ADONIS vs IBM Case Foundation comparison

BOC Group and IBM are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. BOC Group is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5, while IBM is ranked #30 with an average rating of 8.0. BOC Group holds a 2.7% mindshare in BPM, compared to IBM’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of BOC Group users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of IBM users who would recommend it.

ADONIS

Read 8 ADONIS reviews

2,232 Views
2,165 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

IBM Case Foundation

Read 14 IBM Case Foundation reviews

416 Views
412 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

ADONIS

IBM Case Foundation

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

IBM Case Foundation and ADONIS compete in the enterprise software market. ADONIS has the upper hand with its feature-rich offering, although IBM Case Foundation excels in affordability and support.

Features: IBM Case Foundation is known for efficient document management and robust process automation, allowing seamless workflow management. It enhances decision-making capabilities through its advanced document analytics and maintains stability ideal for handling complex data environments. ADONIS offers a comprehensive BPM suite with intuitive modeling tools that enable efficient process optimization. It provides a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop design functionality and supports detailed business analytics and reporting.

Room for Improvement: IBM Case Foundation can improve by enhancing its user interface for better usability, expanding its BPM focus to match evolving industry standards, and providing more customization options in search functionalities. ADONIS could benefit from more competitive pricing options, improved integration with non-process-oriented tools, and an expansion of predefined templates to facilitate faster deployment.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM Case Foundation integrates smoothly with IBM products, supported by comprehensive services helping organizations leverage existing infrastructure. Its deployment can be complex for non-IBM systems. ADONIS offers cloud-based deployment praised for its simplicity and effective integration strategies. It provides proactive customer service noted for its responsiveness and practical support methods.

Pricing and ROI: IBM Case Foundation presents lower upfront costs and gradual ROI focusing on documentation cost reduction. ADONIS requires a higher initial investment but offers faster ROI by enhancing process efficiency and strategic BPM enhancements, appealing to organizations focusing on long-term benefits over immediate savings.

To learn more, read our detailed ADONIS vs. IBM Case Foundation Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. IBM Case Foundation

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 871,469 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADONIS

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

19th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

IBM Case Foundation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

30th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of ADONIS is 2.7%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of IBM Case Foundation is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ADONIS	2.7%
IBM Case Foundation	0.5%
Other	96.8%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Teguh Surya

AVP B2B Business Process Excellence at PT. Indosat Tbk

Process capabilities impress while user setup requires streamlining

I stopped using ADONIS because it is not capable of integrating and automating business processes for the POC. I see that Camunda is more capable for our POC project to orchestrate business processes. We also plan to integrate with UiPath because currently, we are focusing on task automations, not process orchestrations. In the future, we plan to implement process orchestrations. I see that Camunda can integrate UiPath into the process, process model, and process integrations. ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users.

Read full review

Nouman Nawaz

Deputy Director - IT(Plans) at DHA Lahore

Mature product in terms of security and stable product

The architecture is a bit difficult, but in BAW, they introduced the Business Automation Workflow. It's a bit easier compared to Case Manager. Currently, we use Case Manager, so it's a bit difficult to upgrade and handle, but BAW is comparatively much better and easier to handle. The limitation is only for customization because IBM doesn't support it. In some scenarios, if you want some business processes to be customized, we have already spoken two or three times with IBM representatives that we have to customize some of the features in this business process. They would say that if you want to do this automation at your own end, then okay, fine, go ahead, but we are not supporting all this customization. The only thing is the customization because it's a complete standard application.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's a very complete solution."

"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"

"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."

"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."

"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."

"ADONIS supports the project hierarchy and allows collaboration through methodological reviews and comments, enhancing decision-making."

"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."

"The most valuable feature is the content manager part of the file as it is very stable, robust, and reliable."

"The solution is scalable."

"The most valuable features are those involving decision making, analysis, and anything related to event documents because those processes are related to content as well."

"The client and the IBM content navigation are the solution's most valuable features."

"The content management is great."

"The only thing is that we can easily track where the application is in the process, from manual to automation."

"The most valuable feature is its stability, which is why we are using it."

"It's very easy."

More IBM Case Foundation pros

Cons

"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."

"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."

"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."

"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."

"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."

"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."

"ADONIS needs improvement in its user interface functionality."

"ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users."

"The service as it currently stands is out-of-date and lacks flexibility."

"The solution can be quite expensive."

"IBM needs to update the user interfaces of all its products to make them more intuitive and accessible to beginners. Compared to Microsoft products, IBM solutions are less user-friendly. IBM programs are hard to master. It's a problem in my region because it's hard to find IT staff who can work with IBM."

"The cloud version could use more stability."

"There is a need for more open and flexible integration capabilities, allowing seamless collaboration with a broader spectrum of business process management solutions, beyond the confines of IBM's document management offerings."

"90% of the feedback we receive states that the UI is not very user-friendly."

"The interface needs to be more user-friendly."

"The place of improvement is merging or combining all of the workflow functionality into one seamless tool. Now, there are multiple installations that are different. Case Foundation, before you can put Case Manager and you've got IBM BPM, and the roadmap is there to merge them altogether. But that's the struggle at the moment, it's having multiple installations and disparate workflow applications."

More IBM Case Foundation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product's pricing is medium, so I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product’s price is quite competitive."

"IBM Case Foundation is a little expensive."

"This is not an expensive solution and we are using the standard license."

"Pricing is in the mid-range, it is not cheap, but it's not expensive."

"The price falls in the middle range—not overly expensive but not extremely affordable either."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

871,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ADONIS?

It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop

See all answers

What needs improvement with ADONIS?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ADONIS?

We are using Camunda for process modeling, some collaborations for process development, and for the process documentation repository, we use SharePoint. We have used ADONIS process modeler, not jus...

See all answers

What do you like most about IBM Case Foundation?

A valuable feature includes seamless integration with the document management system, along with robust capabilities in analytics and reporting.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Case Foundation?

The tool is expensive for my customers; it is very expensive, more than other solutions. Some customers say it is more expensive. The license cost for Cloud Pak is per user and increases with the n...

See all answers

What needs improvement with IBM Case Foundation?

We face some challenges with IBM Case Foundation from our customers, particularly with administration and configuration. We face many issues and open tickets with IBM regarding that, especially som...

See all answers

Comparisons

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ADONIS

Compared 25% of the time

ARIS BPA vs ADONIS

Compared 20% of the time

Camunda vs ADONIS

Compared 19% of the time

Bizagi vs ADONIS

Compared 9% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs ADONIS

Compared 6% of the time

More ADONIS Competitors

IBM Business Automation Workflow vs IBM Case Foundation

Compared 37% of the time

OpenText MBPM vs IBM Case Foundation

Compared 33% of the time

IBM BPM vs IBM Case Foundation

Compared 30% of the time

More IBM Case Foundation Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

October 2025

Download ADONIS product report

Buyer's Guide

IBM Case Foundation

October 2025

Download IBM Case Foundation product report

Also Known As

No data available

Case Foundation, FileNet Business Process Manager

Overview

ADONIS BPM suite is users' best-rated tool for process management, analysis and optimization, trusted by SMEs and large corporations worldwide. It helps you transform your business and create competitive advantage by streamlining processes, enhancing operational efficiency, boosting transparency and creating a customer-centric organization. You can start creating your digital twin with ADONIS already today, as the cloud-based ADONIS:Community Edition is available for free. For more information please visit www.boc-group.com/en/adonis/.

BOC Group

IBM Case Foundation is for organizations that need to harness unstructured information and integrate it with business processes to drive critical business decisions. It enables organizations to create, manage and optimize case-based processes and is designed to decrease development costs while significantly improving process performance. Case Foundation links specific pieces of content with a structured workflow. It's an on ramp for organizations that choose to move from document-centric workflow solutions to the advanced capabilities of IBM Case Manager.

IBM

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: ABB, Allianz, Comcast, ERGO, Emerson, Glencore, Lincoln Financial Group, Marel, Raiffeisen bank, Schroders, Southern Water, Stadt Wien, UNIQA, VAUDE, Voestalpine, Volksbank, Vorwerk

Suncorp Group Limited

Buyer's Guide

ADONIS vs. IBM Case Foundation

September 2025

Free Report: ADONIS vs. IBM Case Foundation

Find out what your peers are saying about ADONIS vs. IBM Case Foundation and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

871,469 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ADONIS vs. IBM Case Foundation report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.