ADONIS vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint comparison

BOC Group and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. BOC Group is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5, while OpenText is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.3. BOC Group holds a 1.3% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BOC Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

ADONIS

Read 8 ADONIS reviews

3,174 Views
3,079 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 17 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

2,481 Views
2,382 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

ADONIS

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and ADONIS compete in the document management and business process modeling categories, respectively. OpenText 360 has an advantage due to superior document management and seamless Microsoft integration, while ADONIS excels in process modeling and analytics.

Features: OpenText 360 integrates with Microsoft Teams, automating workflows with Power Automate and supporting SAP integration. Its real-time document access and audit trails facilitate collaboration. ADONIS offers drag-and-drop process modeling, comprehensive process documentation, and user-friendly simulation models aiding compliance and decision-making.

Room for Improvement: OpenText 360 requires a simpler licensing model and improved user-friendliness. Enhancements in integration and performance are also desired. ADONIS needs a more user-friendly interface and better support for advanced process automation, including AI and machine learning integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 offers diverse deployment options and generally favorable Microsoft-backed support, although support quality can vary. ADONIS provides similar deployment flexibility, but its support channels can be complex, with moderate technical assistance ratings.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 uses a subscription-based model, seen as reasonable within the Microsoft ecosystem, offering significant ROI through document process optimization. ADONIS has competitive BPM pricing, but its licensing complexity might deter some users. Both solutions provide notable ROI, despite challenges in cost structures.

To learn more, read our detailed ADONIS vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,725 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADONIS

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

20th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of ADONIS is 1.3%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 1.2%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ADONIS	1.3%
OpenText 360 for SharePoint	1.2%
Other	97.5%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Ostap Kharysh

Product Manager & Student at University of Vienna

The tool supports university projects with effective modeling and a comprehensive toolset

The pure modeling capabilities with drag-and-drop elements for business process diagrams are excellent. The ability to move smoothly from the process landscape to the business process model diagram is appreciated. The simulation model is user-friendly, and the analysis features offer correct insights quickly. It helps me explore and identify the best candidates for automation. ADONIS supports the project hierarchy and allows collaboration through methodological reviews and comments, enhancing decision-making.

Read full review

Sasikumar Balachandran

Senior BI Lead at Cognizant

Enhancing user experience and data management with effective central repository capabilities

The area of improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint is that sometimes there are unexpected service outages. Though these situations are rare, I want to highlight that in case of any outage in the services, because everything is located in SharePoint, there is a chance that reports start failing or dashboards fail, or the system behaves differently. In future updates, I would want to see widgets available in OpenText 360 for SharePoint to interact with third-party tools. For example, when creating a dashboard, having the ability to embed these directly into SharePoint would be beneficial. Currently, I have to use hyperlinks to access other tools such as Tableau or ClickView. If it were possible to merge everything and bring all information from multiple teams (Cognos, ClickView, AWS) into SharePoint as a centralized place, it would be really helpful. That is what I envision for the integrator part.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"ADONIS supports the project hierarchy and allows collaboration through methodological reviews and comments, enhancing decision-making."

"The support is fantastic and we have really good contact with them, it's very easy to use."

"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."

"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"

"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."

"It's a very complete solution and user-friendly."

"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."

"The process modeling interface of ADONIS is very comprehensive, being more complete than Camunda in terms of process documentation and process components such as risks, KPI, and other process components, making it excellent for process documentation, compliance, and repository."

More ADONIS pros

"We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years."

"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."

"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."

"The overall benefit I get from using this solution is developing in a more secure environment with distributed architecture and even distribution of work across resources where full control on the code and repository is required."

"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."

"OpenText 360 for SharePoint significantly saves time for users by streamlining the tasks of handling, searching, and maintaining documents compared to traditional file servers."

"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."

"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

Cons

"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."

"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."

"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."

"This solution would be more scalable for our business if we could make certain changes, including adding the Russian language."

"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."

"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."

"ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users."

"ADONIS needs improvement in its user interface functionality."

More ADONIS cons

"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."

"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."

"It is not scalable."

"The user interface could definitely be improved."

"The GUI should be improved for better user experience. Additionally, while there are standard connectors for automation and approvals in Power Platform, some tasks still need to be handled with API request calls instead of direct connectors, which could be improved."

"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."

"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."

"To be honest, my experience with OpenText is that usually, they are not doing too much on quality assurance with their product."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing is medium, so I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product’s price is quite competitive."

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

"On-premises version is expensive"

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"It has a reasonable price."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ADONIS?

