No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Adobe Captivate vs Red Hat Learning Subscription comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Captivate
Ranking in eLearning
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Publishing Software (1st)
Red Hat Learning Subscription
Ranking in eLearning
3rd
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2026, in the eLearning category, the mindshare of Adobe Captivate is 2.3%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat Learning Subscription is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eLearning Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Red Hat Learning Subscription0.9%
Adobe Captivate2.3%
Other96.8%
eLearning
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2814465 - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Cloud Cost Over And Visibility Parts at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Interactive e-learning creation has transformed our training and now delivers measurable time savings
I would recommend Adobe Captivate for organizations that need advanced interactive e-learning content and have dedicated training or L&D teams. We have workflows to handle collaboration between team members when working on Adobe Captivate projects. We track learner progress and performance using Adobe Captivate through the reporting feature that Adobe Captivate provides to manage this information. We are using the latest version to manage version control for Adobe Captivate projects. There is a process we follow to handle content updates or revisions in Adobe Captivate once a course is published to keep the materials current. I am unaware of how to ensure content created in Adobe Captivate is accessible to all learners, including those with disabilities.
UM
Student at Università degli studi di Salerno
Hands-on labs have transformed my theoretical studies and now support real business projects
While the platform is excellent overall, I think the main area for improvement would be adding even more practical resources and hands-on labs. The current guided labs are fantastic for learning initial concepts, but it would be incredibly useful to have more unguided, real-world troubleshooting scenarios or projects. This would allow learners to bridge the gap between following a step-by-step tutorial and facing a complex, unstructured problem, making the learning experience even better. More of these challenging practical resources would further prepare learners for not just exams but for the unpredictable nature of real-world production environments. Regarding course updates, one thing I would improve is having clearer transition guides between course versions. While navigating the catalog, I have noticed some courses have multiple active iterations, such as the Enterprise Linux Automation with Ansible course for both 8.4 and 9.0. It would be incredibly helpful if the platform highlighted the specific differences or updates introduced in the new release, making it more accessible.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Adobe Captivate is a complex software. You can create many complex learnings with it. T"
"It helped us bring in-house what would have otherwise been extremely costly projects."
"The most valuable features are the templates that come with the package, the recording features, as well as the surveys and quizzes that you can create with it, and I also like the content library."
"We use Adobe Captivate 5.5 with Adobe Technical Communication Suite 3.5 to produce technical how-to videos."
"Automatic responsive designs allow us to not have to code for any eLearning modules."
"Since using Adobe Captivate, I have noticed specific outcomes and improvements in my organization, including saving time and cost, and we have saved approximately 15 to 20% in time and cost after using Adobe Captivate."
"Red Hat Learning Subscription positively impacts my organization by upskilling the engineering and operations team, improving expertise in Linux, OpenShift, Kubernetes, and Ansible, managing standardized expertise, and reducing dependency on external training providers while supporting us with certifications."
"The best features of Red Hat Learning Subscription are its excellent combination of flexibility, hands-on learning, and certification support."
"Red Hat Learning Subscription has positively impacted my organization by improving the team's capabilities and the possibility of obtaining certifications."
"Red Hat Learning Subscription has definitely made things better because we use all Red Hat servers, which is a significant advantage."
"Red Hat Learning Subscription has positively impacted my organization as I used my OpenShift application and I am using OpenShift application for my projects with myself."
"The greatest return is in career readiness, as the platform successfully bridges the gap between academic theory and enterprise practice."
"Red Hat Learning Subscription is worth its money, so it is a worth investment."
"Red Hat Learning Subscription is very good as it allows you to do self-paced training, but there is also online training or on-demand training."
 

Cons

"Getting started with Captivate has been a struggle for two of us on our team."
"The text to speech capability needs to be improved."
"The voice sounds automated and I would like to have a more natural-sounding voice."
"The older or classic version of Adobe Captivate needs much improvement because everything looks very old."
"I would love to see a "For Dummies" option. It gets pretty extensive in its level of intricacies and options offered."
"I believe Adobe Captivate can be improved because the tool can feel complex for beginners, and the performance may slow down for large or highly interactive projects."
"I would love a quick widget which walks novices through the process along with descriptive output options."
"My experience with the pricing, implementation costs, and licenses for Red Hat Learning Subscription is that the prices are extremely expensive."
"Some labs feel a bit guided and the learning paths feel very generic at times, so adding more open-ended, real-world scenario-based labs and more role-based tracks would be very helpful."
"Red Hat's product portfolio needs to expand. Currently, it focuses only on Red Hat Linux, Ansible, and JBoss, which represents a very small market."
"However, after leaving Locaweb, I attempted to access courses and found that Red Hat Learning Subscription is exclusively paid, which led me to realize that launching some free courses for enthusiasts who want to learn at least the basics of Linux would be an interesting addition."
"It is somewhat pricey, but I used the free trial, and I want to continue with it."
"I find the subscription costs for individuals to be high, but they could be reduced with organizational support."
"While the platform is excellent overall, I think the main area for improvement would be adding even more practical resources and hands-on labs."
"I chose a rating of nine instead of ten because Red Hat Learning Subscription has interactive labs that are subject to time constraints."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This product is part of the larger Adobe Creative Cloud offering, which costs about $600 USD per year."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eLearning solutions are best for your needs.
914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Outsourcing Company
25%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Educational Organization
11%
University
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise18
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Adobe Captivate?
I believe Adobe Captivate can be improved because the tool can feel complex for beginners, and the performance may slow down for large or highly interactive projects.
What is your primary use case for Adobe Captivate?
My main use case for Adobe Captivate is to create interactive e-learning content including training courses, software simulations, and quizzes.
What advice do you have for others considering Adobe Captivate?
I would recommend Adobe Captivate for organizations that need advanced interactive e-learning content and have dedicated training or L&D teams. We have workflows to handle collaboration between...
What needs improvement with Red Hat Learning Subscription?
I believe specific areas that need improvement include adding more AI-powered learning, improving the lab experience, and expanding certification support.
What is your primary use case for Red Hat Learning Subscription?
I am using Red Hat Learning Subscription for learning Red Hat Linux. A quick, specific example of how I use Red Hat Learning Subscription in my day-to-day work is by taking the Red Hat Linux lab co...
What advice do you have for others considering Red Hat Learning Subscription?
I advise others looking into using Red Hat Learning Subscription to generally regard its training and support ecosystems because learners have access to official documentation, learning resources, ...
 

Also Known As

Captivate
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

GAAP Dynamic, Ceresti Health, ThinkBuzan, Visiting Nurse Service of New York, Design Goat, meLearning Solutions, The BRITE Initiative, Kineo
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Adobe Captivate vs. Red Hat Learning Subscription and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.
914,938 professionals have used our research since 2012.