very good. It gives you the ability to drill down back in time. You've got all the packets there. You can troubleshoot it later, not immediately. It's very interesting."
"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."
"We really like the scalability capabilities."
"With some APM solutions, it can take a long time to check a periodic report, but you can get all the necessary details quickly with AppResponse."
More Alluvio AppResponse pros
"Azure Monitor's best features are its graphs and charts, the different visibility options, and reporting."
"Log analytics and log queries are the most valuable features of Azure Monitor."
"The features that are most valuable are the alerting function and also the logging functionality to analyze certain issues using log analytics"
"Azure Monitor gives us the observability to check everything that we have in the cloud."
"I can conclude reports for the monthly, weekly, and peak time of the resources."
"Azure Monitor is useful because of the useful application insights and telemetry, such as metrics and logs."
"Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment."
"Azure Monitor is really just a source for Dynatrace. It's just collecting data and monitoring the environment and the infrastructure. It is fairly good at that."
More Azure Monitor pros
 

Cons

"The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive."
"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."
"The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data."
"Need to bring back the NetFlow module for AppResponse."
"The initial setup is straightforward, but you have to know a little about the product. It's not for everybody to just plug and play. If you know how the solution is implemented then it is straightforward."
"The recent changes in corporate structure may have caused some decrease in support quality."
"Integration between NPM and APM solutions would improve efficiency. There is no agent on the server site related to AppResponse."
More Alluvio AppResponse cons
"I'd like the solution to do more around vulnerability assessment. It's lacking in the product right now."
"The process of implementation needs to be easier."
"The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that the actual cost of the Kubernetes cluster was less than the cost they were incurring for Azure Monitor."
"The pricing model could be more flexible."
"This solution has fewer features than some of its competitors, so adding more features to it would make it better."
"Although it's not always the case, the price can sometimes get expensive. This depends on a number of factors, such as how many services you are trying to integrate with Azure Monitor and how much storage they're consuming each month (for example, how large are the log files?)."
"Setting up this solution is complex. It's also missing the functionality of assigning alerts."
"We encounter some difficulties in monitoring the operating system on its own."
More Azure Monitor cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price is a little bit high, especially because we have to pay an import tax."
"The licensing model is expensive compared to its competitors, but the service it gives to your business, and the data quality, means that it's worth it."
"It is costly for small and medium businesses."
"The solution is no more expensive than other products."
"Customers of Azure Monitor must pay an amount that depends largely on how many services they need to integrate and the storage space required in terms of logs, etc. If they only have a few small services to monitor, the price won't be too high, but on the opposite side of the spectrum, it can certainly get pricey."
"The licensing is a monthly fee."
"Its cost depends on the ingestion of the logs. It could go anywhere. For an out-of-the-box platform such as FrameFlow, you pay pretty much a fixed price and you get what you get, whereas, with something like Azure Monitor, you pay by the ingestion charge, so you can have one client who pays hardly anything for the same alerts, and another client pays loads and loads."
"It's a costly solution"
"I would rate Azure Monitor a two out of five for affordability."
"There is a monthly fee for the alerts triggered and the data stored."
"The solution is very costly because you have to pay for various things such as adding to logs and internet alerts."
"Since we are using the basic set, it is more cost-effective compared to other third-party APM solutions."
More Azure Monitor pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
14%
Energy/Utilities Company
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The most valuable feature of Alluvio AppResponse is the actual response time for measuring performance.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The pricing of Riverbed Alluvio AppResponse is really high. Very few customers buy Riverbed because many do not have the sufficient budget. Its pricing is comparatively higher than SolarWinds. Rive...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Riverbed SteelCentral AppResponse?
The reporting models need improvement as most of the time, we have to customize the reports manually. Additionally, a feature similar to SolarWinds AppStack, which provides a holistic view of the i...
See all answers
How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?
Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...
See all answers
What do you like most about Azure Monitor?
Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?
The primary challenge is the documentation. The major challenge that remains is the costing factor for the logs ingestion. The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
LogicMonitor vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 19% of the time
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Nagios XI vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 17% of the time
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 17% of the time
Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
Splunk AppDynamics vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 17% of the time
OP5 Monitor vs Alluvio AppResponse Logo
OP5 Monitor vs Alluvio AppResponse
Compared 16% of the time
More Alluvio AppResponse Competitors
Datadog vs Azure Monitor Logo
Datadog vs Azure Monitor
Compared 22% of the time
Sentry vs Azure Monitor Logo
Sentry vs Azure Monitor
Compared 14% of the time
Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor Logo
Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor
Compared 13% of the time
Grafana vs Azure Monitor Logo
Grafana vs Azure Monitor
Compared 11% of the time
New Relic vs Azure Monitor Logo
New Relic vs Azure Monitor
Compared 6% of the time
More Azure Monitor Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
June 2025
Alluvio AppResponse reportDownload Alluvio AppResponse product report
Buyer's Guide
Azure Monitor
June 2025
Azure Monitor reportDownload Azure Monitor product report
 

Also Known As

Riverbed AppResponse, OPNET SteelCentral AppResponse, ACE Live, OPNET, AppResponse Xpert
No data available
 

Overview

Alluvio AppResponse provides fast packet capture and storage that feeds intelligent network and application analysis with fast troubleshooting workflows to speed problem diagnosis and resolution. AppResponse delivers full stack application analysis—from packets to web pages - enabling you observe all network and application interactions as they cross the wire, whether they are encrypted or not. Using powerful, flexible network and application analytics and workflows, AppResponse speeds problem diagnosis and resolution, helping you get to answers fast

Riverbed

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure. 

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts. 

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.  

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility. 

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft
 

Sample Customers

N11.com, OneMain Financial, China Bank, Halkbank, Kaust
Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group
Buyer's Guide
Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor
June 2025
Free Report: Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor
Find out what your peers are saying about Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Alluvio AppResponse vs. Azure Monitor report.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.