No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms vs QuarkXPress comparison

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Experience Manager (A...
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Customer Communications Management (CCM) (5th)
QuarkXPress
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Publishing Software (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms and QuarkXPress aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms is designed for Customer Communications Management (CCM) and holds a mindshare of 5.2%, down 6.3% compared to last year.
QuarkXPress, on the other hand, focuses on Publishing Software, holds 19.8% mindshare, up 18.6% since last year.
Customer Communications Management (CCM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms5.2%
Quadient Inspire17.4%
OpenText Communications16.7%
Other60.7%
Customer Communications Management (CCM)
Publishing Software Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
QuarkXPress19.8%
FrameMaker17.8%
Adobe Captivate14.7%
Other47.7%
Publishing Software
 

Featured Reviews

it_user692313 - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Partner and AEM Architect at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Its flexibility and customization ability. Ease of initial setup and complete set of features to support digital marketing initiatives.
Start small and plan your first set of objectives clearly, leaving all the “nice-to-haves” for a later phase. Starting this way will help companies get a sample of the benefits, and get familiar with the tool in general. After the first phase, they may find things that they thought they wanted are not really required or can be achieved in a better, more efficient way in the AEM world. Another useful suggestion is to avoid trying to recreate your current solution using AEM; rather, try to look for new and different ways to achieve the same results that take advantage of AEM’s features.
it_user5520 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Manager at a manufacturing company with 501-1,000 employees
Superb, descriptive, easy to use PageLayout program
I like Quark all around, with the exception of the customer service. Customer service appears to be outsourced, and you do not get the help that you need. Their representatives provide basic level support, so if you are looking for more, you need to rely on online support. Otherwise, I have found nothing wrong with Quark.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"All these features help companies create powerful web applications that can then be customized and maintained by marketers with little involvement from IT."
"LiveCycle has a good user interface and has developed an easy way to create fillable .pdf forms."
"Quark is an all around superb program."
 

Cons

"Help menu is a bit difficult to navigate."
"We have found occasional issues with stability but those were, in general, caused either by custom developed code or issues in the implemented architecture."
"I like Quark all around, with the exception of the customer service."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Communications Management (CCM) solutions are best for your needs.
899,204 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

Adobe LiveCycle
Quark
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

State of Illinois, Department of Human Services
Lufthansa Cargo, L'Appor, Vicor, Peugeot, Sud Ouest Group, Louis Vitton, London College of Communication, Agency Kreativdienst, Incisive Media Ltd, BNP Paribas, Autodata Ltd., Irish Government, Salvation Army, Thomas Cook, IBM Microelectronics, Savannah College of Art and Design, The University of Kentucky