We performed a comparison between ADONIS and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is a stable solution."
"It's a very complete solution."
"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."
"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"
"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."
"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."
"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."
"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."
"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."
"When you update a page, the information on the quick links sidebar on the left side doesn't stay in the same place. It moves down, so you have to scroll to find it. That's not very user-friendly."
"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."
"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."
"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
ADONIS is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 5 reviews while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 14th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 7 reviews. ADONIS is rated 8.0, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of ADONIS writes "Offers a training part and a production part for modeling processes, allowing for efficient process modeling". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "Great for knowledge management, constantly evolving, and helps build good workflows". ADONIS is most compared with ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager, Camunda, Bizagi and ARIS Cloud, whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, IBM BPM, webMethods Integration Server, Camunda and Agiloft Workflow and BPM. See our ADONIS vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