I stopped using ADONIS because it is not capable of integrating and automating business processes for the POC. I see that Camunda is more capable for our POC project to orchestrate business process...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ADONIS?

We are using Camunda for process modeling, some collaborations for process development, and for the process documentation repository, we use SharePoint. We have used ADONIS process modeler, not jus...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering ADONIS?

I have not integrated it with other products in my system because we are just using the free version. I am planning to purchase the Team version or Business plan for the initial proof of concept pr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Regarding the licensing setup cost and price overall, the licensing costs are reasonable. As an enterprise organization, we have enterprise service level agreements with customers and Microsoft par...

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

For SharePoint, the user-friendliness needs to be improved. It is not as simple to use as GitHub, which has a very straightforward interface. I would prefer it to become more minimalistic like GitH...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

My project manager must be using the search capabilities of OpenText 360 for SharePoint, though I am not certain.

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ADONIS

Compared 17% of the time

ARIS BPA vs ADONIS

Compared 14% of the time

ARIS Process Governance vs ADONIS

Compared 9% of the time

Camunda vs ADONIS

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs ADONIS

Compared 6% of the time

More ADONIS Competitors

Camunda vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

Agiloft Workflow and BPM vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 7% of the time

Bizagi vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

Apache Airflow vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

Pega Platform vs OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

August 2026

Download ADONIS product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

August 2026

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Also Known As

No data available

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

Overview

ADONIS is a stable, scalable platform supporting business process management with features for modeling, process accessibility, and decision-making. Known for its comprehensive nature, it aids in clear process documentation and robust support.

ADONIS provides a versatile BPM suite that empowers organizations in process mapping and modeling. It supports collaboration and offers user-friendly simulations, aiding decision-making with insights for automation. Despite lacking 24/7 support and limited export features, ADONIS is integral for creating documentation and conducting workshops. Challenges include complex setup and administrator management, but its comprehensive features support learning in academic settings and deployment by consultants.

What are the key features of ADONIS?

Personalized View: Provides easy access to processes.
Drag-and-Drop Modeling: Simplifies process modeling.
Robust Analytics: Offers strong insights into business processes.
Collaboration Tools: Facilitates teamwork across platforms.
Simulation Features: Aids in user-friendly process simulations.
Documentation Support: Includes features for risks and KPIs.

What benefits can users expect from ADONIS reviews?

Ease of Use: Consistently highlighted for its straightforward interface.
Comprehensive Nature: Surpasses alternatives in process documentation.
Scalability: Supports growing business needs.
Robust Support: Reliable customer support services.

In specific industries, ADONIS is used for versatile purposes like business process management, modeling, academic learning, and consultancy deployment. Organizations engage with ADONIS in both active and read-only modes, highlighting its adaptability in diverse settings.

BOC Group

OpenText 360 for SharePoint enhances collaboration and document management by offering seamless integration with Microsoft Teams, strong file compatibility, and customizable workflows, supporting real-time access and automation.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint provides an efficient platform for document management and workflow automation through features like metadata retrieval and version control. It offers integration with Microsoft Teams and SAP APIs, enhancing collaboration across industries. While users face challenges with licensing complexity and Office 365 integration, OpenText 360 plays a critical role in digitalizing documents and managing workflows. Despite its strong capabilities, improvements in pricing flexibility and support services are needed to elevate user experience.

What are the key features of OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

Customization: Offers flexible workflows and approval processes.
Integration: Seamless with Microsoft Teams and SAP APIs.
File Compatibility: Supports diverse file formats effortlessly.
Collaboration: Real-time document management and access.
Metadata Retrieval: Enhances document indexing and search.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Improved document management and workflow automation.
Security: Robust document retention and audit trail features.
Flexibility: Customizable workflows tailored to business needs.
Scalability: Supports high-volume document processing.
Automation: Simplified invoicing and operations through SAP APIs.

In industries like legal and utilities, OpenText 360 for SharePoint is implemented for its document management capabilities. It integrates with tools like Microsoft Teams to enable efficient workflows and digitalization processes, supporting enterprise document indexing and advanced search functions across sectors.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: ABB, Allianz, Comcast, ERGO, Emerson, Glencore, Lincoln Financial Group, Marel, Raiffeisen bank, Schroders, Southern Water, Stadt Wien, UNIQA, VAUDE, Voestalpine, Volksbank, Vorwerk

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

August 2026

Free Report: ADONIS vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Find out what your peers are saying about ADONIS vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ADONIS vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.