Adobe ColdFusion vs GitHub CoPilot comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Adobe Logo
819 views|535 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
GitHub Logo
886 views|807 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe ColdFusion and GitHub CoPilot based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Adobe ColdFusion vs. GitHub CoPilot Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I find it to be the easiest server-side technology for website development. It easily integrates with virtually everything– from web APIs to NoSQL databases to RSS and XML services.""This tool was very easy learn, yet powerful enough to manage many sites on a single instance.""No need to import libraries from outside the environment.""The ability to write SQL queries was very helpful as we did not need to bother our DBAs in writing stored procedures for simple tasks.""Apart from providing a mature, reliable, consistent platform, Adobe also offers outstanding customer service and product support.""We save enormous amounts of time in development using this tool.""My client has been able to improve productivity with the use of the tool. The solution has them develop several tools that addressed their specific needs. They have become more efficient and safe with the use of the product.""I would like to say that its best feature is its different kinds of connectors. We have lots of in-built connectors."

More Adobe ColdFusion Pros →

"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance.""The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates.""The initial setup of the product is easy.""When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use.""The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities.""The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features.""The product is easy to integrate.""The document generation features are valuable."

More GitHub CoPilot Pros →

Cons
"The solution needs to improve its adaption capability with a third-party company. I want to see more communities or open knowledge resources with the tool.""There is not much third party authenticators in this solution""ColdFusion’s third-party authentication is currently limited to just a couple of companies, like Google and Facebook, and a few third-party SAML authenticators. From my personal perspective, adding LinkedIn and Microsoft would greatly benefit me.""Need to be able to Be able to inject Python, Java, Groovy, or PHP code into a CFML page.""Previously when I was trying to create some data, it was very difficult to get real-time data from Workfront.""Installation of the server software was formidable due the number of configurable options."

More Adobe ColdFusion Cons →

"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required.""Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required.""In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point.""There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions.""The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages.""In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results.""GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement.""The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."

More GitHub CoPilot Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It is a very effective solution and worth the price."
  • "If you really want to save money, there is a free open source CFML engine (former Railo, now Lucee) out there."
  • "The tool's pricing is high but it's totally worth the investment."
  • More Adobe ColdFusion Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The product offers a free version and a paid version. Whether to choose the product's free version or paid version depends on the size of the company where it will be used."
  • "GitHub CoPilot's pricing is reasonable. Our licensing costs were initially monthly, but then we switched to yearly payments. I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten."
  • "GitHub CoPilot comes readily available for enterprise customers, so it's a free add-on if you already have GitHub's enterprise license."
  • "A personal license is priced at ten dollars per month, while a professional or enterprise license costs nineteen dollars per user, and these rates are consistent for all users."
  • "It's affordable."
  • "There is a need to pay around 10 USD to be able to use the solution."
  • More GitHub CoPilot Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Rapid Application Development Software solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:I would like to say that its best feature is its different kinds of connectors. We have lots of in-built connectors.
    Top Answer:The tool's pricing is high but it's totally worth the investment.
    Top Answer:Currently, they have some legacy connectors with different tools, and they are creating native connectors. For example, AEM was only using HTTP or SMTP connections. However, now, AEM also has a native… more »
    Top Answer:Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later.
    Top Answer:Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later.
    Top Answer:In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. It was in the Power Automate. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point. There were significant… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    819
    Comparisons
    535
    Reviews
    3
    Average Words per Review
    479
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    886
    Comparisons
    807
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    453
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Adobe ColdFusion is a powerful server-side programming language for website and internal solution development. It is rapid application development (RAD) product that is easy to learn, well maintained, easily scalable in a clustered environment, stable, and can be integrated with various services. 

    The solution has helped organizations improve productivity and efficiency by developing tools that address specific needs and becoming safer using the product. Adobe ColdFusion is an excellent choice for organizations looking for a powerful and easy-to-use server-side programming language.

    Trained on billions of lines of code, GitHub Copilot turns natural language prompts into coding suggestions across dozens of languages.

    Sample Customers
    Inspirus, Promisan, Webapper, Giva, Frontech Solutions Inc, Digicon, ITX Corp, Wall Street Magnate, SimulTV, ten24 Digital Solutions, Prospective Medical Data International Inc, Alcatel-Lucent
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government22%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Educational Organization8%
    REVIEWERS
    Recruiting/Hr Firm14%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Non Profit14%
    Healthcare Company14%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Healthcare Company10%
    Computer Software Company9%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise8%
    Large Enterprise77%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise40%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise77%
    Buyer's Guide
    Adobe ColdFusion vs. GitHub CoPilot
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe ColdFusion vs. GitHub CoPilot and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Adobe ColdFusion is ranked 20th in Rapid Application Development Software with 6 reviews while GitHub CoPilot is ranked 16th in Rapid Application Development Software with 10 reviews. Adobe ColdFusion is rated 8.6, while GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Adobe ColdFusion writes "An easy-to-setup tool that can be used to automate repetitive tasks". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". Adobe ColdFusion is most compared with Oracle Application Express (APEX), Microsoft Azure App Service, Microsoft Power Apps, Appian and ServiceNow, whereas GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM, ServiceNow and Appian. See our Adobe ColdFusion vs. GitHub CoPilot report.

    See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.

    We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.